Comments on: Video: Deal still pursuing Obama’s birth certificate

By: B Balz

B Balz — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:46:17 +0000

Left out jet contrails as well.

By: polisavvy

polisavvy — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:43:47 +0000

It does have a certain entertainment value to it, doesn’t it? Plus, it really does irritate his fans/supporters, although Deal is the one that started the whole thing (at his constituents’ requests). Deal is the one who ran from news cameras by ducking in bushes. This could have all been over a long time ago if he had handled it differently and not shied away from the press. This is a problem HE created, not us. I wish his fans/supporters would realize this.

By: benevolus

benevolus — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:13:59 +0000

I’m not an anti-birther, I just want to keep the “conspiracy” alive for as long as possible. It’s entertaining as all get out!

By: Game Fan

Game Fan — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:28:55 +0000

As a certified member of the grassroots, I have no idea if this is good political strategy or not. And the “birth” issue ain’t even in my “top ten” issues. (And I’m still definitely a birther). I see no reason not to be at this point. Not sure if it’s in Nathan Deal’s top ten either. It’s difficult to discern with all the outrage over the topic and how it’s magnified to such an extreme by the anti-birthers. What’s the reason to be a die-hard anti-birther? What’s to gain or lose? I don’t get it. What’s wrong with holding politicians to some basic standards? What’s so bad about asking questions that never get answered? Why have multiple versions of a C.O.L.B. and why isn’t someone arrested? The “average Joe” gets fined or arrested for forging documents.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lex,_Rex

By: Game Fan

Game Fan — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:07:43 +0000

Jason
Your commentary fails the logic test nine times outta ten. And since when did Libertarians start attributing faulty logic to people and grouping and labeling and insulting people according to “group”? And taking a strong stance with the status quo with no solid evidence to your advantage?

By: Game Fan

Game Fan — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:03:05 +0000

Loren
the “revealed as so much hot air” link seems to be non-existent. Or expired or something. So maybe you can find another link for the confession and retraction of this guy’s 300 page analysis of the document. Or not.

By: benevolus

benevolus — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:12:33 +0000

Reagan failed to mention Big Business? I’m sure they are for the little guy. Ahem.

By: IndyInjun

IndyInjun — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:59:12 +0000

He may run for that post in his current party The Repubic Party of Georgia.

That hit my funny bone.

It puts Deal closer to his real ideological roots than calling himself a Republican.

By: BillinSuwanee

BillinSuwanee — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:38:50 +0000

Buzz … he is a kook. My dead dear grandmother once told me; “Billy you can’t have a conversation with a kook.”

By: BillinSuwanee

BillinSuwanee — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:37:44 +0000

John Konop,

Nathan Dudd is a Repubic. PUMA follows along with the Repubic Georgia GOP Party

By: BillinSuwanee

BillinSuwanee — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:35:38 +0000

ReaganRepublican,

Wrong. I live in the 9th District. No one here actually cares. Nathan is doing this because it plays in North/Coastal/and Southern Georgia.

Nathan Dudd thinks he has the 9th District sewn up. So, he is trying to garner much needed support in the the other areas of Georgia.

He will fail because he is a Repubic … closet Liberal/Socialist. Hey remember he was elected to Congress as a Democrap.

The “Real Deal” is exposed for all to see.

By: BillinSuwanee

BillinSuwanee — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:32:11 +0000

ReaganRepublican,

Ronald Reagan once said; “You can’t be for big government, big taxes, and bid bureaucracy and still be for the little guy.”

Nathan Dudd voted for;

1. No Child Left Behind – Big government
2. Medicare Prescription Drug – Big Taxes/Spending
3. Homeland Security – Big Bureaucracy

What is it about Socialism that Nathan does NOT like?

Nathan Dudd is NO Reagan Republican … he is a Repubic … a closet Liberal/Socialist.

By: BillinSuwanee

BillinSuwanee — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:29:29 +0000

Byte… Nathan Dudd does boast that he is working closely with John Lewis on the water issues. Maybe he intends to cross dress as Cynthia McKinney.

By: BillinSuwanee

BillinSuwanee — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:27:31 +0000

Nathan Dudd is definitely NOT the intellectual epicenter of the Republican Party. He may run for that post in his current party The Repubic Party of Georgia.

By: polisavvy

polisavvy — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:23:38 +0000

Agreed and in this particular point in time in politics, perception can be everything. Ethics can win or lose an election. I totally agree with you that if he can clear this mess up, he should; if he can’t, then it will continue to be the albatross around his neck.

By: Doug Deal

Doug Deal — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:19:35 +0000

Definitely Sarah

By: ProgressivePeach

ProgressivePeach — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:36:02 +0000

Is Nathan Deal the intellectual epicenter of the Republican Party now, or is it still Sarah Palin?

By: polisavvy

polisavvy — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:14:10 +0000

Ha ha ha ha!! Funny!

By: John Konop

John Konop — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:23:06 +0000

ReaganRepublican,

Is Deal a PUMA?

By: galiberal

galiberal — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:06:55 +0000

Why will Deal not prove he is eligible? All we are asking for is Proof? Why is PeachPundit ignoring the story? Must be part of that crazy liberal main-stream media :-p

Proofers Getting some Attention: http://galiberal.com/?p=7753

But honestly, is it not a little strange that he has not sent the documentation yet. I mean, if he requests it from Obama and he doesn’t send it himself, is that not a bit hypocritical.

I am sure Deal is eligible, but come on, he had to know this type of thing was bound to happen.