“Frigtard” is a word we use around here with specific intent, and it does not apply to this debate.

For past research:

http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/03/28/attention-wayne-lapierre-your-nra-folks-in-georgia-are-frigtards-redstate/

http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/04/03/more-on-the-resurrection-of-sb-43/

and one of my personal favorites:

http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/04/13/general-assembly-about-to-pass-law-preventing-you-from-suing-restaurant-when-cook-masturbates-in-your-food/

frigtard, as I have heard, should be a new nickname for you.

Creator does not refer to that imagined being in the sky known as god. I have said it a million times, as had Jefferson and Franklin and…well most of the federalist in their personal diaries and comments about this country. The creator is human reason…our ability to rationalize and use logic. Not god.

And no…the monuments are not the garbage that I refer to. Some of them are rather brilliant works of art. The garbage I am refering to is the religious rhetoric used to garner political support from people who do not know any better.

Joe Schmoe from Franklin county usually has a tough time balancing the check book. He knows absolutely nothing about tax policy or our nations fiscal and monetary policies. In other words, Joe Schmoe does not know what government policies are good for his wallet and his families bank accounts. What is attractive though: a candidate that spouts out garbage about guns and god.

Has our creator abandoned us?

Has human reason gone out the window because of partisan politics and the race to the bottom?

Broun is referencing the same God that our Founders did, whom they called our “Creator.” Religion has nothing to do with this. The ignorant equating of God with religion is only a ploy by those who wish to remove any mention of Him from the public arena.

Pushing one’s morals is one thing, but protecting life is another. And yes, I believe that a group of human cells which is splitting and improving toward the ability to live independently outside the womb constitutes life, which has the right to be protected.

I obviously mean one of those made up versions of born-again christianity…regardless of the religion, however, there is no room for that garbage on capitol hill.

There are already standards of care in place to deal with competing life issues. In the event the health of the mother is in danger because of the presence of the life within her, doctors would then have to exercise these standards of care in determining treatment options, recognizing both the mother’s and the child’s rights to life.

The law as it stands today elevates the mother’s rights far above the child’s rights so that the child can be killed if it simply upsets the mother that she is carrying the child.

The mother’s “health” as defined in Doe v. Bolton can mean anything she wants it to mean. As a result, the unborn child has no rights at all under our current law.

Will he (Barry) come out for the legislation?

RWR

If your parents were a minority, they wouldn’t have been:

Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eygv8qEkiFE
Part II: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwif0VMW3c4

Oh, but no worries — PP receives millions upon millions of our tax dollars.

Rick, this statement demonstrates pure ignorance.

“He, again, is distracting people with religion.”

Which religion is that, GC?

The 10th District has some definite needs, Dr. Broun hasn’t done a darn thing to care for them. He’s more concerned with with snooping out the al-Qaeda cells he alleges are based right here in Georgia. All he cares about is fighting his holy war on abortion, porn, and gosh-darned illegals.

Martinluther, a human being is far more valuable than that of a bacteria. What makes the “personhood” of a blastula more important of the life, health, and well being of the mother? This legislation implies that the zygote is far more important than health concerns.