<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Voter ID Lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/05/27/another-voter-id-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/05/27/another-voter-id-lawsuit/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldwater Conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/05/27/another-voter-id-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-125927</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldwater Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/05/27/another-voter-id-lawsuit/#comment-125927</guid>
		<description>Digested? The justice Kennedy even said that if the last lawsuit were able to identify more than a hand ful of disenfranchised voters then the ruling may have been different.  If the DPG can produce a list of a couple of thousand people...than the lawsuit can swing the other way.  It also helps the DPG&#039;s case that GA is covered by VRA Section 5. 
It is not a difficult chore to come up with that list, and it is long.  The issue that has not come up too much is that while a couple hundred thousand GA registered voters (that have never been issued, or could have been issued, the proper id) really do not vote anyways.  Which does not really matter...this is a matter of principle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digested? The justice Kennedy even said that if the last lawsuit were able to identify more than a hand ful of disenfranchised voters then the ruling may have been different.  If the DPG can produce a list of a couple of thousand people&#8230;than the lawsuit can swing the other way.  It also helps the DPG&#8217;s case that GA is covered by VRA Section 5.<br />
It is not a difficult chore to come up with that list, and it is long.  The issue that has not come up too much is that while a couple hundred thousand GA registered voters (that have never been issued, or could have been issued, the proper id) really do not vote anyways.  Which does not really matter&#8230;this is a matter of principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

