Tomorrow, we will witness one of the great events in human history. Yes, an African-American will be inaugurated president for the first time since America’s founding — and I’ll get to that momentarily — but that’s not what I’m referring to here.
What I’m talking about here is far more underrated, and far more consistently historic. You see, tomorrow we will witness that rarest of political occurrences: the peaceful, non-dynastic transfer of power over the mightiest country in the world, yet again, from the outgoing leader of the past eight years to the incoming leader of at least the next four.
The fact that America’s transitions from president to president are so regular, so peaceful, and so orderly has led us to take for granted this occurrence which, in the context of human history, is an incredibly rare and spectacular event.
This is far more rare, and far more amazing, an occurrence than we ever give it credit for. The ancient pioneers of democracy whose tradition we are carrying (and building) on were not able to continue such a tradition.
The legendary democracy of classical Athens, for example, took over a century to establish, then underwent fits and starts during its century and a half of existence, ceding preeminence to tyranny after Solon’s early 6th century tenure, to an an oligarchy during the late-5th century Peloponnesian war, and ending in Macedonian monarchy after the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC.
Rome’s fragmented republican system lasted longer (around 400 years if the traditional founding date of 509 BC is accepted), but it endured more upheaval and violence than the halting Athenian system, finally ending in the 3/4-century long inferno of repeated proscriptions, tyrannicide, and seemingly endless civil war.
Barack Hussein Obama’s accession to the presidency is not being met by military mobilization, riots, or widespread conspiratorial assassination attempts. In fact, it’s not even being met with the protests, the threats of violence, and the widespread claims of “he’s not my President!” which were directed at the last recipient of presidential power eight (and again four) years ago, when we came the closest we have in living memory to breaking our historic cycle of peaceful, non-antagonistic transitions.
Tomorrow’s inauguration of the 44th President of the United States (and the first African-American president) will demonstrate two things above all else:
- That America, its citizens, and its leaders still respect the rites of democratic succession to such a degree that, for the 42nd time, we have had our electoral say and as a result power is changing hands peacefully, with (despite the far Left’s paranoid claims of the last eight years) no armies being marched on The Mall and no last-ditch attempts being made by the outgoing leader to hold onto power or to keep the presidency within his dynastic line; and
- That the idea of racism as an institution imposing a glass (or steel) ceiling on the level to which African-Americans can rise is as dead as Nathan Bedford Forrest himself.
Building on #2 above, allow me now to change gears to address the race issue.
The inauguration of Barack Hussein Obama as the 44th President of the United States of America shows once and for all that the identity politics and categorical identification and treatment of Americans according to race, religion, and gender — which has for so long been a key tool in the Left’s political toolkit — is both outdated and irrelevant.
With the swearing-in of a racial minority to the highest office in the world, attempts to supposedly make up for past transgressions by implementing race-based quota systems, rather than actually allowing minorities to succeed on their own merits without the cloud of racial favoritism and “white guilt”-induced pity hanging over their heads, should be recognized as the irrelevant mechanisms of outcome equality that they are, and should be left by the wayside with “separate but equal” and other similarly outdated doctrines.
America as a whole crossed the threshold into a largely “colorblind” society years ago. Unfortunately, as is their wont, politicians and government (particularly on the left side of the aisle) have lagged far behind their countrymen in this area, and have continued insisting on identifying, categorizing, and regulating Americans by their race and gender, rather than by their common humanity.
This will not immediately cease to be the case with tomorrow’s inauguration — but it should, and, with the accession of an African-American to the presidency for the first time in U.S. history, there is no longer any excuse for it not to.
{ 20 comments }
Jeff
He aint my president.
Tomorrow culminates MLK’s dream’s of blacks being treated equally with Obama being inaugurated as our 44th President of the United States. I’ll be listening to the Inauguration on my Scanner.
I would say that Obama’s election is a major point in the struggle that MLK was a part of. There are probably still a number of waves of reaction in both majority and minority communities yet to play out.
I think on the macro this is true for people under 45 and it grows via youth.
“America as a whole crossed the threshold into a largely “colorblind” society years ago”.
Chris,
Fair ’nuff. If the President of the United States of America “ain’t your president,” then, to respond in kind, “you ain’t an American.”
He’s my President. Looking at it through the prism of possible Democrat cabinet picks, some of them really haven’t been that bad. There is a bit of a fairy tale aspect to the whole race thing that gets a little old, but I suppose it gives people hope. Keep in mind were talking about a 1/2 white man, without an ounce of slave blood from an immigrant father, who was originally criticized as being too white from black leaders. Once folks started to realize he had a chance he became the second coming of MLK and Abe Lincoln combined, all with an unremarkable couple of years as US Senator and few terms as a State Senator.
