<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes Saxby, It Is True</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-145198</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-145198</guid>
		<description>Doug,

Lemme know how that works out once the US Treasury bankrupts the companies and buys them for pennies on the dollar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug,</p>
<p>Lemme know how that works out once the US Treasury bankrupts the companies and buys them for pennies on the dollar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icarus</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-145197</link>
		<dc:creator>Icarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-145197</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m still elligible.  I just lost 45 million points.  

But it was all worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m still elligible.  I just lost 45 million points.  </p>
<p>But it was all worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rugby fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-145194</link>
		<dc:creator>rugby fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-145194</guid>
		<description>Deal in &#039;10. 

For the Adults!

Icarus was the other candidate. Has he dropped out? What are his feelings on another candidate who is for the children?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deal in &#8217;10. </p>
<p>For the Adults!</p>
<p>Icarus was the other candidate. Has he dropped out? What are his feelings on another candidate who is for the children?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-145182</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-145182</guid>
		<description>Chris,

I am going to practice reverse Galtism.  That is, I will buy the tanked investments that Galtists leave behind and profit greatly when they return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>I am going to practice reverse Galtism.  That is, I will buy the tanked investments that Galtists leave behind and profit greatly when they return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-145151</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-145151</guid>
		<description>John,

As a practitioner of Galtism, I&#039;m not spending anymore or helping to do anything positive for the economy or the United States for the next four years. Right now, the best thing we can do is sit on our hands, stop creating wealth(*), and deny it to Obama to spread around.

(*) Yes, I know, only Keyesians thing buying drinks stimulate the economy. I&#039;m not investing domestically either.

(Edited to add, Oh, I see you were referring to Doug&#039;s comment. my bad).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>As a practitioner of Galtism, I&#8217;m not spending anymore or helping to do anything positive for the economy or the United States for the next four years. Right now, the best thing we can do is sit on our hands, stop creating wealth(*), and deny it to Obama to spread around.</p>
<p>(*) Yes, I know, only Keyesians thing buying drinks stimulate the economy. I&#8217;m not investing domestically either.</p>
<p>(Edited to add, Oh, I see you were referring to Doug&#8217;s comment. my bad).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Konop</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-145144</link>
		<dc:creator>John Konop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-145144</guid>
		<description>Chris

As a fiscal conservative I hope you are buying the drinks during happy hour to save money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris</p>
<p>As a fiscal conservative I hope you are buying the drinks during happy hour to save money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shep1975</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-145140</link>
		<dc:creator>shep1975</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-145140</guid>
		<description>Saxby was making bad decisions before he hired Charlie Harmon. That being said, Saxby&#039;s worst bad decision is still a lot better than Martin&#039;s best good decision. 

That&#039;s if you think raising taxes is a good decision, then Martin is your man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saxby was making bad decisions before he hired Charlie Harmon. That being said, Saxby&#8217;s worst bad decision is still a lot better than Martin&#8217;s best good decision. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s if you think raising taxes is a good decision, then Martin is your man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-145134</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-145134</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sullivan, Cole, Yglesias, Will, and Noonan&quot;

I&#039;m surprised you didn&#039;t include Ann Coulter in yoru list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sullivan, Cole, Yglesias, Will, and Noonan&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t include Ann Coulter in yoru list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndyInjun</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-144748</link>
		<dc:creator>IndyInjun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-144748</guid>
		<description>Sullivan, Cole, Yglesias, Will, and Noonan all are taking y&#039;all apart using the PRINCIPLES of the GOP.

Until you FIND SOME PRINCIPLES that folks can see you adhering to, what are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sullivan, Cole, Yglesias, Will, and Noonan all are taking y&#8217;all apart using the PRINCIPLES of the GOP.</p>
<p>Until you FIND SOME PRINCIPLES that folks can see you adhering to, what are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndyInjun</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-144747</link>
		<dc:creator>IndyInjun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-144747</guid>
		<description>It seems quite a WAR is breaking out all over regarding who qualifies as a REPUBLICAN and a CONSERVATIVE. 

How is it, Erick, that you have launched some sort of witch hunt against Republicans who won&#039;t support Palin and NONE against a Republican that eviscerated every line of the Republican party platform?

What ARE YOU?

The standards of the Republican party clearly put you outside of the Republican party.

What are ANY of you?

You ain&#039;t conservatives.

And you ain&#039;t Republicans.

Give me your list of guiding principles that prove me wrong - one that your leaders Bush and Saxby have not violated and which has been promulgated by the party.

