<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I guess he better start campaigning.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:00:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rugby fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-143183</link>
		<dc:creator>rugby fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/#comment-143183</guid>
		<description>Uh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-143182</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/#comment-143182</guid>
		<description>The proof is in the law and precedence.

Go ask Mike Crotts why he was refused a ballot slot 2 years ago when he tried to challenge John Douglas in the primary.

He was removed under the very same conditions that Jim Powell was challenged on.

SO, if the law worked back then, why wouldn&#039;t it work today?  Because the SC didn&#039;t feel like thinking about the problems of their past decisions.

Thus, my &quot;proof.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proof is in the law and precedence.</p>
<p>Go ask Mike Crotts why he was refused a ballot slot 2 years ago when he tried to challenge John Douglas in the primary.</p>
<p>He was removed under the very same conditions that Jim Powell was challenged on.</p>
<p>SO, if the law worked back then, why wouldn&#8217;t it work today?  Because the SC didn&#8217;t feel like thinking about the problems of their past decisions.</p>
<p>Thus, my &#8220;proof.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rugby fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-143177</link>
		<dc:creator>rugby fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/#comment-143177</guid>
		<description>&quot;All because the other judges didn’t feel like actually THINKING.&quot;

Proof please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All because the other judges didn’t feel like actually THINKING.&#8221;</p>
<p>Proof please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-143172</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/#comment-143172</guid>
		<description>There have been other decisions in the past that this new precedent nullifies now.

Good thing this SC does NOT like to follow anything like the &quot;Rule of Law&quot; in their decision-making process.

Before everyone goes claiming this was a &quot;GOP&quot; initiative, keep in mind the DEMOCRAT-CONTROLLED Attorney-General&#039;s office agreed with the SoS&#039;s poisition on interpreting the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been other decisions in the past that this new precedent nullifies now.</p>
<p>Good thing this SC does NOT like to follow anything like the &#8220;Rule of Law&#8221; in their decision-making process.</p>
<p>Before everyone goes claiming this was a &#8220;GOP&#8221; initiative, keep in mind the DEMOCRAT-CONTROLLED Attorney-General&#8217;s office agreed with the SoS&#8217;s poisition on interpreting the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-143171</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/#comment-143171</guid>
		<description>All because the other judges didn&#039;t feel like actually THINKING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All because the other judges didn&#8217;t feel like actually THINKING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griftdrift</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-143168</link>
		<dc:creator>griftdrift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/#comment-143168</guid>
		<description>Long enough to get a unanimous ruling without even so much of a whisper of dissent, Bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long enough to get a unanimous ruling without even so much of a whisper of dissent, Bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tinsandwich</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-143163</link>
		<dc:creator>tinsandwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/#comment-143163</guid>
		<description>Is seems as if the SC is sending a message. Even if you don&#039;t like the way the interpet the law, don&#039;t try to interpet it yourself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is seems as if the SC is sending a message. Even if you don&#8217;t like the way the interpet the law, don&#8217;t try to interpet it yourself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/comment-page-1/#comment-143161</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/30/i-guess-he-better-start-campaigning/#comment-143161</guid>
		<description>&quot;and administrative rulings will be adopted only when they conform to the meaning which the court deems should properly be given&quot;

HAHAHA!  How long did Benham work on that masterpiece of double-talking bullsh*t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;and administrative rulings will be adopted only when they conform to the meaning which the court deems should properly be given&#8221;</p>
<p>HAHAHA!  How long did Benham work on that masterpiece of double-talking bullsh*t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
