<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CD-8 Straw Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-222417</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-222417</guid>
		<description>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/25/bengal-island-succumbs-to-global-warming-nonsense-ap-gets-nutty-over-loss-of-a-sandbar/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/25/bengal-island-succumbs-to-global-warming-nonsense-ap-gets-nutty-over-loss-of-a-sandbar/" rel="nofollow">http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/25/bengal-island-succumbs-to-global-warming-nonsense-ap-gets-nutty-over-loss-of-a-sandbar/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-222235</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-222235</guid>
		<description>You haven&#039;t been exchanging your FRNs for real money? Y&#039;all are gonna have to rough it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You haven&#8217;t been exchanging your FRNs for real money? Y&#8217;all are gonna have to rough it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-222234</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-222234</guid>
		<description>Again, Doug, Red is running circles around you intellectually. C&#039;mon, you&#039;re better than that. Even if you are just a blogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, Doug, Red is running circles around you intellectually. C&#8217;mon, you&#8217;re better than that. Even if you are just a blogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bartsimpsonisdaman</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-222043</link>
		<dc:creator>bartsimpsonisdaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-222043</guid>
		<description>Damn, where do you begin.  Its been awhile since being on the PP and can see things are interesting. 
So there&#039;s a psycho chick running for congress who loves the molester McBerry?   You have ghost chasers?  Damn, what other oddities you got down there?   Sounds like a bunch of inbreds.  

You keep doing what you&#039;re doing.  

Remember, vote Barnes!  He&#039;s ugly as hell but knows how to keep his pants on.  He aint no molester and his staff won&#039;t be from the Exorcist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, where do you begin.  Its been awhile since being on the PP and can see things are interesting.<br />
So there&#8217;s a psycho chick running for congress who loves the molester McBerry?   You have ghost chasers?  Damn, what other oddities you got down there?   Sounds like a bunch of inbreds.  </p>
<p>You keep doing what you&#8217;re doing.  </p>
<p>Remember, vote Barnes!  He&#8217;s ugly as hell but knows how to keep his pants on.  He aint no molester and his staff won&#8217;t be from the Exorcist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heyandrew</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221967</link>
		<dc:creator>heyandrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221967</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your explanation, it does makes things clearer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your explanation, it does makes things clearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benevolus</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221920</link>
		<dc:creator>benevolus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221920</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s happening right now.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100324/ap_on_sc/as_india_disappearing_island</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s happening right now.<br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100324/ap_on_sc/as_india_disappearing_island" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100324/ap_on_sc/as_india_disappearing_island</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polisavvy</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221917</link>
		<dc:creator>polisavvy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221917</guid>
		<description>So I don&#039;t get in trouble for thread jacking, I&#039;m just responding to Doug&#039;s question.  I&#039;m doing fine.  I, like most people, was shocked at the Kansas game.  Who would have thought that would happen?  I still have 9 of Sweet 16, 6 of Elite 8, three of final four, and Kentucky winning it all.  I guess it&#039;s okay.  Some of the crazy games really messed me up; but, I guess that was to be expected after two of the first three games played went into OT (only 2 the whole tournament last year).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I don&#8217;t get in trouble for thread jacking, I&#8217;m just responding to Doug&#8217;s question.  I&#8217;m doing fine.  I, like most people, was shocked at the Kansas game.  Who would have thought that would happen?  I still have 9 of Sweet 16, 6 of Elite 8, three of final four, and Kentucky winning it all.  I guess it&#8217;s okay.  Some of the crazy games really messed me up; but, I guess that was to be expected after two of the first three games played went into OT (only 2 the whole tournament last year).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221915</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221915</guid>
		<description>Doug, I have never once called for the &quot;overthrow of the USA.&quot; What I have called for is the restoration of the constitutional order as originally intended by the Founders. I have argued and will never cease arguing that state’s rights including nullification, interposition, and secession are allowed under said constitutional order. (And for that matter are a necessary part of maintaining said constitutional order.)