I am waiting.
Read Sullivan, Yglesias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems quite a WAR is breaking out all over regarding who qualifies as a REPUBLICAN and a CONSERVATIVE. </p>
<p>How is it, Erick, that you have launched some sort of witch hunt against Republicans who won&#8217;t support Palin and NONE against a Republican that eviscerated every line of the Republican party platform?</p>
<p>What ARE YOU?</p>
<p>The standards of the Republican party clearly put you outside of the Republican party.</p>
<p>What are ANY of you?</p>
<p>You ain&#8217;t conservatives.</p>
<p>And you ain&#8217;t Republicans.</p>
<p>Give me your list of guiding principles that prove me wrong &#8211; one that your leaders Bush and Saxby have not violated and which has been promulgated by the party.</p>
<p>I am waiting.<br />
Read Sullivan, Yglesias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-144743</link>
		<dc:creator>Three Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-144743</guid>
		<description>bill, if america&#039;s last hope of avoiding decline into gsIII is saxby chambliss, it&#039;s too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bill, if america&#8217;s last hope of avoiding decline into gsIII is saxby chambliss, it&#8217;s too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-144708</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-144708</guid>
		<description>Bill, 

Great Society III,

GS2 was George W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, </p>
<p>Great Society III,</p>
<p>GS2 was George W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-144693</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-144693</guid>
		<description>3-Jack,

Is the prospect of avoiding having a Great Society II for the next 30 years a good enough reason to hold your nose and vote for Saxby?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3-Jack,</p>
<p>Is the prospect of avoiding having a Great Society II for the next 30 years a good enough reason to hold your nose and vote for Saxby?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-144670</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-144670</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;offering to buy everyone in the state a round of drinks if he is wrong.&lt;/i&gt;
A drink of water. 

Still, by 2010, that may be a pretty major feat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>offering to buy everyone in the state a round of drinks if he is wrong.</i><br />
A drink of water. </p>
<p>Still, by 2010, that may be a pretty major feat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-144653</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-144653</guid>
		<description>John,

This is not a mere write-in campaign.  Farris has personally guarenteed a landslide victory against Johnny, offering to buy everyone in the state a round of drinks if he is wrong.

Quite a bold statement, that I have been trying to talk him out of, but you know how confident and stubborn R.B. Farris can be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>This is not a mere write-in campaign.  Farris has personally guarenteed a landslide victory against Johnny, offering to buy everyone in the state a round of drinks if he is wrong.</p>
<p>Quite a bold statement, that I have been trying to talk him out of, but you know how confident and stubborn R.B. Farris can be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Konop</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-144633</link>
		<dc:creator>John Konop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-144633</guid>
		<description>Chris

We have the write in Farris for Kids campaign going strong!

We have the write in Farris for Kids campaign going strong!


We are asking a one dollar donation on every drink during happy hour to finance the message. Please give until you puke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris</p>
<p>We have the write in Farris for Kids campaign going strong!</p>
<p>We have the write in Farris for Kids campaign going strong!</p>
<p>We are asking a one dollar donation on every drink during happy hour to finance the message. Please give until you puke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-144618</link>
		<dc:creator>Three Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-144618</guid>
		<description>bill, it means that conservatives have no candidate in the race leaving only the fear factor as a motivation to vote against martin. that&#039;s not enough for me to hold my nose again while voting for another rino.

imho, many conservatives are tired of simply voting against the liberal agenda. the gop needs to put forth candidates running for something instead of against the other party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bill, it means that conservatives have no candidate in the race leaving only the fear factor as a motivation to vote against martin. that&#8217;s not enough for me to hold my nose again while voting for another rino.</p>
<p>imho, many conservatives are tired of simply voting against the liberal agenda. the gop needs to put forth candidates running for something instead of against the other party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-144603</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-144603</guid>
		<description>Chris, the only votes that count in a runoff are those for the top two choices in the first election, all other votes are not counted.

Rome,

I think the majority requirement is one of the best features of Georgia elections.  It actually allows voices for third parties.  Buckley can have his say without his presense hurting the side he is more closely aligned with.  

If the requirement was reduced to say 45%, voting for a third party would be like doing so in the Presidential election.  Harmful to your own side and helpful to the party that is united with a pluralty.

Look at it this way, if you go to the extreme of eliminating a runoff altogether, and three candidates are running, 2 reasonable moderates and one Hughie Long type populist.  If the reasonable candidates split the reasonable vote 33%-33%, the dangerous candidate would only need 34% to win the election.  Even if the runoff would be 66%-34%.

Every election for every position should require a majority, except at-large multiple candidate elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, the only votes that count in a runoff are those for the top two choices in the first election, all other votes are not counted.</p>
<p>Rome,</p>
<p>I think the majority requirement is one of the best features of Georgia elections.  It actually allows voices for third parties.  Buckley can have his say without his presense hurting the side he is more closely aligned with.  </p>
<p>If the requirement was reduced to say 45%, voting for a third party would be like doing so in the Presidential election.  Harmful to your own side and helpful to the party that is united with a pluralty.</p>
<p>Look at it this way, if you go to the extreme of eliminating a runoff altogether, and three candidates are running, 2 reasonable moderates and one Hughie Long type populist.  If the reasonable candidates split the reasonable vote 33%-33%, the dangerous candidate would only need 34% to win the election.  Even if the runoff would be 66%-34%.</p>
<p>Every election for every position should require a majority, except at-large multiple candidate elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-144585</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-144585</guid>
		<description>Are write-ins allowed in a run-off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are write-ins allowed in a run-off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/11/06/yes-saxby-it-is-true/comment-page-2/#comment-144583</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/?p=9812#comment-144583</guid>
		<description>What DOES that mean, 3-Jack?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What DOES that mean, 3-Jack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

