<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is the Georgia Public Policy Foundation So Defensive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:52:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161790</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161790</guid>
		<description>Name-calling?  Yeahhh..that&#039;s nothing the Ga Power lobbyists implanted in the minds of some of those folks giving their &quot;impassioned&quot; speeches on the floor of the House Thursday, did they?

The lobbyists whispered (or, hell, wrote the damn speeches for them) things like:

&quot;Whoever is against this bill hates Georgia Power.&quot;

&quot;Whoever is against this bill is against nuclear power.&quot;

&quot;Whoever is against this bill wants to put people out of work.&quot;

Etc., etc., etc.

&quot;Name-calling&quot; vs. &quot;pathologically lying&quot;...I wonder which is worse, hmm, Mr. Donnie-be-good?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Name-calling?  Yeahhh..that&#8217;s nothing the Ga Power lobbyists implanted in the minds of some of those folks giving their &#8220;impassioned&#8221; speeches on the floor of the House Thursday, did they?</p>
<p>The lobbyists whispered (or, hell, wrote the damn speeches for them) things like:</p>
<p>&#8220;Whoever is against this bill hates Georgia Power.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Whoever is against this bill is against nuclear power.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Whoever is against this bill wants to put people out of work.&#8221;</p>
<p>Etc., etc., etc.</p>
<p>&#8220;Name-calling&#8221; vs. &#8220;pathologically lying&#8221;&#8230;I wonder which is worse, hmm, Mr. Donnie-be-good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dash Riptide</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161787</link>
		<dc:creator>Dash Riptide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161787</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;But the worst thing about some of you guys here is that you can’t have a conversation about anything with anyone who disagrees with you without it degrading into name calling (and that’s something I corrected with my children when they were in elementary school). And you wonder why the GPPF hasn’t responded?&lt;/em&gt;

Please point out where I called you names so I can apologize.

You ignored my last post because you know that I  have thoroughly decoded your kung fu. Instead you respond only to those who you can enrage to the point of name-calling. On an objective level you&#039;ve failed to score any points at all, but that&#039;s neither here nor there. All you were really trying to do is to solicit ad hominem attacks so you could claim victory in the effort to discredit the entire Noah&#039;s Ark full of SB 31 detractors as a bunch of hot-headed nutjobs.  I&#039;m not sure what that really accomplishes since what you are doing is so transparent, but enjoy your &quot;victory&quot; just the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>But the worst thing about some of you guys here is that you can’t have a conversation about anything with anyone who disagrees with you without it degrading into name calling (and that’s something I corrected with my children when they were in elementary school). And you wonder why the GPPF hasn’t responded?</em></p>
<p>Please point out where I called you names so I can apologize.</p>
<p>You ignored my last post because you know that I  have thoroughly decoded your kung fu. Instead you respond only to those who you can enrage to the point of name-calling. On an objective level you&#8217;ve failed to score any points at all, but that&#8217;s neither here nor there. All you were really trying to do is to solicit ad hominem attacks so you could claim victory in the effort to discredit the entire Noah&#8217;s Ark full of SB 31 detractors as a bunch of hot-headed nutjobs.  I&#8217;m not sure what that really accomplishes since what you are doing is so transparent, but enjoy your &#8220;victory&#8221; just the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndyInjun</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161784</link>
		<dc:creator>IndyInjun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161784</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;GPPF got into a sticky situation&lt;/i&gt;

The Georgia Public Policy Foundation is now in the discredited category. It is unimaginable that GPPF can have any credibility for unbiased evaluation of any issue after blowing this one. Then, to top it off, they seem to think that they can stonewall any explantion of their incredible omission.

GPPF is now in the same league as the CNBC crowd who are stone-silent after their GE bosses reneged on a pledge to maintain the dividend, only to cut it by 67%. They are in the same league as Isakson, who swore accountability for TARP, only to now cry about being deceived.

Do your own research. Kudos to Icarus and the PPunditeers who took the time to jump on this one. 

