Apparently, nuance is unacceptable in Senate negotiations these days. Voting against a very flawed bill in committee and stating, quite articulately, the problems with a bill in its current form will keep him voting against it are not sufficient statements of opposition for those who believe Agenda 21 runs all foreign and domestic policy (and these cool internets too!).
Thus, Senator Johnny Isakson, who has opposed the LOST treaty all along, has given up attempts to explain the total of objectionable items in the treaty, and is now stating unequivacably that he is against said treaty. So there it is. Isakson is a “No” on LOST. Those that have any idea what this post is about can now either safely remove your tinfoil, or point it in another direction.