“Tomorrow’s inauguration of the 44th President of the United States (and the first African-American president)”
More true than most imagine:
http://www.obamacrimes.info/thebirthcertificate2.html
The only thing of significance that will happen tomorrow is that the Dow will fall another 100 or 200 points. All the blacks packed into DC will do nothing to stop the freefall to third-world status…we are screwed.
Here’s my Market perspective. I feel that the Market has not bottomed out yet. With Obama’s coming in, there will be a feeling of confidence and the Markets will, over the span of 2 or so months, rise 5000 points. Then when jobs reports come out, over the span of 2 or so months, the Market will drop by half and then some. By the end of the Summer, expect to see the Dow at around 4000. By next year, we could be in a Depression.
Everybody ready to get numbered, stamped, printed and pissed off? (If you have a gun that is.)
Big Brother’s new target: Tracking of all firearms
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=86039
And guess where this guy is from?
If you said the South side of Chicago you win a cupie doll. (former Black Panther no less)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Rush
Today will be an opportunity for me to teach about our form of government using the following video. http://www.wimp.com/thegovernment/
NGI – rise 500 or 5000 pts?
I could see a psychological bounce from the inauguration, after all Paulson will be gone, but not 5000 points. Obama’s stimulus, like the WPA, will do jacks–t to help the economy. After a brief bout of deflation, a rapid inflationary cycle will begin as the Fed is politically pressured not to sink the money they’ve lent, but to use it to prop up the budget.
Eventually, our debt burden will become unbearable and the political discussion will turn to repudiation. That will be the ultimate breaking of the social contract that was Social Security and Medicare. With the entitlements gone from the budget and the economy in tatters, rebuilding can begin. Then, and only then, will people start to listen to the Hard Money theories of Ron Paul and his supporters.
You are entitled to your opinion Jeff. At least until the PC police change that. However as America becomes more socialistic, less tolerant of achievement (other than based on skin color), openly hostile to economic success, as well as lazy and dependent on Bread and Circuses, I don’t really feel insulted to be called Anti-American.
You do make a valid point about the peaceful transfer of power. It is the historical exception, not the rule. And as we watch the Democrats call for investigations and prosecutions of Bush and officials in his administration, I wonder too if this will soon pass.
For the one reason there is peaceful transfer of power in this country is that those departing don’t feel the need to start a civil war in self defense. Should Obama, Pelosi and Reid decided to hold a proscription to satisfy their mob of supporters, then this too will pass. And I’ll have one less reason to care about being called unamerican.
Harry, the Dow fell over 6000 points under a GOP President (though I am not certain this is what you are trying to poke at).
Chris, Jeff is correct. If Obama is not your president…then you are not an American.
I am very pleased that I have the opportunity to say that I am in complete agreement with Mr. Emanuel. Watching our nation’s leadership pass peacably from one president to the next is the true wonder of a Presidential Inauguration.
These keen remarks and observations made by Mr. Emanuel definitely earn a tip of my hat.
GC, the Dow fell 3,000 of those 6,000 points under the anticipation of political and demographic changes in this country that are, and will be, detrimental to formation of wealth. The remainder 3,000 was due to bad policy decisions (subprime lending etc) that were promoted by past and current Democratic politicians, and were not opposed with sufficient vigor by GOP politicians and a GOP administration.
Furthermore, Chris…knock it off.
“less tolerant of acheivement, openly hostile to economic success”…are you talking about your “conservative” version of hypercapitalism that has actually allowed for a dissolution of the maximin principles are nation has been built upon.
Progress is needed in our country…on economic, political and social fronts (as well as everything in between).
Our government’s job is to represent and “insert Preamble to the Constitution here” for the People. The People as a collective, not as a group of individuals. Individuals are well protected and given all the rights that are bestowed upon them in nature…and, hopefully, are provided a stable society, by our government, in which they might further perfect their abilities and talents.
This means a progression of open opportunities…aka that thing you mistakenly call socialism. I will add that is the believers in your ideology didn’t mess everything up…there would be no need for a shift in the paradigm of our government’s economic involvement.
Look at the progress we have made since the Constitutional Convention…on all fronts. Knowledge doubles nearly every year now. Our constitution was created with an incredible amount of flexibility to allow for change. It is a written document, which is an important consideration to make….but what many so call “conservatives” seem to forget is that our founders knew what they were doing when they put the Preamble into that document.
You, chris, maybe happy with a tyrant you agree with…but true Americans are most happy with a representative government that they are skeptical of or even dislike. Such is the nature of the Democratic Republic of the United States of America.
“You, chris, maybe happy with a tyrant you agree with…”
Haven’t read many of Chris’s posts, have you?
Icarus,
That line was a metaphor.
Simile, metaphor, whatever,
Chis isn’t happy with anything.
(not sure he’s really able to agree with anything, either…)
I’m happy the President of the United States can speak in complete sentences.
Comments on this entry are closed.