Sen. Jack Hill’s Views on Transportation Issues

August 28, 2014 9:00 am

by Lawton Sack · 12 comments

Sen. Jack Hill (R-4, Appropriations Chair) recently penned some of his views on a few of the transportation issues in Georgia, with a particular focus upon the 4th Senatorial District that he serves.  He also provides some potential options for handling the growing transportation problems.  As usual, he is forthright with his comments and lays out the facts plainly.  Sen. Hill’s District covers all of Effingham, Bulloch, Candler, and Evans counties and parts of Tattnall and Emanuel counties.


Georgia is the 4th largest state, with nearly 10 million people and growing.  As concentrated as part of the state is around Atlanta and as spread out as the rest of the state is, it is little wonder that there is a long list of transportation needs that grows larger as the state grows and the projects become more expensive as inflation increases the costs year after year.

In the Fourth District, two counties with pressing transportation needs are Effingham and Bulloch Counties.

Effingham, as a rapidly growing county of over 50,000, has major transportation problems with commuting between Effingham and Chatham counties on a congested Ga. 21, a four lane GRIP highway, that has a choke point at the intersection of 21 and I-95.  A secondary route in and out of the county is badly needed and a route is well along in the planning stage.  But it is an expensive project that may languish unless new sources of funding, local and state are found.

Bulloch County has Ga. 67 connecting to I-16 (which is the main corridor for Statesboro and Georgia Southern University traffic) going to and from Savannah.  This highway is a two lane highway in the plans to four lane, but funding is the issue.

In other Fourth District Counties, a number of new roads need to be paved, but those remaining counties are all collecting and spending the additional 1 cent TSPOST funds that are in place for ten years.  Those counties will come close to meeting their transportation needs.

GA DOT has a long list of expensive state projects including the Northwest Corridor ($598 million), I-75 South Express Lanes ($176 million), I-285/SR400 ($950 million) and the Jimmy DeLoach Connector ($73 million) now under construction to the port in Savannah.  The GDOT’s Major Strategic Plan, which are all aimed at the traffic in and around Atlanta and out of state from there, totals in excess of $12 billion.  Lists exist that approach $100 billion.  


Some may argue that $1 billion plus in state transportation funds plus federal and local funds are sufficient to meet the state’s highest priorities.  There is also the argument that voters seemed to display in voting down the TSPLOST referendum two years ago, and that is a distrust of government spending new funds where they say they will, or project politics or that DOT cannot produce projects on-time, on-budget as promised.

But, there is strong evidence that in a state where transportation plays such a central role in commerce, logistics and commuting, along with tourism, that the status quo or simply funding major projects one at a time over the years, almost certainly inhibits the state’s prosperity.

Yes, there are highway contractors pushing for new funding with an eye to getting construction dollars back where they used to be, but if you listen to planners, economic developers and local leaders not just in the Atlanta area but all over the state, the future of Georgia is tied inextricably to maintaining and expanding existing corridors and traffic movers and creating new ones where growth demands.  Commuting time in the Metro Atlanta area has become a nationally known statistic.

Lacking new funding, the leadership of the state will direct a high percentage of those dollars to projects of highest significance which will probably focus on the Atlanta area and could leave the rest of the state behind.


1.  Do nothing—see above paragraph

2.  Keep the 1% Sales Tax of the 4% collected on Motor Fuel that is presently being transferred to the General Treasury and used in the State budget.  Of course that is a $180 million dollar cut to other parts of the budget.  The Fuel Tax, then 3%, was created in 1979 replacing 3% of the existing sales tax which allowed the remaining 1% of the new 4% tax to flow to the General Budget through Appropriations.  Of course any change could be phased in over some years.

3.  “Debt held” accounts for 24 % of the total DOT state appropriations.  That amounts to $239.5 million yearly in debt service on state debt issued to build roads.  If the state added this to the interest the state already pays, thereby adding this debt to the state’s other general obligations, this would free up that $239 million to be spent on roads and bridges.  The additional debt could be managed by possibly delaying the funding of other projects for one or more years and managing the debt as part of the state’s overall bond management.  Again, a change like this could be phased in.

