<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Want to know who the Republicans are supporting?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:27:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dash Riptide</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146694</link>
		<dc:creator>Dash Riptide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146694</guid>
		<description>As stated in her letter to GCA, what it says is that Doyle feels &quot;that it would not be appropriate for [her] to respond to [Georgia Christian Alliance&#039;s] Questionnaire or similar questionnaires that ask for responses to hypothetical issues that may come before [her] as a judge[.]&quot; Now if you can show that Georgia Equality&#039;s questionnaire also asks for responses to hypothetical issues that may come before her as a judge, then you have a point. Otherwise all you&#039;re showing is that Doyle wanted to talk to any constituency that would listen as long as they didn&#039;t ask inappropriate questions. Because GCA&#039;s questions definitely cross the line, and because Sheffield answered them anyway, he will sink or swim with the support of rabid pro-lifers, pandering Republican politicians, misogynists and the generally uninformed. That&#039;s a disturbingly strong coalition in Georgia, however, so keep your chin up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated in her letter to GCA, what it says is that Doyle feels &#8220;that it would not be appropriate for [her] to respond to [Georgia Christian Alliance's] Questionnaire or similar questionnaires that ask for responses to hypothetical issues that may come before [her] as a judge[.]&#8221; Now if you can show that Georgia Equality&#8217;s questionnaire also asks for responses to hypothetical issues that may come before her as a judge, then you have a point. Otherwise all you&#8217;re showing is that Doyle wanted to talk to any constituency that would listen as long as they didn&#8217;t ask inappropriate questions. Because GCA&#8217;s questions definitely cross the line, and because Sheffield answered them anyway, he will sink or swim with the support of rabid pro-lifers, pandering Republican politicians, misogynists and the generally uninformed. That&#8217;s a disturbingly strong coalition in Georgia, however, so keep your chin up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie0040</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146692</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie0040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146692</guid>
		<description>I am confident that Sheffield would not be an activist judge. I believe that Doyle would and that is why she has the support of most Democrats and liberal groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confident that Sheffield would not be an activist judge. I believe that Doyle would and that is why she has the support of most Democrats and liberal groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie0040</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146691</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie0040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146691</guid>
		<description>Sara Doyle would not answer a questionaire from Christian alliance but she did answer a questionaire from Georgia Equality.  That says a lot about her beliefs.  It was very hypocritical of her to answer Georgia Equality&#039;s but not Christian Alliance&#039;s questionaire. I could understand her reasoning had she refused to answer both, but she did not.

Here is Doyle&#039;s reasoning in a letter to Fields.
http://www.gachristianalliance.org/docs/2008_voter_guide_sdoyle.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sara Doyle would not answer a questionaire from Christian alliance but she did answer a questionaire from Georgia Equality.  That says a lot about her beliefs.  It was very hypocritical of her to answer Georgia Equality&#8217;s but not Christian Alliance&#8217;s questionaire. I could understand her reasoning had she refused to answer both, but she did not.</p>
<p>Here is Doyle&#8217;s reasoning in a letter to Fields.<br />
<a href="http://www.gachristianalliance.org/docs/2008_voter_guide_sdoyle.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.gachristianalliance.org/docs/2008_voter_guide_sdoyle.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dash Riptide</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146655</link>
		<dc:creator>Dash Riptide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146655</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;A judge does not need to know the law by heart to be a judge. Both Mike and Sarah would have clerks to help them look up the law to help them write their opinions.&lt;/em&gt;

That&#039;s putting it mildly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A judge does not need to know the law by heart to be a judge. Both Mike and Sarah would have clerks to help them look up the law to help them write their opinions.</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s putting it mildly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shep1975</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146653</link>
		<dc:creator>shep1975</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146653</guid>
		<description>As one of the people working to bring up John Marshall, thanks DoubleDawg for the encouragement. I will remind everyone we have been producing Georgia attorneys for 75 years. Our alumni include Judge James Bodiford who is presiding over the Nichols trial, State Rep. Doug Collins, Gwinnett Judge James Oxendine (father of Commissioner Ox), Neal Boortz, Cobb Solicitor General Barry Morgan, etc.

For those like me who are not fresh out of undergrad and wanted to get a JD, there really is only 2 choices, Georgia State and JMLS.

We have a new Dean who has come to us after heading up Pepperdine&#039;s Law Scool. Pepperdine replaced Richard Lynn with an unknown attorney named Ken Starr. My Legal Writing Professor was Gwinnett State Court Judge Randy Rich.

Back to the topic at hand, I will be sending out a press release confirming that the 11th Congressional District Republican Committee endorsed Sheffield for the Court of Appeals.

