<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Politics of the Bailout.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:22:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139834</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139834</guid>
		<description>re:
&quot;I fully recognize the importance to act and act quickly.&quot;

(I fully recognize jackass politicians at work robbing us blind.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re:<br />
&#8220;I fully recognize the importance to act and act quickly.&#8221;</p>
<p>(I fully recognize jackass politicians at work robbing us blind.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139689</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 03:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139689</guid>
		<description>Game,

They don&#039;t need the Constitution.  They wipe their rear-ends with $100,000 checks from Wall street lobbyists.

AND...Hank Paulson dispenses the toilet paper personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Game,</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t need the Constitution.  They wipe their rear-ends with $100,000 checks from Wall street lobbyists.</p>
<p>AND&#8230;Hank Paulson dispenses the toilet paper personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139647</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 01:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139647</guid>
		<description>The Constitution isn&#039;t even a Newspaper up in DC.  So what&#039;s their excuse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Constitution isn&#8217;t even a Newspaper up in DC.  So what&#8217;s their excuse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowersville</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139613</link>
		<dc:creator>bowersville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139613</guid>
		<description>This bill is loaded up with BS.  That&#039;s what Paul Broun said about the house version.  He said it was a cow patty dressed up with a marshmallow in the middle.

Dang, I can&#039;t wait to see how he will describe the Senate version.  Maybe he&#039;ll get all bipartisan on us with that franked mail issue and all.

Some of you Progressive Demowits need to contribute to Bobby Saxon so he can afford to get his message out. 

BTW, how much did that Obama appreciation BBQ Saturday at the BigO HQ in Hartwell bring in for you Bobby?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bill is loaded up with BS.  That&#8217;s what Paul Broun said about the house version.  He said it was a cow patty dressed up with a marshmallow in the middle.</p>
<p>Dang, I can&#8217;t wait to see how he will describe the Senate version.  Maybe he&#8217;ll get all bipartisan on us with that franked mail issue and all.</p>
<p>Some of you Progressive Demowits need to contribute to Bobby Saxon so he can afford to get his message out. </p>
<p>BTW, how much did that Obama appreciation BBQ Saturday at the BigO HQ in Hartwell bring in for you Bobby?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Ga Indy</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139571</link>
		<dc:creator>North Ga Indy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139571</guid>
		<description>Go Goddard!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Goddard!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bucky Plyler</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139543</link>
		<dc:creator>Bucky Plyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139543</guid>
		<description>Taft Republican has hit the nail on the head. It seems that no one is interested in it anymore. If more candidates seeking office would pledge &amp; then uphold the Constitution in their platforms-solutions...more people would vote for them regardless of the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taft Republican has hit the nail on the head. It seems that no one is interested in it anymore. If more candidates seeking office would pledge &amp; then uphold the Constitution in their platforms-solutions&#8230;more people would vote for them regardless of the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel N. Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139536</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel N. Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139536</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;main street assistance act.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

I like that

Icurus,  If you ever decide to fly again, please let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><b>main street assistance act.</b></i></p>
<p>I like that</p>
<p>Icurus,  If you ever decide to fly again, please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RuralDem</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139533</link>
		<dc:creator>RuralDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139533</guid>
		<description>&quot;Take your partisan blinders off for a second. &quot;

Coming from you, that is hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Take your partisan blinders off for a second. &#8221;</p>
<p>Coming from you, that is hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tb</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139528</link>
		<dc:creator>tb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139528</guid>
		<description>This dressed up bill is still loaded with BS. And the House is introducing a bill that does not include welfare to CEOs.  I hope people flood the senate with phone calls yet again.  

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/vid...aptur.defazio.intv.cnn 


Please consider contacting the capitol switchboard and flood them with calls. The Senate is voting on their wonderful $700 billion plan tonight and then going on hiatus.... Contact Your Senator Today and tell them NO TO CEO WELFARE. 
Senator Isakson: 202 224 3643 
&gt; Senator Chambliss 202 224 3521 


Now, perhaps there will be one or 2 senators that will fillibuster and then the house bill will go through the house and we can get something better that will cost us 0 dollars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This dressed up bill is still loaded with BS. And the House is introducing a bill that does not include welfare to CEOs.  I hope people flood the senate with phone calls yet again.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/vid...aptur.defazio.intv.cnn" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/video/#/vid&#8230;aptur.defazio.intv.cnn</a> </p>
<p>Please consider contacting the capitol switchboard and flood them with calls. The Senate is voting on their wonderful $700 billion plan tonight and then going on hiatus&#8230;. Contact Your Senator Today and tell them NO TO CEO WELFARE.<br />
Senator Isakson: 202 224 3643<br />
&gt; Senator Chambliss 202 224 3521 </p>
<p>Now, perhaps there will be one or 2 senators that will fillibuster and then the house bill will go through the house and we can get something better that will cost us 0 dollars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Brockway</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139526</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Brockway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139526</guid>
		<description>RuralDem,

Take your partisan blinders off for a second. 
 
