<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Reagan: Record Obviously Trumps Rhetoric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:33:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lester Maddox</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74880</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester Maddox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74880</guid>
		<description>Fred Thompson is a member of the CFR.  That is all I need to know.  No-Thank-You.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred Thompson is a member of the CFR.  That is all I need to know.  No-Thank-You.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHelf</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74878</link>
		<dc:creator>CHelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74878</guid>
		<description>Hmmm. No one can even say what Fred&#039;s platform is and why he is the best candidate? That doesn&#039;t bode well.

As for rediculous immigration stance, I suppose building a wall is the only &#039;credible&#039; response to what should be done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. No one can even say what Fred&#8217;s platform is and why he is the best candidate? That doesn&#8217;t bode well.</p>
<p>As for rediculous immigration stance, I suppose building a wall is the only &#8216;credible&#8217; response to what should be done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DutchDawg</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74857</link>
		<dc:creator>DutchDawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74857</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t think he did himself in with his ridiculous immigration stance? I need some of your blind optimism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t think he did himself in with his ridiculous immigration stance? I need some of your blind optimism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bull Moose</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74855</link>
		<dc:creator>Bull Moose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74855</guid>
		<description>McCain and Thompson are tied for second place in national polls, that is hardly &quot;done&quot;.  

McCain has the consistent conservative voting record if truly &quot;record trumps rhetoric&quot;.  As well, McCain has the best assembled campaign team.  

These are just bumps along the path.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain and Thompson are tied for second place in national polls, that is hardly &#8220;done&#8221;.  </p>
<p>McCain has the consistent conservative voting record if truly &#8220;record trumps rhetoric&#8221;.  As well, McCain has the best assembled campaign team.  </p>
<p>These are just bumps along the path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DutchDawg</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74846</link>
		<dc:creator>DutchDawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74846</guid>
		<description>BullMoose - give it up. McCain is done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BullMoose &#8211; give it up. McCain is done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74799</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74799</guid>
		<description>Another Reagan?  Hardly - I&#039;m still pissed at the young opportunist Vandy lawyer who ratted out Alexander Butterfield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Reagan?  Hardly &#8211; I&#8217;m still pissed at the young opportunist Vandy lawyer who ratted out Alexander Butterfield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHelf</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74792</link>
		<dc:creator>CHelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74792</guid>
		<description>Why is he the best candidate? Convince me what he stands for and what he will do. What are his issues? This is a serious question since I failed to bite on this initial &quot;Fred is the greatest candidate&quot; movement. I have family in TN who loves the guy and voted for him as Senator but just have not seen anything so far in running for President to convince them he&#039;s the best bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is he the best candidate? Convince me what he stands for and what he will do. What are his issues? This is a serious question since I failed to bite on this initial &#8220;Fred is the greatest candidate&#8221; movement. I have family in TN who loves the guy and voted for him as Senator but just have not seen anything so far in running for President to convince them he&#8217;s the best bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demonbeck</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74783</link>
		<dc:creator>Demonbeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74783</guid>
		<description>I thought Harold Miner was &quot;the Next Reagan&quot; until Kobe Bryant came along...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Harold Miner was &#8220;the Next Reagan&#8221; until Kobe Bryant came along&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capt.</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74778</link>
		<dc:creator>Capt.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74778</guid>
		<description>Well said Federalist. I don;t have a problem with Republican candidates that have different views on issues. What I have a problem with is those candidates with different views, lying about those views. It&#039;s like Extreme Makeover: Political Edition. This applies to several candidates, like Romney. 

Then you have John McCain and you don&#039;t really know where is at. Well, aside from the downward direction his campaign is headed in. 