Don&#039;t believe those PREVIOUSLY entrusted to represent the public interest. They stand on dung legs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>GPPF got into a sticky situation</i></p>
<p>The Georgia Public Policy Foundation is now in the discredited category. It is unimaginable that GPPF can have any credibility for unbiased evaluation of any issue after blowing this one. Then, to top it off, they seem to think that they can stonewall any explantion of their incredible omission.</p>
<p>GPPF is now in the same league as the CNBC crowd who are stone-silent after their GE bosses reneged on a pledge to maintain the dividend, only to cut it by 67%. They are in the same league as Isakson, who swore accountability for TARP, only to now cry about being deceived.</p>
<p>Do your own research. Kudos to Icarus and the PPunditeers who took the time to jump on this one. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe those PREVIOUSLY entrusted to represent the public interest. They stand on dung legs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonnieChaffin</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161781</link>
		<dc:creator>DonnieChaffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161781</guid>
		<description>Bill, you&#039;re the one who said Georgia Power doesn&#039;t want their stock price to go up, which is ridiculous beyond belief. I played along with your faulty logic and tried to explain why that might be true. I was simply trying to be as humorous as you&#039;ve been and didn&#039;t realize you had no sense of humor.

And your &quot;lessons&quot; on finance are really cute...mostly things my children knew when they were in middle school. I&#039;m sure they taught you things about finance at Georgia State that I&#039;ll never know and I have respect for those who apply themselves and get an education. But in your case, the rubber doesn&#039;t appear to be meeting the road.

But the worst thing about some of you guys here is that you can&#039;t have a conversation about anything with anyone who disagrees with you without it degrading into name calling (and that&#039;s something I corrected with my children when they were in elementary school). And you wonder why the GPPF hasn&#039;t responded?

Anyway, I&#039;ll go away and let y&#039;all repair the break in your circle. Have a nice life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, you&#8217;re the one who said Georgia Power doesn&#8217;t want their stock price to go up, which is ridiculous beyond belief. I played along with your faulty logic and tried to explain why that might be true. I was simply trying to be as humorous as you&#8217;ve been and didn&#8217;t realize you had no sense of humor.</p>
<p>And your &#8220;lessons&#8221; on finance are really cute&#8230;mostly things my children knew when they were in middle school. I&#8217;m sure they taught you things about finance at Georgia State that I&#8217;ll never know and I have respect for those who apply themselves and get an education. But in your case, the rubber doesn&#8217;t appear to be meeting the road.</p>
<p>But the worst thing about some of you guys here is that you can&#8217;t have a conversation about anything with anyone who disagrees with you without it degrading into name calling (and that&#8217;s something I corrected with my children when they were in elementary school). And you wonder why the GPPF hasn&#8217;t responded?</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;ll go away and let y&#8217;all repair the break in your circle. Have a nice life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gt7348b</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161779</link>
		<dc:creator>gt7348b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161779</guid>
		<description>Despite their differences on the bill, they&#039;ve both Republicans long before it is was popular as far as I&#039;ve heard.  Nothing to do with SB 31 in particular.  On the surface, I can see how people could disagree and how GPPF got into a sticky situation, but still I tend to respect those who&#039;ve been Republicans since before it was popular vs. those like our gov who seemed to change parties because they realized they would always be second class Ds &#039;cause they&#039;re stupid enough to to say Ï can&#039;t put my assets in a trust and hire a management company.&quot; Please.

I respect those Republicans who&#039;ve always been Republicans liek Chambers, in spite of their current differences with the the current so called Republican leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite their differences on the bill, they&#8217;ve both Republicans long before it is was popular as far as I&#8217;ve heard.  Nothing to do with SB 31 in particular.  On the surface, I can see how people could disagree and how GPPF got into a sticky situation, but still I tend to respect those who&#8217;ve been Republicans since before it was popular vs. those like our gov who seemed to change parties because they realized they would always be second class Ds &#8217;cause they&#8217;re stupid enough to to say Ï can&#8217;t put my assets in a trust and hire a management company.&#8221; Please.</p>
<p>I respect those Republicans who&#8217;ve always been Republicans liek Chambers, in spite of their current differences with the the current so called Republican leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161771</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161771</guid>
		<description>Whoa...why was Cagle just thrown in with Jill Chambers?  Casey Cagle was for SB 31, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa&#8230;why was Cagle just thrown in with Jill Chambers?  Casey Cagle was for SB 31, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161770</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161770</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So now it was the Southern Company’s intention to lower its stock price so it wouldn’t have to pay out as much in dividends, which means they can operate with less money and then the PSC will force them to lower their rates…which means these reactors will be free. &lt;/i&gt;

Dude...#1, HUH?

