Guest Post By Senator Curt Thompson

A guest post by Senator Curt Thompson (D-Tucker) on why he supports HR1162, the charter school amendment.

The debate over the use of charter schools within Georgia ought to be over policy, not politics. That said, in these hyper-partisan times, everything can become a political issue. Like most political issues, the reality is much broader than a one or two word description attached to it as a slogan (School Choice, Reproductive Rights vs. Pro-Life, Death Tax vs. Inheritance Tax, the Fair Tax vs. Tax Fairness are just a few examples from both the right and left).

I have tried to steer away from these slogans when it comes to education in favor of concentrating strictly on policy. The truth is that I support the creation of charter schools because I think it makes sense to allow greater choice within the public schools. This is especially true when the child, the parents, or both want a more specialized institution; whether it has a focus on math, science, the performing arts, music, or just has a single sex student body. I have voted in favor of Charter School measures in the past and support other efforts to innovate within the public school framework. Things like magnet schools, international baccalaureate schools, and schools that specialize in vocational education should all be expanded, enhanced and funded so that families and students have the ability to choose a public education that best meets their needs.

Admittedly, as a Democrat, this has sometimes been a hard needle to thread. Many in the base of my party see Charter Schools as a vehicle to privatizing education and issuing vouchers. At the same time many Democrats have also been staunch supporters of this concept including the former Governor of Indiana, Evan Bayh, and our current President, Barack Obama. In fact, funding for President Obama’s “Race to the Top” program is directed at and contingent on having strong charter school programs. It is also a little known fact that the concept of Charter Schools didn’t come from anti-public education Republicans, but by leaders in teachers unions who wanted schools that had increased flexibility for their teachers.

I have stuck to what I believe is good, long-term policy in encouraging, supporting—and yes, in certain cases—mandating that public schools offer more diverse programs and options to those they serve. This is why I voted for HB881 in 2008, which created the original state charter school commission recently struck down by the Georgia Supreme Court. I’m comfortable with that vote, would vote that way again on that bill, and would vote that way again even after reading the Georgia Supreme Court opinion in Gwinnett School District vs. Cox.

The reality is that 33 states—Red States like Texas and Indiana, Blue States such as California, Delaware, and Massachusetts, and Purple states like Colorado, and Florida—have some form of state authorizer for charter schools. Having a state authorizer for public schools in Georgia spells neither the end of public schools as we know it, nor surrenders Democratic Party principles to some right wing appeasement agenda.

I wish this issue had not become such a partisan one this year. It seems like the list of litmus tests each elected official faces from the base of their party grows each year. To dare to vote against these litmus tests, or even question them, gets you accused of being a DINO or RINO (Democrat in Name Only or Republican in Name Only) by our respective bases. It’s what contributes to the retirements of accomplished US Senators such as Democrat Ben Nelson and Republican Olympia Snow. It’s what contributes to the permanent gridlock in Washington where working together isn’t just frowned upon – it’s considered heresy. I don’t think there is time for similar partisan intransigence in a state that is consistently in the bottom three in our country’s educational rankings.

Ultimately that is why I chose to vote for HR1162, the proposed constitutional amendment to allow a state authorizer for charter schools. Voting for it alongside 39 other State Senators and 123 State Representatives, both Democrats and Republicans, means this issue will now be sent to Georgia’s voters. There will be a referendum on the November ballot to finally settle whether Georgia will, in fact, have a state authorizer for charter schools.

Voting for HR1162 is consistent with my prior support of public charter schools and consistent with my support of innovation within the framework of public schooling. Supporting that sort of innovation is what will help close the achievement gap our students face. Supporting that sort of innovation is also proof that public schools are the best way to ensure a quality education for our state’s children, while drastic and ideologically-driven causes like private school vouchers are not.

There is no magic bullet to fix Georgia’s public education system: not charter schools, not union contracts, not vouchers, not simply spending more money, and not even the small class sizes that have long been the core proposal I have made to improve our state’s public education system. The reality is that it will take multiple efforts on multiple fronts, adequate funding and revenue, and the patience to stick with the long-term commitment of consistently working to make real and lasting change. Having a state authorizer for charter schools is part of that mix. In November, Georgia voters will have a chance to tell us what they think.


  1. charterquestion says:

    Who will be on the state chartering board, isn’t it better for elected people not appointed cronies in Atlanta that don’t meet often to oversee schools?

  2. benevolus says:

    Well, I think somebody screwed up by changing the definition of state chartered schools in the amendment language.
    Supporters are saying that we have to do this because of the Supreme Court ruling. Maybe we have to do something, but we don’t have to do THIS. Come back next year and get it right.

    It just seems obvious that the way it is written is a response to some well-connected or at least vocal parents who want something (potentially) better for their own kids, with no consideration of how it affects their neighbors and the wider community. I don’t even have any kids, but I am pretty sure that removing motivated parents from their current school and reducing the money those schools receive will likely degrade the quality of that school.
    There has to be a better way.

  3. cheapseats says:

    Everyone I’ve spoken who opposes this amendment also strongly supports charter schools. We just oppose the part about “… have a state authorizer for charter schools.”

    • Trey A. says:

      Some of us who oppose the amendment also want a state level appeals board to hear cases when charter applications were unjustly denied by local systems.

  4. DeKalb Inside Out says:

    We just oppose the part about “… have a state authorizer for charter schools.”
    House Resolution 1162 is the Charter Amendment we are voting on Tuesday. I don’t see that phrase or even the word ‘authorizer’ in the amendment.

  5. DeKalb Inside Out says:

    I don’t understand what you are saying. This is the amendment

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Georgia so as to clarify the authority of the state to establish state-wide education policy; to restate the authority of the General Assembly to establish special schools; to provide that special schools include state charter schools; to provide for related matters; to provide for the submission of this amendment for ratification or rejection; and for other purposes.

    Please explain your issue with this amendment.

    Note: All local money stays the local school district. For every child that goes to a charter school, the local school district has more money per child in the traditional school district.

Comments are closed.