Bottom line is, Fred Thompson isn&#039;t Ronald Reagan and neither are any of the others, and I bet there never will be another Reagan. But, I do believe Fred Thompson is by far the best candidate we have got. He&#039;s a straight shooter, a conservative, and a great candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Federalist. I don;t have a problem with Republican candidates that have different views on issues. What I have a problem with is those candidates with different views, lying about those views. It&#8217;s like Extreme Makeover: Political Edition. This applies to several candidates, like Romney. </p>
<p>Then you have John McCain and you don&#8217;t really know where is at. Well, aside from the downward direction his campaign is headed in. </p>
<p>Bottom line is, Fred Thompson isn&#8217;t Ronald Reagan and neither are any of the others, and I bet there never will be another Reagan. But, I do believe Fred Thompson is by far the best candidate we have got. He&#8217;s a straight shooter, a conservative, and a great candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federalist</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74774</link>
		<dc:creator>Federalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74774</guid>
		<description>Here is an idea, why don&#039;t we have candidates that know who they are...rather than pretending to be somebody else.  Reagan was his own man, and he was loved or his rationality and compassion.  I don&#039;t know about you, but Thompson will probably have my vote, and not because he is trying to be like Reagan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an idea, why don&#8217;t we have candidates that know who they are&#8230;rather than pretending to be somebody else.  Reagan was his own man, and he was loved or his rationality and compassion.  I don&#8217;t know about you, but Thompson will probably have my vote, and not because he is trying to be like Reagan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndyInjun</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74768</link>
		<dc:creator>IndyInjun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74768</guid>
		<description>Doug Deal wrote &quot;The last thing we need is to work so hard at avoiding proper descernment in the primaries that we end up with another GW Bush.&quot;

AMEN TO THAT!

ChrisHC is right. FT and the others are joined with a failed war that, by October, will be conclusively a lost proposition. How do they all explain staying on board this far out and so close to the day of reckoning?

Ron Paul looks more and more like what the USA needs than any of this crew of corporatist shills, FT incuded.

Having a macho image and a deep voice alone just doesn&#039;t cut it. Sure, it works for the masses, but YET another disastrous presidency may send us over the cliff.

Unless a GOP candidate makes a clear and forceful break with the Gawdawful Bush neocon gang, a LOT more than 50% of the American people are not going to trust him with the office.

It&#039;s WAY past time for some other than Hagel and Gingrich to speak bluntly about the disaster that was the GOP 100% control of government, otherwise we get 67% Dem control, leaving only the SCOTUS in GOP hands.

After 2006, why are so many in the GOP still clueless and in denial? Why are they begging for a wipe-out that will spill over into the &quot;red&quot; states?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug Deal wrote &#8220;The last thing we need is to work so hard at avoiding proper descernment in the primaries that we end up with another GW Bush.&#8221;</p>
<p>AMEN TO THAT!</p>
<p>ChrisHC is right. FT and the others are joined with a failed war that, by October, will be conclusively a lost proposition. How do they all explain staying on board this far out and so close to the day of reckoning?</p>
<p>Ron Paul looks more and more like what the USA needs than any of this crew of corporatist shills, FT incuded.</p>
<p>Having a macho image and a deep voice alone just doesn&#8217;t cut it. Sure, it works for the masses, but YET another disastrous presidency may send us over the cliff.</p>
<p>Unless a GOP candidate makes a clear and forceful break with the Gawdawful Bush neocon gang, a LOT more than 50% of the American people are not going to trust him with the office.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s WAY past time for some other than Hagel and Gingrich to speak bluntly about the disaster that was the GOP 100% control of government, otherwise we get 67% Dem control, leaving only the SCOTUS in GOP hands.</p>
<p>After 2006, why are so many in the GOP still clueless and in denial? Why are they begging for a wipe-out that will spill over into the &#8220;red&#8221; states?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHelf</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74761</link>
		<dc:creator>CHelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74761</guid>
		<description>I see a lot of movement jumping on board the Fred Show but there honestly has not been enough agenda and platform announced to convince many why he&#039;s the one to win the nomination. All I can tell is that people are so fed up with what is out there they&#039;ve just taken the leap of faith and banked on Fred being the messiah for the party.

