How quaint that the C-Party would resurrect (no pun intended) his failed amendment and place it squarely at the front of their “constitution.”

They’re just quoting Patrick Henry, Bill. I know he’s your favorite of the Founders. It doesn’t appear that they give him the credit for those words.

The main component of the so-called “Constitution Party” is, actually, AGAINST the US Constitution. That you are a proud member of said party demonstrates that you are not really that qualified to argue about what is and what is not “constitutional” in this country.

The following Preamble to your party’s constitution demonstrates that by the mere wording: he Constitution Party gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe and of these United States. We hereby appeal to Him for mercy, aid, comfort, guidance and the protection of His Providence as we work to restore and preserve these United States.

This great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been and are afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.

This country was NOT “founded” on the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

You and other members of the C-Party like to think that it is “okay” to just insert your own interpretations about the intent of the original writers and voters of the US Constitution, but, (Facebook friend of mine or not), you’re just plain full of manure, Bill G.

You got a problem with saying the word “gay?” AND…I’m actually pretty sure that not all gay Republicans are members of the “Log Cabin Republicans.”

Furthermore, to presume or ASS-ume that because a person is gay, they might possibly be “anti-woman” is to more demonstrate that YOU are pretty ignorant, and you might be happier joining the “GOP Dykes on Bikes Club” than remaining in the regular Republican Party.

Next conservative boogeyman please.

Just about every major bill that he’s stuck his name on lately (e.g., McCain-Feingold) has been unconstitutional. He’ll just appoint people that will uphold his stuff — and those people sure won’t be conservative.

The “McCain legacy” is an unknown quantity, not a given.

Methinks some people have too much faith in the good Senator…

Congressman Deal’s speech was fantastic. He said so much more than just his reasons for supporting McCain. He made some very good points on rights and how they are derived. His comments on McCain were merely a comparison of McCain’s love for and service to his country and the unpatriotic and anti-American rhetoric, actions, and associations of the democratic candidates.

Though there ma not have been a massive display of disapproval with Mr. Fleming’s comments, there was audible discontent.

See my post on the convention:
http://theotherathens.blogspot.com/2008/04/10th-district-gop-convention-recap.html

Do you really want to just let Obama or Clinton make those appointments?

Who had you rather make those appointments?

These appointments can steer the SC solidly conservative or steer it back to the far left… These appointments will affect our country for the next decade at least…

I assume you taught at Emmanuel College in Franklin Springs?

If so do you still teach there?

But we don’t want OBAMA or HILLARY, do we??? We HAVE TO get out and round up support for McCain! WE HAVE TO!!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah, they were all White men if thats what you mean. We did elect the Chair of the Georgia Republican Jewish Coalition as an alternate, though

Rick Goddard seems to be the attraction wherever he goes.