That would be Eric Johnson. I’ve confirmed that Fox 5 is going to review the handling of the ethics investigation into Glenn Richardson and allege that Eric Johnson has some responsibility in letting it go on.
Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State
That would be Eric Johnson. I’ve confirmed that Fox 5 is going to review the handling of the ethics investigation into Glenn Richardson and allege that Eric Johnson has some responsibility in letting it go on.
{ 26 comments }
I wonder if this will be as accurate as the call from yesterday.
Jackals don’t worry about accuracy.
I am glad that Richardson is apparently going. I do think the powers that be probably helped sweep the ethics investigation under the rug and Johnson and Cagle probably had a significant role in that process. Time will tell whether that hurts his campaign for governor or not.
But the real ticking time bomb is in the Senate, where another shoe may drop. Apparently the shoe strings have not been tied very well up to now!
Fox 5 should go after Eric Johnson. The committee had no rules, conducted no interviews, did no investigation. Just threw the thing out. Eric said he considered Glenn Richardson his friend. And he took care of him. Of course, Eric had some help – Rep. Lynn Smith and a Democrat, Sen. George Hooks. But Eric was Chairman of the committee, ridiculed the complaint, and covered up for Glenn. Now he is running for Governor. He needs to explain himself.
I also see where Fox 5 is having trouble getting in touch with AGL, which needs to be held accountable for what they did in trying to get the ratepayers to fund a $300 million pipeline. Maybe the PSC can look into what all of the AGL lobbyists, including chief lobbyist Lindsay Thomas, did at the time. PSC member Chuck Eaton often comments on this site. Chuck, what say you?
George Hooks (D-Americus) was involved in that? Interesting indeed…
“Maybe the PSC can look into what all of the AGL lobbyists, including chief lobbyist Lindsay Thomas, did at the time.” Sounds good until you know who the lobbyist in question worked for before she worked for AGL.
But is this the ONLY ethics case Eric Johnson had a hand in that involved a State leader?
To piggy-back a bit off of what “fishtail” posted above, below are some facts as it pertains to the involvement of former state Senator Eric Johnson (R – Savannah) and the ethics complaint filed against House Speaker Glenn Richardson (R – Hiram).
In January of 2007, Bobby Kahn filed an ethics complaint with the ten-member Joint Legislative Ethics Committee alleging that “Speaker of the House Glenn Richardson abused his office by entering into an inappropriate relationship with a lobbyist and acting on behalf of that lobbyist’s employer.” [<a href="http://alt.cimedia.com/ajc/complaint.pdf"SOURCE]
Less than a week after the complaint was filed, the Joint Legislative Ethics Committee dismissed the charges. A letter issued by the bipartisan Review Committee said, “The Review Committee does not find that sufficient information exists to find probable cause to warrant further investigation by the Review Committee or the full Joint Legislative Ethics Committee . . .” [SOURCE]
Former state Senator Eric Johnson (R – Savannah), who at the time was the chairman of the Joint Legislative Ethics Committee, released the following January 18, 2007 press release commenting on the panel’s work:
On the same day that former state Senator Johnson released his statement, Speaker Richardson commented, ““Now that these baseless political attacks are behind me, I look forward to continuing to do the job I have been elected to do. We will focus on reducing the tax burden on Georgia’s working families, improving education for Georgia’s children, and ensuring that all Georgians are better off now than they were four years ago.”
In addition, another important fact to note is that the House Democratic Caucus were none too happy at the ethics complaint filed by then-Georgia Democratic Party chairman Bobby Kahn. According to a report by Atlanta Journal-Constitution political reporter Jim Galloway, Democrats did not plan on challenging Richardson in the 2007 Speaker’s election. However, they were compelled to after the charges were filed by Kahn. [SOURCE]
As was said in a previous thread, House Democratic Leader DuBose Porter (D – Dublin) and the rest of the Democratic Caucus bear as much responsibility for Richardson being Speaker as the Republicans that nominated him for a second and third two-year term
Here’s that first SOURCE again.
Apologies to the confused readers.
Does the General Assembly have subpoena powers? Can anyone be “made” to testify at any committee meeting? According to the Georgia State Constitution the answer is no.
How can a committee do an investigation if they cannot subpoena people to testify?
Eric Johnson. A man with the most convenient set of morals this side of the Mississippi who can turn his “moral convictions” on like a light switch. One minute he’s a good Christian soldier, the next minute he’s lying, cheating and stealing. While scandals and corruption were the soup de jour down at the Gold Dome, Ethics Chairman Johnson busily swept them under the rug so as not to face the scrutiny from his own issues and transgressions.
That’s an OK analogy except for the fact that it would be difficult to sweep soup under a rug.
Soup?
Barf?
Spew?
Human excrement?
Slime?
Scum?
I like the post, Si.
I guess it’s a great analogy for the same reason. (You can’t sweep it all under the rug.)
To paraphrase Bob Hope who used to say “thanks for the memories”… to Eric Johnson we say, “thanks for the scandals”.
Promoting you to be Governor would be like promoting a prisoner to be warden just because he was in jail. It doesn’t make sense and neither does your candidacy.
Georgia needs new leadership.
Is there any Republican that would be acceptable to you? Care to elaborate on Johnson’s issues and transgressions?
Has anyone read this?
http://alt.cimedia.com/ajc/complaint.pdf
“It is common knowledge that Speaker Richardson engaged in a
personal relationship with a lobbyist for the utility advocating passage of the bill.”
That’s all the proof the guy provided? Just stating that is was common knowledge? And you nut-heads wanted the Ethics Committee to start dragging people in to testify about who slept with who?!?!?!?
What am I missing here? Doesn’t seem anything was done because Mrs. Richardson was holding all the cards.
Yeah, if you limit your knowledge to a single document, it does seem rather flimsy, doesn’t it?
Where are the other documents that were given to the ethics committee at that time?
You seriously mean you don’t remember the day after day articles in the AJC about the affair? That’s what’s called “common knowledge”, since everyone in the corridors of the capitol were snickering about it (if they weren’t scared of being caught in the same position).
I’m not for witch-hunts based on rumors. “Common knowledge” means that the rumors were wide known. Again, Mrs. Richardson had the proof and didn’t provide it. Now that she has provided it, he’s gone. To have wasted tax payer’s money in the mean-time would have been unjustified.
fundy,
I’ve filed a complaint or two. Supplied hard documents. Lists of witnesses. Knowing the complaint would die.
Did it to make the information public. Putting together a good package of material can take months especially when gathering information from the Securities and Exchange Commission, the FDIC, and the Federal Reserve.
Let me mention that even when I got documents, information was redacted. I had to pay for the documents. I had to ‘barter’ for and accept less than I asked for. And the State of Georgia refused to release ‘banking’ information because the ‘files’ were sealed.
Unless I wanted to sue them, … of course.
So giving hard copy documents to Johnson means nothing. He looks first for dismissal. Maybe just lazy.
I’ve always thought the story would be more interesting had AGL actually gotten the pipeline and the lobbyist was still employed there.
I heard the Speaker had been video recorded by a GOP operative ‘without his shoes on’ in a public venue with the lobbyist.
The affair was freaken public not just common knowledge.
Inquiring minds want to know what you ‘heard.’
The drunken Speaker was recorded on a cell phone with his shoes off doing a standing dance just off the dance floor from a GOP …. we’ll call it an event.
Comments on this entry are closed.