<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal appeals court to again hear CONVICTED MURDERER Troy Davis case Dec. 9</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/20/federal-appeals-court-to-again-hear-convicted-murderer-troy-davis-case-dec-9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/20/federal-appeals-court-to-again-hear-convicted-murderer-troy-davis-case-dec-9/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:13:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Comma Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/20/federal-appeals-court-to-again-hear-convicted-murderer-troy-davis-case-dec-9/comment-page-1/#comment-146582</link>
		<dc:creator>The Comma Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10168#comment-146582</guid>
		<description>The same jury that found Davis guilty and recommended that his sentence be death heard some of these conflicting stories from the witnesses.  What they didn&#039;t hear is not admissible in court as these &quot;recantations&quot; are not sworn statements and the makers of the purported statements are not willing to testify to verify their stories.  Many of these documents were either created after all the appeals were done or presented to previous appellate courts for them to review.

The interesting thing is that if the conviction is overturned, the new DA will have to decide if this case should be prosecuted again...a decision that could easily destroy some fragile alliances and relationships in Savannah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same jury that found Davis guilty and recommended that his sentence be death heard some of these conflicting stories from the witnesses.  What they didn&#8217;t hear is not admissible in court as these &#8220;recantations&#8221; are not sworn statements and the makers of the purported statements are not willing to testify to verify their stories.  Many of these documents were either created after all the appeals were done or presented to previous appellate courts for them to review.</p>
<p>The interesting thing is that if the conviction is overturned, the new DA will have to decide if this case should be prosecuted again&#8230;a decision that could easily destroy some fragile alliances and relationships in Savannah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogue109</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/20/federal-appeals-court-to-again-hear-convicted-murderer-troy-davis-case-dec-9/comment-page-1/#comment-146524</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogue109</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10168#comment-146524</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why should we be extremely cautious in sanctioning the killing of a citizen!&lt;/i&gt;

How many times should we let him appeal the SAME ARGUMENT?  

This SAME issue has already gone all the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States.  Now, with NOTHING new, we&#039;re starting it all over again!

Again, there is no new argument.  So, again, how many times should be be allowed to appeal to courts which have already denied him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why should we be extremely cautious in sanctioning the killing of a citizen!</i></p>
<p>How many times should we let him appeal the SAME ARGUMENT?  </p>
<p>This SAME issue has already gone all the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States.  Now, with NOTHING new, we&#8217;re starting it all over again!</p>
<p>Again, there is no new argument.  So, again, how many times should be be allowed to appeal to courts which have already denied him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rugby fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/20/federal-appeals-court-to-again-hear-convicted-murderer-troy-davis-case-dec-9/comment-page-1/#comment-146515</link>
		<dc:creator>rugby fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10168#comment-146515</guid>
		<description>Why should we be extremely cautious in sanctioning the killing of a citizen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should we be extremely cautious in sanctioning the killing of a citizen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Vet</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/20/federal-appeals-court-to-again-hear-convicted-murderer-troy-davis-case-dec-9/comment-page-1/#comment-146495</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Vet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10168#comment-146495</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s so much more convenient, not to mention much cheaper, to execute an innocent person every now and then than to fool around with these appeals. Let&#039;s just let the district attorney decide whether or not the conviction is valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so much more convenient, not to mention much cheaper, to execute an innocent person every now and then than to fool around with these appeals. Let&#8217;s just let the district attorney decide whether or not the conviction is valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
