<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A theory: Barack v. Hillary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/04/29/a-theory-barack-v-hillary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/04/29/a-theory-barack-v-hillary/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:08:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/04/29/a-theory-barack-v-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-122330</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/04/29/a-theory-barack-v-hillary/#comment-122330</guid>
		<description>Tea,

Although I opposed him in the primaries, I always thought he was the candidate with the highest possibility of success in November.

I think the Democrats would probably be unstoppable with someone like Richardson or Lieberman, but fortunately they seem to base their selection solely on who will disturb the Republicans the most.  They disturb a whole lot of independents along the way too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tea,</p>
<p>Although I opposed him in the primaries, I always thought he was the candidate with the highest possibility of success in November.</p>
<p>I think the Democrats would probably be unstoppable with someone like Richardson or Lieberman, but fortunately they seem to base their selection solely on who will disturb the Republicans the most.  They disturb a whole lot of independents along the way too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/04/29/a-theory-barack-v-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-122327</link>
		<dc:creator>Tea Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/04/29/a-theory-barack-v-hillary/#comment-122327</guid>
		<description>My prediction is that the Dems will pick Hils for POTUS.  The reason is based on that nebulous vector:  Electability.   

The Dem powers will look at the numbers and their decison will be based on the &#039;unspeakable component&#039; in the vector

I think that will happen, the reasons will be specious, but Rev. Wrong is not helping.    

Barack has such an amazingly calm, reasonable and resonant tone in his delivery.  He has the persona of a new way of doing business, of hope.
As well, he lacks any substantive experience.

Hils has all the wrong experience, she is two steps backward for this Country.

John McCain will have one heck of a job against either candidate, but we have not seen what the GOP machine is going to churn out yet either.  I think it will make Willie Horton and Swiftboat look like baby formula ads...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My prediction is that the Dems will pick Hils for POTUS.  The reason is based on that nebulous vector:  Electability.   </p>
<p>The Dem powers will look at the numbers and their decison will be based on the &#8216;unspeakable component&#8217; in the vector</p>
<p>I think that will happen, the reasons will be specious, but Rev. Wrong is not helping.    </p>
<p>Barack has such an amazingly calm, reasonable and resonant tone in his delivery.  He has the persona of a new way of doing business, of hope.<br />
As well, he lacks any substantive experience.</p>
<p>Hils has all the wrong experience, she is two steps backward for this Country.</p>
<p>John McCain will have one heck of a job against either candidate, but we have not seen what the GOP machine is going to churn out yet either.  I think it will make Willie Horton and Swiftboat look like baby formula ads&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/04/29/a-theory-barack-v-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-122321</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/04/29/a-theory-barack-v-hillary/#comment-122321</guid>
		<description>I think a Hillary candidacy is about 40%, but there is nearly a 100% chance that if she is not the nominee, she will sabotage Obama in November.  2012, she is still viable and she can &quot;I told you so&quot; her way to the nomination.  In 2016, she would turn 69, which is pushing the age envelope a little, and risks some wildcard coming in, like an Obama VP or someone like Sen. Bob Casey.

With WV, KY and PR on the horizon, and the likelyhood of the &quot;I&#039;m ahead in the pop vote with MI and FL&quot; argument turning into a &quot;I am ahead in the pop vote with just Florida&quot;, don&#039;t be surprised if the convention ends with a deadlock and perhaps a third candidate.

At that point the Dems might think  &quot;It would be a disaster to chose one over the other, so lets go a third way&quot;. 

Anyway, Republicans would be better served to focus on their own house and try to beat whomever the Democrats select instead of hoping for the supposed weaker candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a Hillary candidacy is about 40%, but there is nearly a 100% chance that if she is not the nominee, she will sabotage Obama in November.  2012, she is still viable and she can &#8220;I told you so&#8221; her way to the nomination.  In 2016, she would turn 69, which is pushing the age envelope a little, and risks some wildcard coming in, like an Obama VP or someone like Sen. Bob Casey.</p>
<p>With WV, KY and PR on the horizon, and the likelyhood of the &#8220;I&#8217;m ahead in the pop vote with MI and FL&#8221; argument turning into a &#8220;I am ahead in the pop vote with just Florida&#8221;, don&#8217;t be surprised if the convention ends with a deadlock and perhaps a third candidate.</p>
<p>At that point the Dems might think  &#8220;It would be a disaster to chose one over the other, so lets go a third way&#8221;. </p>
<p>Anyway, Republicans would be better served to focus on their own house and try to beat whomever the Democrats select instead of hoping for the supposed weaker candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/04/29/a-theory-barack-v-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-122319</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/04/29/a-theory-barack-v-hillary/#comment-122319</guid>
		<description>Yes Chris.  I still think he will be, objectively, but my gut says Hillary is going to be the nominee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Chris.  I still think he will be, objectively, but my gut says Hillary is going to be the nominee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Farris</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/04/29/a-theory-barack-v-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-122300</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2008/04/29/a-theory-barack-v-hillary/#comment-122300</guid>
		<description>didn&#039;t you say obama will be the nominee in the Charlie bishop thread?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>didn&#8217;t you say obama will be the nominee in the Charlie bishop thread?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