While a lot of Republican attorneys I respect very highly are supporting Sarah Doyle, personally, I believe Sheffield is the better experienced for the position. He has spent his career in court and has been practicing law since Sarah Doyle was 6 years old. 

This is not a legislative postion, but one that does require experience as to the issues that face when coming into court. 

A judge does not need to know the law by heart to be a judge. Both Mike and Sarah would have clerks to help them look up the law to help them write their opinions. Mike&#039;s experience comes in with decades of dealing with the rules and procedures of the court system itself and insights that can only be gained going in from of hundreds of judges over the years and seeing the good and bad points of them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one of the people working to bring up John Marshall, thanks DoubleDawg for the encouragement. I will remind everyone we have been producing Georgia attorneys for 75 years. Our alumni include Judge James Bodiford who is presiding over the Nichols trial, State Rep. Doug Collins, Gwinnett Judge James Oxendine (father of Commissioner Ox), Neal Boortz, Cobb Solicitor General Barry Morgan, etc.</p>
<p>For those like me who are not fresh out of undergrad and wanted to get a JD, there really is only 2 choices, Georgia State and JMLS.</p>
<p>We have a new Dean who has come to us after heading up Pepperdine&#8217;s Law Scool. Pepperdine replaced Richard Lynn with an unknown attorney named Ken Starr. My Legal Writing Professor was Gwinnett State Court Judge Randy Rich.</p>
<p>Back to the topic at hand, I will be sending out a press release confirming that the 11th Congressional District Republican Committee endorsed Sheffield for the Court of Appeals.</p>
<p>While a lot of Republican attorneys I respect very highly are supporting Sarah Doyle, personally, I believe Sheffield is the better experienced for the position. He has spent his career in court and has been practicing law since Sarah Doyle was 6 years old. </p>
<p>This is not a legislative postion, but one that does require experience as to the issues that face when coming into court. </p>
<p>A judge does not need to know the law by heart to be a judge. Both Mike and Sarah would have clerks to help them look up the law to help them write their opinions. Mike&#8217;s experience comes in with decades of dealing with the rules and procedures of the court system itself and insights that can only be gained going in from of hundreds of judges over the years and seeing the good and bad points of them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Ga Indy</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146652</link>
		<dc:creator>North Ga Indy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146652</guid>
		<description>“Mike is a great guy and would make a great judge.”

Agreed!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Mike is a great guy and would make a great judge.”</p>
<p>Agreed!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146651</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146651</guid>
		<description>For the record, John Kerry was ALSO a &quot;former prosecutor.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, John Kerry was ALSO a &#8220;former prosecutor.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146650</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146650</guid>
		<description>Debbie Sez: &lt;i&gt;&quot;Mike is a great guy and would make a great judge.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Right....and Debbie said the same thing about ASH, Ralph Reed, and many other people.

I&#039;m not interested in &quot;great guys&quot; being judges.  I am interested in SANE people being judges.  By SANE, I mean those types NOT prone to being yanked by any agenda...and, especially the agenda of the far-right religious groups who have proven time and time again to be ANTI-FREEDOM OF RELIGION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debbie Sez: <i>&#8220;Mike is a great guy and would make a great judge.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Right&#8230;.and Debbie said the same thing about ASH, Ralph Reed, and many other people.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not interested in &#8220;great guys&#8221; being judges.  I am interested in SANE people being judges.  By SANE, I mean those types NOT prone to being yanked by any agenda&#8230;and, especially the agenda of the far-right religious groups who have proven time and time again to be ANTI-FREEDOM OF RELIGION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie0040</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146629</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie0040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146629</guid>
		<description>http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2008/10/15/appeals_court_election.html?cxntlid=inform_artr

Seven candidates running for appeals court opening
By BILL RANKIN

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Wednesday, October 15, 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2008/10/15/appeals_court_election.html?cxntlid=inform_artr" rel="nofollow">http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2008/10/15/appeals_court_election.html?cxntlid=inform_artr</a></p>
<p>Seven candidates running for appeals court opening<br />
By BILL RANKIN</p>
<p>The Atlanta Journal-Constitution</p>
<p>Wednesday, October 15, 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dash Riptide</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146621</link>
		<dc:creator>Dash Riptide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146621</guid>
		<description>Noted Republicans Randy Evans and Charles Bannister support professed Republican Mike Sheffield? Seriously?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noted Republicans Randy Evans and Charles Bannister support professed Republican Mike Sheffield? Seriously?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie0040</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146618</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie0040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146618</guid>
		<description>Liberals like activist judges, conservatives don&#039;t..  

I have a tremendous respect for Randy Evans and he supports Sheffield.
Supporters: Republican Party general counsel Randy Evans, Gwinnett County Commission Chairman Charles Bannister.