4.  Implement some “new” local option sales tax “TSPLOST II” to be spent solely on local or regional projects or regional projects as local governments see fit per local referendums.  Something like this would allow fast-growing areas to jump start the development of highways and/or other transportation options. — “Spoiler Alert” — Any new sales tax is seen as an inhibitor to tax reform…reducing the income tax and replacing with additional sales taxes.

5.  Allow a state-wide referendum on additional spending for state transportation priorities by a statewide sales tax.  Hard to figure how rural areas would fare in this scenario though…I’m “agin” it, at first blush.

6.  “Monkey” with the existing Motor Fuel Taxes, changing to all Sales Tax or some new idea like taxing by miles traveled, but increasing the total tax.  It is hard though, to imagine Georgia lawmakers breaking the mold too drastically.

benevolus August 28, 2014 at 3:19 pm

Fourth largest state? By what measure?

Charlie August 28, 2014 at 3:27 pm

By population we’re the 8th largest state. But it’s possible we’re up there with highway lane miles. The DOT presenation from the first study committee meeting showed that we were about the same there as California and ahead of Florida if my memory serves correctly.

Lawton Sack August 28, 2014 at 4:50 pm

He probably had 4th on his brain as it is his Senate District. GA was 7th in total public road length, as of 2012, with 125,523 total miles. This is per form HM-10 issued by the Federal Highway Association in October, 2013.

benevolus August 28, 2014 at 6:00 pm

I suspect that’s right.
I don’t know much about him, but that seems like a pretty realistic assessment.

saltycracker August 31, 2014 at 10:18 am

Lots of variations of road miles on the FHA website

Dave Bearse August 28, 2014 at 11:10 pm

I’d think the people of the three RDCs that approved regional T-SPLOSTs likely to oppose any new or increased state tax. Such taxes would be levied on all, with the revenues presumably directed to the greatest need. The need in those RDCs is less because of T-SPLOST however, in effect punishing them for approving it.

Charlie August 29, 2014 at 9:04 am

I know this issue comes up frequently within the groups studying the issue, and they are working to ensure there is “equity” in the situation. Specifically, the Macon 75/16 interchange is in one of the regions. Expediting completion of the fall line freeway crosses all three regions. There’s plenty of need to go around, and I believe these folks will feel included in any final solution.

Al Gray August 29, 2014 at 10:59 am

Well, the three regions that passed TSPLOST should not receive the notion of increasing the gasoline tax well, although I noted that Columbus’ DOT guy Sam Wellborn actually advocated exactly that in a region where TSPLOST passed. I hope we can bring enough public furor to the September meeting in Augusta to drive the point home that we don’t want to pay more transportation taxes when we are already paying for our transportation improvements through gas taxes, SPLOSTS and TSPLOST in the Central Savannah region.

jackhill August 29, 2014 at 1:04 pm

…picky, picky…Georgia is 4th largest in land mass which is important in considering transportation…

Will Durant August 29, 2014 at 2:12 pm

As does the population. Don’t you think a stretch of highway with an average daily traffic count of 250,000 merits more consideration than one with an ADT of 250?

Dave Bearse August 30, 2014 at 2:59 pm

I assume someone is using the handle “jackhill”, as I don’t think Senator Hill unable to correct such a blatant error if he chose to do so:

Georgia is 21st in land size. It’s smaller in size than the average state size, excluding Alaska. Pitiful.

saltycracker August 31, 2014 at 10:07 am

I thought Georgia may be 4th in counties but we are #2

254 – Texas
159 – Georgia
134 – VA
120 – KY
Down the list

100 – N.C.
95 – TN
82 – MS
67 – FL
67 – AL
56 – SC

Comments on this entry are closed.