I am not presently calling for secession. The country is not there yet. I would and do defend the idea that secession is a legitimate moral and legal constitutional option if other lesser measure of restoring said constitutional order fail.

But even if I was calling for immediate secession, that would not be calling for the &quot;overthrow of the USA.&quot; Secession is not overthrow. It is not revolution. It is the leaving of a territory from a previous political bond while leaving the previous bond intact among the remaining constituent territories. The USA would still be a functioning entity if a state or states left.

It is not my fault that you were taught only the victor&#039;s version of history when you were in school in Ohio (Southern Ohio was a hotbed of Copperhead support for the South BTW.) and hence are horrified when confronted with real history. You claim to oh so love your country, but what you really love is a myth. You don’t love the actually history of your country. You love the myth constructed by the victors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, I have never once called for the &#8220;overthrow of the USA.&#8221; What I have called for is the restoration of the constitutional order as originally intended by the Founders. I have argued and will never cease arguing that state’s rights including nullification, interposition, and secession are allowed under said constitutional order. (And for that matter are a necessary part of maintaining said constitutional order.)</p>
<p>I am not presently calling for secession. The country is not there yet. I would and do defend the idea that secession is a legitimate moral and legal constitutional option if other lesser measure of restoring said constitutional order fail.</p>
<p>But even if I was calling for immediate secession, that would not be calling for the &#8220;overthrow of the USA.&#8221; Secession is not overthrow. It is not revolution. It is the leaving of a territory from a previous political bond while leaving the previous bond intact among the remaining constituent territories. The USA would still be a functioning entity if a state or states left.</p>
<p>It is not my fault that you were taught only the victor&#8217;s version of history when you were in school in Ohio (Southern Ohio was a hotbed of Copperhead support for the South BTW.) and hence are horrified when confronted with real history. You claim to oh so love your country, but what you really love is a myth. You don’t love the actually history of your country. You love the myth constructed by the victors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221904</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221904</guid>
		<description>Anyway, I think we all have had our say, and I appreciate the comments from Maurice, RD and others as well as Ken and Ralph.  No one involved was at their best in this, and there is something to learn for all of us.

A simple phone call from Ken or Ralph asking me to step aside would have worked a lot better than attacking my integrity, which is extremely important to me.  I would have still loved giving input in trying to guarantee a fair process, my math background would have caught issues with the &quot;weighted average&quot; method and I could have helped with publicizing the event.

As for my part, perhaps I should have just taken a deep breath and let it go.

There is an election to be had and it should be about the candidates, not Ken, Ralph or myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway, I think we all have had our say, and I appreciate the comments from Maurice, RD and others as well as Ken and Ralph.  No one involved was at their best in this, and there is something to learn for all of us.</p>
<p>A simple phone call from Ken or Ralph asking me to step aside would have worked a lot better than attacking my integrity, which is extremely important to me.  I would have still loved giving input in trying to guarantee a fair process, my math background would have caught issues with the &#8220;weighted average&#8221; method and I could have helped with publicizing the event.</p>
<p>As for my part, perhaps I should have just taken a deep breath and let it go.</p>
<p>There is an election to be had and it should be about the candidates, not Ken, Ralph or myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221893</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221893</guid>
		<description>Life is too short to let anger or bitterness get the best of you.  As for my bracket, if OSU wins and WV beats KY, I am in good shape.

How&#039;d you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life is too short to let anger or bitterness get the best of you.  As for my bracket, if OSU wins and WV beats KY, I am in good shape.</p>
<p>How&#8217;d you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221891</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221891</guid>
		<description>There is not a &quot;no friends to the right of me strategy&quot; Red.  You are not to the left or the right of anyone, you are totally off the grid.

