Comments on: YES!

By: Bill Simon

Bill Simon — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:07:10 +0000

ACKKK! Chris Farris IS turning into ME!

By: IndyInjun

IndyInjun — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:38:08 +0000

Atlanta -

Yeah. Saxby’s race is even more important to the DC con men, thieves, liars, and Wall Street fraudsters now that their main man, Stevens, is gone.

Anyone who votes for Saxby Chambliss has either no sense or no principles, like the Alaska GOP that defeated opposition for Stevens.

Putting the GOP first is just rotten.

I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that the GOP is just plain corrupt.

If Saxby ends up in a run-off, he ends up because he champions crooks who have stolen from every working American.

By: Progressive Dem

Progressive Dem — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:06:16 +0000

The era of George Bush and Sarah Palin has passed. The GOP and conservatism will not assend again with an empty suit.

By: Chris

Chris — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:36:02 +0000

I’m not sure how you get there Senator.

More than likely, Sen. Stevens will not win his re-election. If the kind of miracle that needs occur to for him to win, then Governor Palin will be President of the Senate.

Now, she has taken down one Murkoswki, so she could go after the next one in 2 or 4 years. But that wouldn’t make her the next Senator. That person will most likely be a Democrat

By: atlantaman

atlantaman — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:07:01 +0000

Good call Senator Douglas.

This makes Saxby’s race even more important now.

By: John Douglas

John Douglas — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:51:41 +0000

If the election plays out as it may, look for Sarah Palin to be the next US Senator from Alaska.

By: Ronald Daniels

Ronald Daniels — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:14:41 +0000

Good riddance. Should have been purged in 2006.

By: The Right Side of Life » Blog Archive » We The People

The Right Side of Life » Blog Archive » We The People — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:50:37 +0000

[...] Stevens guilty on all counts, career in peril (also via hotair.com and peachpundit.com): “We the People” must always be vigilant to demand the best out of those who govern [...]

By: shep1975

shep1975 — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:50:07 +0000

Looking at the primary results, there were 6 candidates opposing Stevens in the GOP primary. I guess only one would have been a serious candidate in that he got more votes than the other losers combined, but Stevens still got 63.5% while under indictment.

http://www.elections.alaska.gov/08prim/data/results.html

By: shep1975

shep1975 — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:45:34 +0000

Stevens did have primary opposition. Guy was a former State Senator.

By: sickfreak

sickfreak — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:41:51 +0000

Redstate is down. Stevens must have clogged the series of tubes as he was leaving the courthouse.

By: Icarus

Icarus — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:37:07 +0000

Redstate does the right thing.

By: Chris

Chris — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:33:41 +0000

Shame on the Republicans of Georgia for not even attempting to run someone against Saxby.

By: Chris

Chris — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:32:57 +0000

Did Stevens have primary opposition or are you thinking about Young (another SOB I’d like to see die in prison) who was challenged by Palin’s Lt. Governor?

By: Buzz Brockway

Buzz Brockway — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:28:55 +0000

Shep,

Then shame on the voters in Alaska.

By: Jane

Jane — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:19:44 +0000

I hope he dies in Prison. Behavior that brings disrepute to the party is punishable by Dunga or worse Death by Dunga.

By: shep1975

shep1975 — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:01:06 +0000

Buzz, Stevens did have primary opposition.

By: shep1975

shep1975 — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:00:29 +0000

But what does this have to do with the Georgia Gang?

By: Buzz Brockway

Buzz Brockway — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:56:30 +0000

If Stevens had cared out his State and it’s citizens he would have stepped aside and let someone else fill the position. Of course if he had cared about Alaska’s citizens he wouldn’t have been corrupt.

By: Icarus

Icarus — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:39:05 +0000

He should feel right at home there, after spending so much time on the pound-us-in-the-xxx Appropriations Committee.