#2, WTF? (Google that one, Dope fiend)

For your info, Stock Price is not usually related to dividends.  Dividends are money paid-out of a company&#039;s net income.  Stock price is a free-unit in the stock market.

YIELD is calculated by dividing dividends per share by stock price per share.

If the stock price increases and dividends do not increase at the same rate, the YIELD DECREASES.

Donnie...you&#039;re an idiot.  That&#039;s all I gotta say.  You don&#039;t know jack about the stock market, corporate finance, or anything.  Your whackjob interpretation of what I said demonstrates that you do not have the IQ potential to BEGIN to understand these things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So now it was the Southern Company’s intention to lower its stock price so it wouldn’t have to pay out as much in dividends, which means they can operate with less money and then the PSC will force them to lower their rates…which means these reactors will be free. </i></p>
<p>Dude&#8230;#1, HUH?</p>
<p>#2, WTF? (Google that one, Dope fiend)</p>
<p>For your info, Stock Price is not usually related to dividends.  Dividends are money paid-out of a company&#8217;s net income.  Stock price is a free-unit in the stock market.</p>
<p>YIELD is calculated by dividing dividends per share by stock price per share.</p>
<p>If the stock price increases and dividends do not increase at the same rate, the YIELD DECREASES.</p>
<p>Donnie&#8230;you&#8217;re an idiot.  That&#8217;s all I gotta say.  You don&#8217;t know jack about the stock market, corporate finance, or anything.  Your whackjob interpretation of what I said demonstrates that you do not have the IQ potential to BEGIN to understand these things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gt7348b</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161765</link>
		<dc:creator>gt7348b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161765</guid>
		<description>Game Fan - you&#039;re right.  Which is why I&#039;m no longer a Republican.  They are no longer the party I joined of small government, fiscal sanity, and accountability.  Any more, they have nothing to offer but strategy and soundbites with no ideas of how to confront today&#039;s problems except with yesterdays solutions.  And I say this as a product of a family who&#039;s been Republican in Georgia since the &#039;40s.  

Today&#039;s Republicans in Georgia are nothing more than second class Democrats who couldn&#039;t make it in the traditional politics with the primary exceptions being Rep Chambers and Lt. Gov Cagle and anyone else who was a Republican before 1990.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Game Fan &#8211; you&#8217;re right.  Which is why I&#8217;m no longer a Republican.  They are no longer the party I joined of small government, fiscal sanity, and accountability.  Any more, they have nothing to offer but strategy and soundbites with no ideas of how to confront today&#8217;s problems except with yesterdays solutions.  And I say this as a product of a family who&#8217;s been Republican in Georgia since the &#8217;40s.  </p>
<p>Today&#8217;s Republicans in Georgia are nothing more than second class Democrats who couldn&#8217;t make it in the traditional politics with the primary exceptions being Rep Chambers and Lt. Gov Cagle and anyone else who was a Republican before 1990.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161758</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161758</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid Republicans have become that which we hated.   Taxers, spenders, control-a-holics, crooks-and-liars, internal rot, ect...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid Republicans have become that which we hated.   Taxers, spenders, control-a-holics, crooks-and-liars, internal rot, ect&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndyInjun</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161738</link>
		<dc:creator>IndyInjun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161738</guid>
		<description>We are in the days of the second Age of the Robber Barons in America. 

Donnie and Georgia Power are contemptuous of the people. 

There is a double top in on arrogance.

The people of America and Georgia are about to rise up and throw all of these bums out and their lackeys too. Their excesses have grown too great and the pain on the people too onerous.

The spirit that founded this nation  is not dead. 

A trust buster is coming, for the vast middle class is not going to sit by and be exterminated, which is the current game plan.