Mike Sheffield
College: Wake Forest University


Law school: Emory University


Professional: Sole practitioner in Lawrenceville


Pitch: A former prosecutor and now a criminal defense attorney, Sheffield says he is well regarded by his peers, having been elected president of the DeKalb and Gwinnett bar associations. He says he was wrongly denied the chance to be in a runoff for a appeals court judgeship in 2004 when a new election was ordered because an opponent’s name was incorrectly listed on ballots in Laurens County.


Quote: “I’ll always wonder what would have happened [in the 2004 race], if they’d only counted those ballots.”


Supporters: Republican Party general counsel Randy Evans, Gwinnett County Commission Chairman Charles Bannister.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberals like activist judges, conservatives don&#8217;t..  </p>
<p>I have a tremendous respect for Randy Evans and he supports Sheffield.<br />
Supporters: Republican Party general counsel Randy Evans, Gwinnett County Commission Chairman Charles Bannister.</p>
<p>Mike Sheffield<br />
College: Wake Forest University</p>
<p>Law school: Emory University</p>
<p>Professional: Sole practitioner in Lawrenceville</p>
<p>Pitch: A former prosecutor and now a criminal defense attorney, Sheffield says he is well regarded by his peers, having been elected president of the DeKalb and Gwinnett bar associations. He says he was wrongly denied the chance to be in a runoff for a appeals court judgeship in 2004 when a new election was ordered because an opponent’s name was incorrectly listed on ballots in Laurens County.</p>
<p>Quote: “I’ll always wonder what would have happened [in the 2004 race], if they’d only counted those ballots.”</p>
<p>Supporters: Republican Party general counsel Randy Evans, Gwinnett County Commission Chairman Charles Bannister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dash Riptide</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146615</link>
		<dc:creator>Dash Riptide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146615</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The fact liberals oppose Mike Sheffield makes him more appealing.&lt;/em&gt; 

I like the way you think. Years ago the fact that liberals opposed Pol Pot made me realize that maybe he wasn&#039;t such a bad guy after all. Of course, you could say that opposing Pol Pot was a bipartisan position, but to some extent the same could be said of Sara Doyle. So regardless of any hints of unity within the legal community for one candidate or another, what really matters is that liberals have made their choice and we must stand against them. Go &lt;strike&gt;Pol Pot&lt;/strike&gt; Mike Sheffield!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The fact liberals oppose Mike Sheffield makes him more appealing.</em> </p>
<p>I like the way you think. Years ago the fact that liberals opposed Pol Pot made me realize that maybe he wasn&#8217;t such a bad guy after all. Of course, you could say that opposing Pol Pot was a bipartisan position, but to some extent the same could be said of Sara Doyle. So regardless of any hints of unity within the legal community for one candidate or another, what really matters is that liberals have made their choice and we must stand against them. Go <strike>Pol Pot</strike> Mike Sheffield!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie0040</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146614</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie0040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146614</guid>
		<description>The fact liberals oppose Mike Sheffield makes him more appealing. Mike is a great guy and would make a great judge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact liberals oppose Mike Sheffield makes him more appealing. Mike is a great guy and would make a great judge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Ga Indy</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146611</link>
		<dc:creator>North Ga Indy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146611</guid>
		<description>Go Mike Sheffield!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Mike Sheffield!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146599</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146599</guid>
		<description>Bill,

The only thing I want to hear a judge say is &quot;I will follow the laws passed by the legislature and signed by the governor to the best of my ability except when they conflict with the State or Federal Constitutions.&quot;

Justice is not joining the bench with the intent to &quot;fight for families&quot; or &quot;protect business&quot;.  Justice is making sure that even the rights of jerks and infamous are protected.  Unfortunately, no one in the position to become judge seems willing to set aside partisan leanings and actually do the job a judge is supposed to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>The only thing I want to hear a judge say is &#8220;I will follow the laws passed by the legislature and signed by the governor to the best of my ability except when they conflict with the State or Federal Constitutions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Justice is not joining the bench with the intent to &#8220;fight for families&#8221; or &#8220;protect business&#8221;.  Justice is making sure that even the rights of jerks and infamous are protected.  Unfortunately, no one in the position to become judge seems willing to set aside partisan leanings and actually do the job a judge is supposed to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romegaguy</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146595</link>
		<dc:creator>Romegaguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146595</guid>
		<description>This is scary, I&#039;m agreeing with Bill on something... Doyle is definitely the better candidate, not that it takes much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is scary, I&#8217;m agreeing with Bill on something&#8230; Doyle is definitely the better candidate, not that it takes much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146583</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146583</guid>
		<description>Good!  I don&#039;t like &quot;cause&quot; people as my judges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good!  I don&#8217;t like &#8220;cause&#8221; people as my judges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie0040</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146580</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie0040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146580</guid>
		<description>From Georgia Equality:&quot;“Two of our candidates for judge, Tangela Berrie in the DeKalb Superior Court race and Sara Doyle in the Georgia Court of Appeals race will be facing opponents in the runoff. “

