http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osJQvbiFTmo

With GEORGIA being a HUCKABEE WIN, the delegates will have to sign a pledge to vote for the DISTRICT WIINNER or STATE WINNER, (depending on where they were elected to the National Convention) for the first 2 ballots. The way things are going, it’s not going to take even 2ballots. So whoever is elected will be voting for HUCKABEE, if their District was a win for him.

Who needs that heartache?

we all know I wouldn’t win, but the campaign would be a hell of a lot of fun.

If GOPeach was to endorse your run for President, you would surely lose too

You now have the same number of delegates as Mitt Romney. But you’re still losing to Ron Paul.

Not true. We are trying to get him sworn in Peach.

You are only good for half of the battle. Where are you when Congressman-Elect Broun needs you the most?

You mean the dude that can’t get sworn in?

“you have placed me way too high on the national influence podium. ”

Not likely,

“Oh and… Mike Huckabee is still running for president and he is still getting my support.”

Best of luck with that. He and I have the exact same chance of getting elected President this year.

How about we get the government totally out of the business of marriage? Marriage is a religious matter, something between the people getting married and their preacher. The government has no authority regulating the religious matters of two consenting adults.

If you are blaming Ron Paul’s lack of votes on me… you have placed me way too high on the national influence podium.

Oh and… Mike Huckabee is still running for president and he is still getting my support.

I agree with you about the “rights” of gays in Civil Unions. This would give them the same “tax benefits” and even insurance benefits as anyone else. That is only fair.

But with FAIR TAX – there would be no concern about this.

It has already been done.

It may be nothing, but if McCain’s own advisors won’t back him against Obama, how many moderate Republicans and independents won’t, either?

Link to interview: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18958535

http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0208/Huck_puts_chips_on_Texas_pushes_idea_of_brokered_convention.html

For those of you that say they will not vote for McCain, read the article below to see what we have at stake this November.

Just take time to think about this article . Do you really want to sit this election out with so much at stake? We have much work to do to keep the Whitehouse…

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25026

Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain
by Michael Reagan

Posted: 02/15/2008

In 1976 the Ford vs. Reagan campaign for the Republican presidential nomination got so heated it looked as if my father and Jerry Ford would never again talk to one another.

When it was over and Ford had won, what did Ronald Reagan do? He simply went all-out to help Ford win his re-election, as did I and as did my sister Maureen. My dad simply followed his rule of backing the Republican candidate no matter who he was.

Assuming that John McCain will be the Republican nominee, you can bet my father would be itching to get out on the campaign trail working to elect him even if he disagreed with him on a number of issues.

Unlike my father, a lot of conservatives stayed home in 1976, and we got four years of Jimmy Carter, whose main legacy was to drive the Shah of Iran from power and create the Islamic Republic of Iran with a bunch of wild-eyed mullahs running the show. He also gave us 20 percent inflation and long, long lines at the gas pumps. And don’t forget 440 days of Americans held hostage by the mullahs.

By staying home those conservatives made possible the future election of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

We are still suffering from the legacy of James Earl Carter, thanks to the conservatives who refused to follow Ronald Reagan’s example and instead sulked at home while the nation was being handed over to the worst president in American history.

We were still in the middle of the Cold War in those days, and by staying home conservatives risked losing that war by allowing an incompetent leader to become commander in chief.

Four years later Ronald Reagan took over, the hostages were immediately released, and he went on to win the Cold War. Now we have another world-wide war going on with a hidden enemy sworn to kill us all, and the policy of the Democrats running for the presidency is to throw up their hands and withdraw from the battlefield, leaving it to the enemy — and our fate in the hands of Osama bin Laden.

Is that what the let’s-stay-home-on-election-day conservatives want? Do they want the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama, as their president? Do they want the pseudo-Marist Barack Obama — who reportedly has a photo of the murderous Castroite thug Che Guevara hanging in his Houston, Texas campaign headquarters — hanging that photo in the Oval Office?

Do they want Hillary Clinton, the duplicitous former first lady, back in the White House enjoying all those furnishings she and her husband tried to swipe from the mansion?

Do they want a Democrat spending even more money that the government doesn’t have on scores of programs right out of Karl Marx’s playbook?

That’s exactly what they’ll get if they sit out the election and stay home on Election Day. That’s called biting off your nose to spite your face. Or even more to the point, political suicide.

Let me say this. There has been plenty of battling in the primaries, and I’ve been in the middle of the battle, but until now haven’t committed myself to any candidate, waiting until we had a nominee.

That’s over.

If John McCain is the nominee of the party, this Reagan will happily campaign with him. The alternative is unthinkable to anyone who loves this nation.

Speaking of changing minds and flip flopping, wasnt GOPeach originally casting her support to Ron Paul? And some of you wonder why Ron Paul lost…

How long before candidates start asking GOPeach NOT to support them?

are = on

As I have said in the past your provocative comments are interesting to read.

Yet I do have to challenge you are the concept of a conservative. Issues like civil unions should be left up to the State not the federal government. The constitution is bigger than personal believes liberal or conservative.

Also I am against gay marriage yet I fully support gay people to have the same legal rights as any American ie civil unions. The problem we have is people on the right and left want intervene to much and push their view on the world on others. This is why the Middle East is so dysfunctional.

The key to America or any functioning democracy is the ability to respect minority rights otherwise you have mob rules.