Comments on: Incompetent Clayton County District Attorney: “Debates don’t mean anything.”

By: Romegaguy

Romegaguy — Wed, 21 May 2008 21:50:03 +0000

Usually whenever I see the phrase “incompetent” and “DA” in the same sentence I think of Paul Howard

By: Rogue109

Rogue109 — Wed, 21 May 2008 17:20:19 +0000

Maybe she has an INCOMPETENT STAFF. Seems the bulk of the beef is administrative.

Rick: Above are two sentences that you wrote back-to-back. Please read them again and note that you have, even under your own criteria, pointed out how inept she is.

If all she has to do is “administrative” work, then why can’t she hire a competent staff?

By: Bill Simon

Bill Simon — Wed, 21 May 2008 13:13:34 +0000

Rick,

I am convinced that you would just as soon have no laws that have to be enforced. Fine with me. Just hope you don’t mind any gun laws not being enforced.

By: The Comma Guy

The Comma Guy — Wed, 21 May 2008 13:05:00 +0000

No, the real reason she doesn’t want to do the debate is that she won’t be able to read the statements prepared by her husband, who is really running the DA’s office. Too bad he can’t be the DA and has to use her as his puppet.

Think about all the problems in Clayton County and when they all started – when Lee Scott and his cronies got elected into office.

By: Rick Day

Rick Day — Tue, 20 May 2008 13:39:43 +0000

Look, a sistahs gotta do what a sistahs gotta do. Folk complain about ‘activist’ judges. Well, we have an ‘activist’ DA.
Maybe she has an INCOMPETENT STAFF. Seems the bulk of the beef is administrative.

And she is right, debate is polite structured MEANINGLESS arguing. It does not change anything. It allows two people to show how little they really know about the other sides POV, and for dominant personalities to..dominate.

Let see…a judge (who, arguably, is politically motivated to run for..*gasp* DA!) is looking to ‘debate’ an elected DA about what a horrible job said DA is doing. Hm.

And you are goofin’ on said DA for declining?

Bi*ch, please!

By: rptrcub

rptrcub — Tue, 20 May 2008 13:36:22 +0000

This woman was responsible for the botching up of an air-tight carjacking case in Clayton County, of which a good friend of mine was a victim a few years back. Essentially, her incompetent ADA allowed the defense to portray my friend (who is white) as a racist who couldn’t tell black people apart, and allowed the jury to acquit the already several-times-convicted felon. I hope she and her entire office go down in flames. Grrrrrr.