She would not get such a ringing endorsement from them for just saying no to discrimination.   I understand that she refused to fill out questionaires from conservative groups but did for GA Equality. That speaks volumes.

http://www.dailyreportonline.com/Editorial/News/singleEdit.asp?individual_SQL=9/29/2008@26400

&quot;According to online campaign contribution records, Doyle has backed a mix of candidates. She gave $200 to Perdue&#039;s campaign in 2000—and similarly modest donations to state Sen. M. Kasim Reed, an Atlanta Democrat and fellow Holland &amp; Knight partner, and Ashley S. Harris, a lawyer and unsuccessful Democratic primary challenger for the state Legislature in 2006. She also made a $50 donation to the campaign of then-Supreme Court Chief Justice Norman Fletcher&#039;s 2002 re-election campaign. Doyle has said she declined to answer the sort of issue questionnaires—from Georgia Right to Life and the Georgia Christian Alliance—that some conservative candidates have answered in the past. &quot;

Then there are her comments below from Fulton County Daily Report:

http://www.dailyreportonline.com/Editorial/News/singleEdit.asp?individual_SQL=9/29/2008@26400

&quot;But a closer look at Doyle&#039;s candidacy shows a blurrier political picture. The candidate says voters would be wrong to assume she&#039;s a Republican. “I don&#039;t think that politics should play a role in the judicial elections,” says Doyle. She says she&#039;s “not a cause person.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Georgia Equality:&#8221;“Two of our candidates for judge, Tangela Berrie in the DeKalb Superior Court race and Sara Doyle in the Georgia Court of Appeals race will be facing opponents in the runoff. “</p>
<p>She would not get such a ringing endorsement from them for just saying no to discrimination.   I understand that she refused to fill out questionaires from conservative groups but did for GA Equality. That speaks volumes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyreportonline.com/Editorial/News/singleEdit.asp?individual_SQL=9/29/2008@26400" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailyreportonline.com/Editorial/News/singleEdit.asp?individual_SQL=9/29/2008@26400</a></p>
<p>&#8220;According to online campaign contribution records, Doyle has backed a mix of candidates. She gave $200 to Perdue&#8217;s campaign in 2000—and similarly modest donations to state Sen. M. Kasim Reed, an Atlanta Democrat and fellow Holland &amp; Knight partner, and Ashley S. Harris, a lawyer and unsuccessful Democratic primary challenger for the state Legislature in 2006. She also made a $50 donation to the campaign of then-Supreme Court Chief Justice Norman Fletcher&#8217;s 2002 re-election campaign. Doyle has said she declined to answer the sort of issue questionnaires—from Georgia Right to Life and the Georgia Christian Alliance—that some conservative candidates have answered in the past. &#8221;</p>
<p>Then there are her comments below from Fulton County Daily Report:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyreportonline.com/Editorial/News/singleEdit.asp?individual_SQL=9/29/2008@26400" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailyreportonline.com/Editorial/News/singleEdit.asp?individual_SQL=9/29/2008@26400</a></p>
<p>&#8220;But a closer look at Doyle&#8217;s candidacy shows a blurrier political picture. The candidate says voters would be wrong to assume she&#8217;s a Republican. “I don&#8217;t think that politics should play a role in the judicial elections,” says Doyle. She says she&#8217;s “not a cause person.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146567</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146567</guid>
		<description>Sow,

No, I also did not say Mercer grads are unethical.  One of the reasons you butted up against me is because you repeatedly put words in my mouth and try to argue against made up boogey men instead of actually reading what I wrote.  My discussion was with mws in the first place, which you butted into.  But, yes, this discussion is tiresome, so let&#039;s agree to never mention it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sow,</p>
<p>No, I also did not say Mercer grads are unethical.  One of the reasons you butted up against me is because you repeatedly put words in my mouth and try to argue against made up boogey men instead of actually reading what I wrote.  My discussion was with mws in the first place, which you butted into.  But, yes, this discussion is tiresome, so let&#8217;s agree to never mention it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SOWEGA_GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/19/want-to-know-who-the-republicans-are-supporting/comment-page-2/#comment-146566</link>
		<dc:creator>SOWEGA_GOP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=10163#comment-146566</guid>
		<description>Double Dawg, 

I completely agree. Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Double Dawg, </p>
<p>I completely agree. Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