As for GPPF, they got caught doing totally deficient work, got called on it, now hope to dissemble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are in the days of the second Age of the Robber Barons in America. </p>
<p>Donnie and Georgia Power are contemptuous of the people. </p>
<p>There is a double top in on arrogance.</p>
<p>The people of America and Georgia are about to rise up and throw all of these bums out and their lackeys too. Their excesses have grown too great and the pain on the people too onerous.</p>
<p>The spirit that founded this nation  is not dead. </p>
<p>A trust buster is coming, for the vast middle class is not going to sit by and be exterminated, which is the current game plan.</p>
<p>As for GPPF, they got caught doing totally deficient work, got called on it, now hope to dissemble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dash Riptide</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161737</link>
		<dc:creator>Dash Riptide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161737</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;So now it was the Southern Company’s intention to lower its stock price so it wouldn’t have to pay out as much in dividends, which means they can operate with less money and then the PSC will force them to lower their rates…which means these reactors will be free.&lt;/em&gt;

You&#039;re obviously putting those words in his mouth.  Bill said nothing close to that, and what he did say is dead on.  Why would you even attempt this sort of gross extrapolation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>So now it was the Southern Company’s intention to lower its stock price so it wouldn’t have to pay out as much in dividends, which means they can operate with less money and then the PSC will force them to lower their rates…which means these reactors will be free.</em></p>
<p>You&#8217;re obviously putting those words in his mouth.  Bill said nothing close to that, and what he did say is dead on.  Why would you even attempt this sort of gross extrapolation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonnieChaffin</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161736</link>
		<dc:creator>DonnieChaffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161736</guid>
		<description>Bill, I had to google Two-Buck Chuck to find out what that was. And I googled &quot;beer pong&quot; while I was over there. I&#039;m learning all kinds of things talking to you guys (I guess I need to hang out with undisciplined college kids and winos more often).

So now it was the Southern Company&#039;s intention to lower its stock price so it wouldn&#039;t have to pay out as much in dividends, which means they can operate with less money and then the PSC will force them to lower their rates...which means these reactors will be free. Those guys are geniuses. Thank God for SB 31. I&#039;m back on the floor laughing again.

Honestly though Bill, if nobody else calls you on this ridiculous logic, I don&#039;t know why anybody reads the comments here...maybe for the comic relief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, I had to google Two-Buck Chuck to find out what that was. And I googled &#8220;beer pong&#8221; while I was over there. I&#8217;m learning all kinds of things talking to you guys (I guess I need to hang out with undisciplined college kids and winos more often).</p>
<p>So now it was the Southern Company&#8217;s intention to lower its stock price so it wouldn&#8217;t have to pay out as much in dividends, which means they can operate with less money and then the PSC will force them to lower their rates&#8230;which means these reactors will be free. Those guys are geniuses. Thank God for SB 31. I&#8217;m back on the floor laughing again.</p>
<p>Honestly though Bill, if nobody else calls you on this ridiculous logic, I don&#8217;t know why anybody reads the comments here&#8230;maybe for the comic relief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dash Riptide</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161735</link>
		<dc:creator>Dash Riptide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161735</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;the average Georgian’s opportunity cost for money is 14% (wish I could earn that return on my investments)&lt;/em&gt;

That&#039;s not ridiculous. The average Georgian carries a credit card balance that they can&#039;t pay off immediately. For them the opportunity lost is the opportunity to &quot;invest&quot; in a lower credit card balance, which would save them double digit interest month after month thereafter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>the average Georgian’s opportunity cost for money is 14% (wish I could earn that return on my investments)</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not ridiculous. The average Georgian carries a credit card balance that they can&#8217;t pay off immediately. For them the opportunity lost is the opportunity to &#8220;invest&#8221; in a lower credit card balance, which would save them double digit interest month after month thereafter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161734</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161734</guid>
		<description>Donnie,

Two YEARS before dividends come.  Besides all that, if it is &quot;5% yield&quot; (that I keep reading by you) that Southern Company wants to &quot;ensure&quot; Granma and Grandpa receive on their investment, the LAST thing they want to happen is to run-up the stock price.  Because, as I&#039;m sure an ace-finance Dude like you knows, the higher the stock price, the less the dividend yield.