Anyone calling for the overthrow of the USA is whacky at best and delusional and dangerous at worst.  Throw in the ties to racism and we have a winner for worst platform plank ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is not a &#8220;no friends to the right of me strategy&#8221; Red.  You are not to the left or the right of anyone, you are totally off the grid.</p>
<p>Anyone calling for the overthrow of the USA is whacky at best and delusional and dangerous at worst.  Throw in the ties to racism and we have a winner for worst platform plank ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221887</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221887</guid>
		<description>Speaking as someone who was in on the Bibb county discussions (I couldn&#039;t make the 8th district meeting since it happened to fall during my son&#039;s birthday party) the main reason for having it after qualifying was to limit it to serious candidates.  More specifically candidates that had or could raise the 5000 dollars to qualify. 

My idea was to allow anyone who had that in escrow to attend and have 4 like Ralph mentioned, starting early.  The rest of our group preferred to just wait for qualified candidates.

For me,  the big reason for waiting for qualifying is that as a grass roots person, I believe it is not fair to ask for volunteers, get people excited about your campaign and donate money if you cannot personally guarantee you can pay to get on the ballot in the first place.  I predict that of the 5 or 6  people claiming to be candidates, only 2 and maybe 3 are ready to write that check.

Activists time is a precious thing, candidates should not waste it exercising their own ego for vapor campaigns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as someone who was in on the Bibb county discussions (I couldn&#8217;t make the 8th district meeting since it happened to fall during my son&#8217;s birthday party) the main reason for having it after qualifying was to limit it to serious candidates.  More specifically candidates that had or could raise the 5000 dollars to qualify. </p>
<p>My idea was to allow anyone who had that in escrow to attend and have 4 like Ralph mentioned, starting early.  The rest of our group preferred to just wait for qualified candidates.</p>
<p>For me,  the big reason for waiting for qualifying is that as a grass roots person, I believe it is not fair to ask for volunteers, get people excited about your campaign and donate money if you cannot personally guarantee you can pay to get on the ballot in the first place.  I predict that of the 5 or 6  people claiming to be candidates, only 2 and maybe 3 are ready to write that check.</p>
<p>Activists time is a precious thing, candidates should not waste it exercising their own ego for vapor campaigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221884</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221884</guid>
		<description>I get where you are coming from Ick. I really do. But why is the best way to deal with us windmill tilters (I absolutely do not deny this is what I am.) with sarcasm, condescension and name calling? And why the no friends to the right of me strategy? Are constitutionalist McBerry supporters really more of a problem for the Republic than Nancy Pelosi?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get where you are coming from Ick. I really do. But why is the best way to deal with us windmill tilters (I absolutely do not deny this is what I am.) with sarcasm, condescension and name calling? And why the no friends to the right of me strategy? Are constitutionalist McBerry supporters really more of a problem for the Republic than Nancy Pelosi?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221880</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221880</guid>
		<description>Those don&#039;t come cheap Bill, and in this economy who has the money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those don&#8217;t come cheap Bill, and in this economy who has the money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221876</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221876</guid>
		<description>There is no &quot;after qualifying rule.&quot;  This first forum  was to say &quot;Thank you&quot; to those willing to get out front and fire the opening rounds.  There are some who think a &#039;bigger&#039; horse will get on the track during qualifying; maybe so.  But by having the next event the Saturday after qualifying, they better be ready to rumble!!

As far as the poll, it has some limited value.  For one, it did boost attendance.  It did highlight some interesting (and valid) signals in the statewide races.  It may be of more interest who came in highest without packing the pews.  That is, who was the over=riding choice for second - after everyone voted for the &quot;one what brought them.&quot;

