Profiles in Courage: SB 16 Version

March 5, 2009 0:42 am

by Icarus · 30 comments

There are quite a few “Profiles in Courage” to be distributed today in the Senate. SB 16, the bill to allow local jurisdictions to decide if local community standards would support local sales of alcohol on Sundays died a coward’s death without receiving a vote in the Senate Regulated Industries Committee.

Unlike last week, when the committee failed to meet for lack of a quorum, there were 11 of 13 committee members present when the meeting was gaveled to order. Chairman David Shafer called SB 16 for the first agenda item and announced that Senator Seth Harp would have some final comments on the bill and then there would be a vote. Instead, Senator Harp withdrew the bill, without any advance notice to the committee members.

Two Senators were absent from the meeting. Senator Ed Harbison was excused for family matters. But Senator Eric Johnson, still a co-sponsor of the bill despite rumors (and the assurance to Pat Tippett and Kay Godwin of the newly formed “Conservatives in Action”) that he would remove his co-sponsorship, was absent.

It could have hardly been more convenient for Senator Johnson to have attended the meeting, as he had attended the Senate Rules Committee meeting immediately prior to the Regulated Industries Committee meeting, held in the SAME ROOM.

Harp complained to media outside the room of his inability to get a vote, but Chairman Shafer told Senator Harp during the meeting that his withdrawal of the bill did not preclude the committee’s action. Harp insisted there be no vote.

While Shafer (who I am on record as supporting in the Lt. Gov’s race) is taking heat for there being no vote, Shafer had called the bill for a vote, and in fact, the bill passed through Shafer’s committee before it was stopped in Rules last year. With Rules Chairman Don Balfour as a co-sponsor this year, getting a successful vote from Regulated Industries would have meant that the bill had a better than average chance of reaching the Senate floor.

But Senator Johnson, who co-sponsored this bill, couldn’t risk support in the Lt. Governor’s race if that happened. So he took a walk. Casey Cagle has continued to play Hamlet with the issue, finally issuing the bold statement that he “wouldn’t stand in the way” of the bill, but hasn’t seemed terribly interested in getting his Senators to show up for votes. And Senator Harp himself, while feigning frustration with his inability to get a vote, withdrew the bill with no warning. Harp is believed to be supporting Johnson in the Lt. Gov’s race, and the withdrawal of the bill seems to be designed to make it appear that Shafer would not grant a vote, while protecting co-sponsor Johnson who wouldn’t appear to put himself on the record.

Further complicating matters is Governor Perdue, who has previously stated that he would veto the bill if passed, but has been mostly quiet as both the House and the Senate go through their ritualized torture of trying to move this legislation.

At the end of the day, it is another high profile failure for the Senate. There has been a distinct lack of leadership by the man who would be Governor, with one who would be Lt. Gov being AWOL. Senator Harp owes all of us an explanation of his decision to pull this bill, and if there was pressure from the Lt. Governor or Senator Johnson to do so. I doubt this answer is forthcoming.

This is supposed to be the non-election year cycle, where things actually get done. If we’re going to play election year politics like this now, the 2010 legislative session promises to be absolutely excruciating.

{ 30 comments }

griftdrift March 5, 2009 at 1:49 am

After the Genarlow Wilson idiocy, my chance of voting for Eric Johnson was not much.

As of today, much just left the building.

Dark Knight Begins March 5, 2009 at 4:38 am

I say let them keep doing this kind of crap.

Just makes my job recruiting for the Libertarian Party that much easier, and it makes it even easier to convince people to vote for us in Nov 2010.

SB 31 may have been complex and not very visible, I’ll grant the legislators that.

SB 16 was the exact opposite on both counts.

Howard Roark March 5, 2009 at 6:35 am

Eric Johnson stands no chance in NE Georgia.

debbie0040 March 5, 2009 at 7:38 am

I really don’t see the logic in opposing the bill. Alcohol is already sold on Sundays in restaurants..

Groseclose March 5, 2009 at 7:55 am

I believe Sen. Johnson was in the contemperaneous 4:00pm State and Local Government Operations Committee presenting the “Recreate Milton County” Bill.

tocallaghan March 5, 2009 at 8:24 am
Dave Bearse March 5, 2009 at 8:41 am

What is the source of the information, “Instead, Senator Harp withdrew the bill, without any advance notice to the committee members”? It may well have been in the AJC but if it was it escaped my notice.

