I don’t give a flying f*** what you say you do…we are right here, right now…demonstrate you have balls, or, stick the 4×8 up your rearend, along with your “principles” that turning this country over to 100% control by far left-wing Socialists is GOOD for you.
But Bill, I know you started doing research on communism and I hope you also learned a little about socialism along the way so…
If you are concerned with a “left-wing Socialist[sic]” taking over, why are you so adamant in supporting someone who voted to nationalize the banking system and wants to control what happens in people’s bedrooms?
Spare me the “Jim Martin will be worse” lines.
Saxby has shown to be a failure at supporting fiscal conservatism, and you know that.
Ah, Rugby…this is where you are wrong in your statement: “If you are concerned with a “left-wing Socialist[sic]” taking over, why are you so adamant in supporting someone who voted to nationalize the banking system”
He didn’t vote to “nationalize” the banking system. All the US Government is doing is investing in their stock or debt (I really don’t know which).
The US Treasury will hold no voting stock or sit on any board.
THAT is the difference between “nationalizing” a company and not nationalizing one.
Sooooo…in your forest, there is one rotten tree and you want to clear the land by torching the entire forest just so that one rotten tree can be incinerated?
Fire has a nasty habit of not restricting itself to the one area you need it to burn.
Are you saying that even though Chambliss is the one rotten tree in the Republican forest, he should not be removed for fear of damaging good Republicans?
{ 121 comments }
← Previous Comments
Indy,
I don’t give a flying f*** what you say you do…we are right here, right now…demonstrate you have balls, or, stick the 4×8 up your rearend, along with your “principles” that turning this country over to 100% control by far left-wing Socialists is GOOD for you.
But Bill, I know you started doing research on communism and I hope you also learned a little about socialism along the way so…
If you are concerned with a “left-wing Socialist[sic]” taking over, why are you so adamant in supporting someone who voted to nationalize the banking system and wants to control what happens in people’s bedrooms?
Spare me the “Jim Martin will be worse” lines.
Saxby has shown to be a failure at supporting fiscal conservatism, and you know that.
Ah, Rugby…this is where you are wrong in your statement: “If you are concerned with a “left-wing Socialist[sic]” taking over, why are you so adamant in supporting someone who voted to nationalize the banking system”
He didn’t vote to “nationalize” the banking system. All the US Government is doing is investing in their stock or debt (I really don’t know which).
The US Treasury will hold no voting stock or sit on any board.
THAT is the difference between “nationalizing” a company and not nationalizing one.
Bill
Can you give us the definition of “is” next?
John:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is
The word “is” constitutes the third-person singular form of “to be”, copula of the English language.
Chris
LOL
I have my Chris sign on my lawn!
looks like bill’s one vote will be cancelled out multiple times.
saxby tarnishes the gop brand. if the gop has any chance of getting its mojo back, rinos like saxby need to be expelled asap.
it is past time to admit the gop should be in rebuilding mode. the party f’d up by not doing so earlier.
a vote for saxby is a vote for putting one more nail in the gop coffin.
John, take a picture so Erick can add it to the banner!
* (only the born ones)
Fairness Doctrine extinguishes free speech. You for that?
So says the McCain[-Feingold] supporter.
+1
I think you shoult do a Ferris Wheel motif with a little child being lifted into the air with arms raised in a V.
LONG LIVE THE RAT BASTARD!
Add a man standing below. Then your slogan can be “It takes a Rat Bastard to save a child.”
“Some Rat Bastards will let the Children Down. This Rat Bastard will push them off.”
Three-Jack,
Sooooo…in your forest, there is one rotten tree and you want to clear the land by torching the entire forest just so that one rotten tree can be incinerated?
Fire has a nasty habit of not restricting itself to the one area you need it to burn.
Bill,
Are you saying that even though Chambliss is the one rotten tree in the Republican forest, he should not be removed for fear of damaging good Republicans?
Chambliss is a fungus among us.
Joe,
Rotten trees provide good food to the insects of the forest and can be used to re-invigorate the other trees.
So we should just let Chambliss be eaten by the bugs for the good of the forest. Okay, now I see.
← Previous Comments
Comments on this entry are closed.