But in the end this is politics.  Each candidates has the raw numbers to spin any way they choose.  I personally think we have 4 great candidates and that is what should be our primary concern at the moment.  I realize everyone doesn&#039;t share my opinion and they have every right to be wrong! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no &#8220;after qualifying rule.&#8221;  This first forum  was to say &#8220;Thank you&#8221; to those willing to get out front and fire the opening rounds.  There are some who think a &#8216;bigger&#8217; horse will get on the track during qualifying; maybe so.  But by having the next event the Saturday after qualifying, they better be ready to rumble!!</p>
<p>As far as the poll, it has some limited value.  For one, it did boost attendance.  It did highlight some interesting (and valid) signals in the statewide races.  It may be of more interest who came in highest without packing the pews.  That is, who was the over=riding choice for second &#8211; after everyone voted for the &#8220;one what brought them.&#8221;</p>
<p>But in the end this is politics.  Each candidates has the raw numbers to spin any way they choose.  I personally think we have 4 great candidates and that is what should be our primary concern at the moment.  I realize everyone doesn&#8217;t share my opinion and they have every right to be wrong! <img src='http://www.peachpundit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heyandrew</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221874</link>
		<dc:creator>heyandrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221874</guid>
		<description>Sorry I got my qualifying and primary mixed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I got my qualifying and primary mixed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221869</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221869</guid>
		<description>Charlie, if you&#039;re just here to debate the things that aren’t settled, why don&#039;t you stay out of the more rational discourse of us grownups around here, who believe in &lt;i&gt;conserving&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; (as in &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;conservative&lt;/i&gt;) our Republican form of government (as in, well, &lt;i&gt;Republican&lt;/i&gt;)? Thanks so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie, if you&#8217;re just here to debate the things that aren’t settled, why don&#8217;t you stay out of the more rational discourse of us grownups around here, who believe in <i>conserving</i><i> (as in </i><i>conservative</i>) our Republican form of government (as in, well, <i>Republican</i>)? Thanks so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icarus</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221852</link>
		<dc:creator>Icarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221852</guid>
		<description>My point is pretty simple Red.  If I was a history professor, or maybe even a constitutional law professor, we could  debate it in an ivory tower all day long.

But this is a political blog.  Politics as I&#039;ve said many times before is about reaching 51%.  I would venture that the 14th amendment has become an accepted part of the constitution to at least 99% of the American population.

So I&#039;m here to debate the things that aren&#039;t settled, not tilt windmills on tangential issues that most of us do not believe are the subject of debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is pretty simple Red.  If I was a history professor, or maybe even a constitutional law professor, we could  debate it in an ivory tower all day long.</p>
<p>But this is a political blog.  Politics as I&#8217;ve said many times before is about reaching 51%.  I would venture that the 14th amendment has become an accepted part of the constitution to at least 99% of the American population.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m here to debate the things that aren&#8217;t settled, not tilt windmills on tangential issues that most of us do not believe are the subject of debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heyandrew</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221851</link>
		<dc:creator>heyandrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221851</guid>
		<description>Thank you Ralph. I wondered about that. Why the after qualifying rule? Was it because they did not wish to endorse a particular candidate?

Oh I forgot to mention something. I do not understand the whole issue about polls.  Do people really vote for the one that they believe is favourite to win, or the candidate  that reflects their own principles. Surely principles should will out every time. I would not vote for a candidate just because they are favourite to win, if they do not reflect how I would vote. The only good I see them being for a candidate is in a special election, when you are trying to see whom the second best candidate is going to be for a run-off. Did wonders for Paul Broun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Ralph. I wondered about that. Why the after qualifying rule? Was it because they did not wish to endorse a particular candidate?</p>
<p>Oh I forgot to mention something. I do not understand the whole issue about polls.  Do people really vote for the one that they believe is favourite to win, or the candidate  that reflects their own principles. Surely principles should will out every time. I would not vote for a candidate just because they are favourite to win, if they do not reflect how I would vote. The only good I see them being for a candidate is in a special election, when you are trying to see whom the second best candidate is going to be for a run-off. Did wonders for Paul Broun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2010/03/22/cd-8-straw-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-221850</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=21718#comment-221850</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute, Red... you&#039;re trying to carry on a rational discussion? On Peach Pundit? With CHARLIE?

What you been smokin&#039;, mon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute, Red&#8230; you&#8217;re trying to carry on a rational discussion? On Peach Pundit? With CHARLIE?</p>
<p>What you been smokin&#8217;, mon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