Ramblinwreck March 5, 2009 at 8:57 am

Amazing. Not surprising but amazing given the future political aspirations of some of these guys. Do they think that wussing out on controversial issues is a display of leadership that will earn them respect and a higher office?

Decaturguy March 5, 2009 at 8:58 am

These Republicans in Georgia are nothing but a bunch of big government loving Communists.

Dark Knight Begins March 5, 2009 at 9:04 am

Decaturguy:

Actually, they’re big government loving fascists.

Big difference. (Heck, so big that Stalin and Hitler – who as a team truly could have proven unstoppable – were enemies.)

Bucky Plyler March 5, 2009 at 9:34 am

The events described by Icarus happen almost weekly in the Dome. They also happened just l;ike this when the D’s were in charge. I don’t think this issue belongs on a hill to die on. There are many other more important issues to get fired up about.

Dark Knight Begins March 5, 2009 at 9:35 am

Bucky:

Any time freedom is infringed, it is a hill to die on.

Bucky Plyler March 5, 2009 at 9:40 am

DK,

It’s called discernment-without it you can’t be effective.

Dark Knight Begins March 5, 2009 at 9:45 am

Bucky:

It is called principle. Without it, you shouldn’t be leading.

drjay March 5, 2009 at 9:47 am

i don’t think critisizing sen johnson over this issue is fair, nor do i think the railing against his school choice bill b/c it is not perfect, when he has been working very hard o do something other than leave the status quo is very fair either

Bucky Plyler March 5, 2009 at 10:13 am

DK,

I have been crystal clear on the issue of SB16. If it had passed and I was a poster- I probably would not have been saying anything about it.

Remember that I wear the label of conservative Christian proudly, and I really don’t care that there are many folks in GA that think I should not have a voice or influence in politics. (particularly in the Rep. party) (If you think about it -that should fire me up more!)

Freedom, discernment, principle- let me give you some issues that should fire you up if you believe in these things like you say you do.

*Any issue of life, the protection of it, and the sanctity of it- Yet, bills that lean this direction die EVERY session in committee under the Dome. R’s or D’s in charge-it makes no difference.
* Reducing taxes-fees, size of state gov’t- same as above
* Budgets that reflect the 2nd issue in thinking & planning-same as above

I could come up with more. It seems to me that SB16 doesn’t reach those standards. (even though I’m glad it’s dead)

Icarus March 5, 2009 at 10:22 am

@ Dr. Jay, I would be interested in why you believe this is unfair to Sen. Johnson.

@Bucky, I agree this is not a hill to die on. SB 31 has much greater implications for everyday Georgians, and I’ve spent a lot more words cautioning that it also is not a hill to die on. There are very few bills that ever would be standing alone. What I am advocating is that people pay attention to these small hills, and decide where to build the mountains.

As for the other bills that receive this gamesmanship, you are 100% correct. And if there’s ever a bill you believe is not getting proper coverage here, for either its content or for the games being played to make the public feel action is being taken where it clearly is all political theater, drop a note to the tipline, or email it to me directly. I’ll make sure it gets the attention it deserves.

Buzzfan March 5, 2009 at 10:25 am

Ah, yes, the same Eric Johnson that wasted legislative time last session trying to block Gator tags from being issued in Georgia (and waiving the annoying vanity plate surcharge revenue they bring to the coffers).

*woof*

I wouldn’t vote EJ for county bumpkin using the ballot of a dead Ohioan.

Bucky Plyler March 5, 2009 at 10:25 am

Icarus,

Agreed. Thanks.

drjay March 5, 2009 at 11:01 am

from what i understand EJ was at another meeting for another important issue yesterday,

and as far as the vouchers bill–jeb bush has a very nice editorial in the sav’h paper that is more eloquent than any of te drivel i could put forth i can post a link if you like

Icarus March 5, 2009 at 11:15 am

Dr. Jay,

Scheduling conflicts are common at the Capitol. But he was a co-sponsor of this bill, and I’ll give him a pass for missing last week’s meeting. Yesterday, however, he apparently made a conscious decision to drop in and check on the progress of Milton County instead of being in a very visible committee meeting for a vote on a bill that he is co-sponsor of. He made a choice not to appear, and, given the press leading up to this meeting, shouldn’t be surprised to feel some heat for his absence.