Goddard stated exactly why he wouldn&#039;t vote for the bill.  Martin listed a set of thing he wanted in the bill, almost all are in the bill, but he then gives a vague  statement that he&#039;s against it.  That&#039;s why I think Martin&#039;s arm could easily be twisted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RuralDem,</p>
<p>Take your partisan blinders off for a second. </p>
<p>Goddard stated exactly why he wouldn&#8217;t vote for the bill.  Martin listed a set of thing he wanted in the bill, almost all are in the bill, but he then gives a vague  statement that he&#8217;s against it.  That&#8217;s why I think Martin&#8217;s arm could easily be twisted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rural independent</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139522</link>
		<dc:creator>rural independent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139522</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s easy for Goddard to be on the other side of the fence in opposing this bill because he wnats to get elected, but I admire Congressman Marshall for voting for this plan not knowing how it will play out during the election. I wish there were more comgressmen like Marshall who votes with his heart &amp; not with his head. Something needs to get done up in washington because things are bleak right now. Plus the bill isn&#039;t going to cure all of the ills of the economy, with jobs laying people off, hours being cut back, people not paying for thier bills or not being able to ford a loan ( student, auto, etc ). I am a independent conservative who always liked Jim Marshall &amp; I plan on voting for him again in November. If it cost him his seat because he only wants to help folks who are struggling, then so be it I will vote for him in 2010 when he runs against Johnny Isakson (put your money on it, he&#039;s going to run for the U.S. Senate regardless if he wins re-election or not).  It&#039;s time to put partisanship aside &amp; get this thing done before it&#039;s too late. Doing something is better than doing nothing.  Jim, along with Sanford Bishop are the only congressmen here in Georgia who has the guts to vote for the bill when they were bombarded with calls saying they shouldn&#039;t. I tip my hat to Marshall &amp; Bishop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easy for Goddard to be on the other side of the fence in opposing this bill because he wnats to get elected, but I admire Congressman Marshall for voting for this plan not knowing how it will play out during the election. I wish there were more comgressmen like Marshall who votes with his heart &amp; not with his head. Something needs to get done up in washington because things are bleak right now. Plus the bill isn&#8217;t going to cure all of the ills of the economy, with jobs laying people off, hours being cut back, people not paying for thier bills or not being able to ford a loan ( student, auto, etc ). I am a independent conservative who always liked Jim Marshall &amp; I plan on voting for him again in November. If it cost him his seat because he only wants to help folks who are struggling, then so be it I will vote for him in 2010 when he runs against Johnny Isakson (put your money on it, he&#8217;s going to run for the U.S. Senate regardless if he wins re-election or not).  It&#8217;s time to put partisanship aside &amp; get this thing done before it&#8217;s too late. Doing something is better than doing nothing.  Jim, along with Sanford Bishop are the only congressmen here in Georgia who has the guts to vote for the bill when they were bombarded with calls saying they shouldn&#8217;t. I tip my hat to Marshall &amp; Bishop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RuralDem</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139518</link>
		<dc:creator>RuralDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139518</guid>
		<description>Jim Marshall, not John.

Also wouldn&#039;t &quot;but of course it’s easier to make such statements when you’re not in office and thus subject to whatever arm twisting is going on&quot; apply to Goddard as well or is that simply limited to Democrats running against incumbent Republicans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Marshall, not John.</p>
<p>Also wouldn&#8217;t &#8220;but of course it’s easier to make such statements when you’re not in office and thus subject to whatever arm twisting is going on&#8221; apply to Goddard as well or is that simply limited to Democrats running against incumbent Republicans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icarus</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139517</link>
		<dc:creator>Icarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139517</guid>
		<description>Goddard should promote the Icarus main street assistance act.  He would win in a landslide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goddard should promote the Icarus main street assistance act.  He would win in a landslide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taft Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-139515</link>
		<dc:creator>Taft Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/10/01/the-politics-of-the-bailout/#comment-139515</guid>
		<description>Hey, I&#039;ve got an idea! Let&#039;s look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this here thingie&lt;/a&gt;, and try to find anywhere that is says Congress can do ANY of this crap!

Am I the ONLY one saying this???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;ve got an idea! Let&#8217;s look at <a href="http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html" rel="nofollow">this here thingie</a>, and try to find anywhere that is says Congress can do ANY of this crap!</p>
<p>Am I the ONLY one saying this???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