Go back to drinking your Two-Buck Chuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donnie,</p>
<p>Two YEARS before dividends come.  Besides all that, if it is &#8220;5% yield&#8221; (that I keep reading by you) that Southern Company wants to &#8220;ensure&#8221; Granma and Grandpa receive on their investment, the LAST thing they want to happen is to run-up the stock price.  Because, as I&#8217;m sure an ace-finance Dude like you knows, the higher the stock price, the less the dividend yield.</p>
<p>Go back to drinking your Two-Buck Chuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonnieChaffin</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161733</link>
		<dc:creator>DonnieChaffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161733</guid>
		<description>BS. That&#039;s completely ridiculous. The people who make a living in the markets almost always know about these decisions in advance, particularly in this case where the fix was in before the bill ever went to the House. Does anybody anywhere think the governor is not going to sign the bill? Do you really think the market is waiting on an official announcement? I fell out of my chair laughing on that one. I appreciate the entertainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BS. That&#8217;s completely ridiculous. The people who make a living in the markets almost always know about these decisions in advance, particularly in this case where the fix was in before the bill ever went to the House. Does anybody anywhere think the governor is not going to sign the bill? Do you really think the market is waiting on an official announcement? I fell out of my chair laughing on that one. I appreciate the entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161732</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161732</guid>
		<description>&quot;The “herd mentality” refers to a diverse group that gets united for whatever reason and acts irrationally…like rioters and looters who would not normally act in such a way in other circumstances.&quot;

Actually I think you&#039;re referring to &quot;mob mentality&quot;, as in irrational and angry violence, such as looting or a lynching.    As far as &quot;herd mentality&quot;, this would be like &quot;sheeple&quot; or lemmings.  Following the crowd off a cliff.  I don&#039;t think most of the bloggers fit into either category here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The “herd mentality” refers to a diverse group that gets united for whatever reason and acts irrationally…like rioters and looters who would not normally act in such a way in other circumstances.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually I think you&#8217;re referring to &#8220;mob mentality&#8221;, as in irrational and angry violence, such as looting or a lynching.    As far as &#8220;herd mentality&#8221;, this would be like &#8220;sheeple&#8221; or lemmings.  Following the crowd off a cliff.  I don&#8217;t think most of the bloggers fit into either category here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161729</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161729</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I keep hearing how this was such a major screwover for ratepayers and a coup for stockholders. If true, you would think this major windfall would have caused a run on the stock. But it lost 2% yesterday and another 1% today. So maybe the market expected this decision and had already adjusted for it. Nope, it was trading at close to 38 at the end of 2008 and now it’s below 31. Why do you think that is?&lt;/i&gt;

Because the bill hasn&#039;t:

1) Been signed yet by the Governor
2) Been announced to the stock market that the bill has been passed
3) Hasn&#039;t been analyzed by the traders and analysts who will consume the info WHEN the bill gets signed and WHEN the law takes effect.
4) May still not cause a run-up in stock price BECAUSE the dividends will not start paying-off until 2011.

Yeah, we&#039;re &quot;children&quot;, Donnie.  We don&#039;t no whut we be tawking about wen it cums to thangs like the stock markit and FY-nance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I keep hearing how this was such a major screwover for ratepayers and a coup for stockholders. If true, you would think this major windfall would have caused a run on the stock. But it lost 2% yesterday and another 1% today. So maybe the market expected this decision and had already adjusted for it. Nope, it was trading at close to 38 at the end of 2008 and now it’s below 31. Why do you think that is?</i></p>
<p>Because the bill hasn&#8217;t:</p>
<p>1) Been signed yet by the Governor<br />
2) Been announced to the stock market that the bill has been passed<br />
3) Hasn&#8217;t been analyzed by the traders and analysts who will consume the info WHEN the bill gets signed and WHEN the law takes effect.<br />
4) May still not cause a run-up in stock price BECAUSE the dividends will not start paying-off until 2011.</p>
<p>Yeah, we&#8217;re &#8220;children&#8221;, Donnie.  We don&#8217;t no whut we be tawking about wen it cums to thangs like the stock markit and FY-nance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atlantaman</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161728</link>
		<dc:creator>atlantaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161728</guid>
		<description>I think if your going to criticize GPPF, then you have to look at GA Watch on the other end.  GA Watch is basically a campaign arm for Roy Barnes, who happens to be the chair of GA Watch.  Over the last few weeks I&#039;ve heard ridiculous statements about GA Power having 70 lobbyists lobbying for SB31, trucks being bought for legislators, 100% of the advanced payment went to their profit, the average Georgian&#039;s opportunity cost for money is 14% (wish I could earn that return on my investments), it guarantees a profit for GA Power and it shifts all the risk to the consumer.  A number of legislators feel GA Watch and the anti-nukes are behind these statements.