MouthoftheSouth March 5, 2009 at 11:28 am

Agreed to above as to Eric Johnson, but it is Schaefer’s committee, if he wanted it to get through it would have. Additionally, stating that Harp’s withdrawal didn’t mean they couldn’t vote is fine, but then they didn’t vote! Shaefer never brought it to a vote, and so there it died, a bill the majority of the state wants, many fervently, in the name of what? Temperance? Fear? Ineptitude? There would have been a lot of super-embarrassed no votes in both the committee and on the floor if this had been brought to a vote in either, and the Republicans wanted to let their colleagues save face, to allow them to bury those same faces in fried PB&J.

Groseclose March 5, 2009 at 12:13 pm

He and Shafer are both sponsors of the Milton bill. Someone needed to be in the other committee meeting to introduce it. Not sure why that wasn’t Moody (the third sponsor), but I am guessing North Fulton (would-be-Milton) is more important in the LG electoral dynamic than those dispersed supporters of Sunday sales.

Daniel N. Adams March 5, 2009 at 3:19 pm

I say let them keep doing this kind of crap.

Just makes my job recruiting for the Libertarian Party that much easier, and it makes it even easier to convince people to vote for us in Nov 2010.

I too love the unique situation we have today; DNC in charge in DC and the GOP in charge in GA… and to anyone paying attention will see little difference in both their charges to grow government influence in our daily lives and limit personal freedom. They may have minor nuanced differences, but as for the BIG picture, little difference, for BIG GOVERNMENT and power over the people is their cause.

Booray March 5, 2009 at 4:06 pm

Let’s see:

Shafer is chairman of the committee that never passed this bill in three years, with the one exception of the time he was ordered to pass it out as a bone to the supporters (when Senate leadership planned to kill it all along in Rules after that point).

Shafer killed the bill in last week’s committee by adjourning in only 30 seconds when the votes were present in the room to pass the bill and only one more senator was needed to make a quorum.

Shafer did zilch on this bill in about 20 meetings in last year’s session.

Yet, because Johnson misses one meeting (that it appears everyone knew was fixed ahead of time) to present a bill that actually has a chance of passing in another committee – it’s all really Johnson’s fault.

Failure, Shaferistas. As in failure to get the big plot. Y’all keep wasting your time on silly web attacks and stupid games with serious legislation like SB16 and you’ll also taste failure in the LG’s race…

saltynuts March 5, 2009 at 5:29 pm

Booray? Bulls***.

“the committee that never passed this bill in three years, with the one exception of the time he was ordered to pass it out” So in the same sentence you say the committee never passed, then that they did pass it once. Strike One.

“Shafer killed the bill in last week’s committee by adjourning in only 30 seconds when the votes were present in the room to pass the bill ” There were exactly three Senators in the room when Shafer adjourned. That’s four short of a quorum. You either weren’t there or you saw people who the rest of us couldn’t. Strike Two.

“Johnson misses one meeting.” Johnson missed two meetings. Strike Three.

Who’s paying you to flack for the boozers and Eric Johnson?

saltynuts March 5, 2009 at 5:35 pm

Booray = BS

“Shafer is chairman of the committee that never passed this bill in three years, with the one exception of the time he was ordered to pass it out”

So the committee never passed it out except for the one time they passed it out? Strike One.

“Shafer killed the bill in last week’s committee by adjourning in only 30 seconds when the votes were present in the room to pass the bill and only one more senator was needed to make a quorum.”

There were exactly three Senators in the room – none of them were Eric Johnson. A quorum is seven members. Either you weren’t there or you were seeing “invisible senators” that nobody else saw. Sounds like you’ve been tippling? Strike Two.

“Johnson misses one meeting” Wrong. He missed both of the meetings that his bill was scheduled for. Strike Three.

Question for Booray – who’s paying you to flack for the boozers and Eric Johnson?

Booray March 5, 2009 at 7:27 pm

Ain’t flacking for nobody, except to keep my job. Just a Forsyth County guy with a bunch of friends in the General Assembly. Amazing that you Shaferistas would try to blame a single member of the committee who wasn’t there for one meeting where a vote wasn’t held for the outcome – but not the chairman. I’m no homer for Johnson, who has his own issues, but Shafer’s been my senator before, and I learned his smoke-and-mirrors trick a long time ago.

politicalwidow March 5, 2009 at 7:36 pm

Shafer is nothing if he isn’t lying and conniving all the time. Someone else is in the mix on this too, but it is not Eric Johnson. Of course the Shafer crew is going to blame him for this so they can use it against him in the LG campaign.

politicalwidow March 5, 2009 at 7:40 pm

Johnson probably knew that Seth Harp was planning to withdraw the bill anyway.

Comments on this entry are closed.