I think the bill has some issues, mainly should we be paying upfront payments in such a bad economy, but a lot of SB31 was twisted into more than it really was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if your going to criticize GPPF, then you have to look at GA Watch on the other end.  GA Watch is basically a campaign arm for Roy Barnes, who happens to be the chair of GA Watch.  Over the last few weeks I&#8217;ve heard ridiculous statements about GA Power having 70 lobbyists lobbying for SB31, trucks being bought for legislators, 100% of the advanced payment went to their profit, the average Georgian&#8217;s opportunity cost for money is 14% (wish I could earn that return on my investments), it guarantees a profit for GA Power and it shifts all the risk to the consumer.  A number of legislators feel GA Watch and the anti-nukes are behind these statements.</p>
<p>I think the bill has some issues, mainly should we be paying upfront payments in such a bad economy, but a lot of SB31 was twisted into more than it really was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gt7348b</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161725</link>
		<dc:creator>gt7348b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161725</guid>
		<description>I believe the question on this post is whether GPPF is feeling a little defensive.  I think the answer is probably yes in that their materials got used in a way they never intended and, additionally, the concerns they raised were ignored by the decision makers.  Having sometimes been in a similar position myself, I can understand the defensiveness and know it is an extremely frustrating position to be in.  However, I do think it would probably help if GPPF actually answered Icarus&#039; question in bold: 

Was the GPPF aware of the provision to allow Georgia Power to recoup their ROI, in effect, charge the consumers for profits on a plant not yet constructed, in the amount of a Billion dollars?

Not responding directly usually just allows an issue to fester until it blows up in other ways - like a pointless discussion about a herd mentality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the question on this post is whether GPPF is feeling a little defensive.  I think the answer is probably yes in that their materials got used in a way they never intended and, additionally, the concerns they raised were ignored by the decision makers.  Having sometimes been in a similar position myself, I can understand the defensiveness and know it is an extremely frustrating position to be in.  However, I do think it would probably help if GPPF actually answered Icarus&#8217; question in bold: </p>
<p>Was the GPPF aware of the provision to allow Georgia Power to recoup their ROI, in effect, charge the consumers for profits on a plant not yet constructed, in the amount of a Billion dollars?</p>
<p>Not responding directly usually just allows an issue to fester until it blows up in other ways &#8211; like a pointless discussion about a herd mentality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonnieChaffin</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/02/27/why-is-the-georgia-public-policy-foundation-so-defensive/comment-page-1/#comment-161717</link>
		<dc:creator>DonnieChaffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=12782#comment-161717</guid>
		<description>The only way they&#039;ve inflicted harm is if they&#039;ve taken money away from you that wouldn&#039;t have been taken if this bill had not been passed. Do you really believe that? I believe that Georgia Power is a government-protected monopoly that is going to make a somewhat fixed profit. If they don&#039;t make a profit because they&#039;ve got money tied up in these reactors, they&#039;ll run to the PSC with a rate increase, the PSC will rubber stamp it and they&#039;ll get your money anyway. If there&#039;s some aspect to that equation that&#039;s in error, I&#039;m listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way they&#8217;ve inflicted harm is if they&#8217;ve taken money away from you that wouldn&#8217;t have been taken if this bill had not been passed. Do you really believe that? I believe that Georgia Power is a government-protected monopoly that is going to make a somewhat fixed profit. If they don&#8217;t make a profit because they&#8217;ve got money tied up in these reactors, they&#8217;ll run to the PSC with a rate increase, the PSC will rubber stamp it and they&#8217;ll get your money anyway. If there&#8217;s some aspect to that equation that&#8217;s in error, I&#8217;m listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