I think it&#039;s still too early. Fred has not made any debates, any major speeches, any platform, etc. Just like Giuliani and his initial soaring numbers, he&#039;s the flavor of the week. Once the voters see him and learn more about him his numbers will drop back down to terrestrial levels and the race will get back to neck and neck. 

There are stories that Fred is heading to the UK to get blessings from the Iron Maiden and to build foreign policy credentials. This looks a little weak when you have to go elsewhere to build up the resume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a lot of movement jumping on board the Fred Show but there honestly has not been enough agenda and platform announced to convince many why he&#8217;s the one to win the nomination. All I can tell is that people are so fed up with what is out there they&#8217;ve just taken the leap of faith and banked on Fred being the messiah for the party.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s still too early. Fred has not made any debates, any major speeches, any platform, etc. Just like Giuliani and his initial soaring numbers, he&#8217;s the flavor of the week. Once the voters see him and learn more about him his numbers will drop back down to terrestrial levels and the race will get back to neck and neck. </p>
<p>There are stories that Fred is heading to the UK to get blessings from the Iron Maiden and to build foreign policy credentials. This looks a little weak when you have to go elsewhere to build up the resume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74745</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74745</guid>
		<description>I am a supporter of F. Thompson entering the race, and he will be my candidate of record, but I am not willing to crown him with the title of Another Ronald Reagan.  Further, if you are basing his Ronald Reagan creditials on his opposition to abortion, then you need to read more about why Ronald Reagan was such a popular figure.

Let&#039;s let him particiapte in a couple debates before we tell the other candidates to pack things in.

The last thing we need is to work so hard at avoiding proper descernment in the primaries that we end up with another GW Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a supporter of F. Thompson entering the race, and he will be my candidate of record, but I am not willing to crown him with the title of Another Ronald Reagan.  Further, if you are basing his Ronald Reagan creditials on his opposition to abortion, then you need to read more about why Ronald Reagan was such a popular figure.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s let him particiapte in a couple debates before we tell the other candidates to pack things in.</p>
<p>The last thing we need is to work so hard at avoiding proper descernment in the primaries that we end up with another GW Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creative Loafing Atlanta &#187; Fresh Loaf &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Atlanta blogs today: Weekend festivities</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74741</link>
		<dc:creator>Creative Loafing Atlanta &#187; Fresh Loaf &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Atlanta blogs today: Weekend festivities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74741</guid>
		<description>[...] -Seth Millican at Peach Pundit has an expansive definition of the word &#8220;decisively.&#8221; Thompson&#8217;s four-point lead was less than the poll&#8217;s margin of error. I guess Thompson&#8217;s sonorous voice makes everything he does seem decisive. Tags: atlanta blogs, Bonnaroo, Fred Thompson [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] -Seth Millican at Peach Pundit has an expansive definition of the word &#8220;decisively.&#8221; Thompson&#8217;s four-point lead was less than the poll&#8217;s margin of error. I guess Thompson&#8217;s sonorous voice makes everything he does seem decisive. Tags: atlanta blogs, Bonnaroo, Fred Thompson [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rugby_fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74732</link>
		<dc:creator>rugby_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74732</guid>
		<description>It really is too bad for Thompson that the voters rarely elect bald candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is too bad for Thompson that the voters rarely elect bald candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Am Jacks Post</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74727</link>
		<dc:creator>I Am Jacks Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74727</guid>
		<description>http://shotpolitics.com/sign-john-mccains-get-well-card.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shotpolitics.com/sign-john-mccains-get-well-card.htm" rel="nofollow">http://shotpolitics.com/sign-john-mccains-get-well-card.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bull Moose</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74724</link>
		<dc:creator>Bull Moose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74724</guid>
		<description>Gosh, I didn&#039;t realize that the voters of South Carolina had already voted.  Wait, they haven&#039;t.  

A poll is just a snapshot and the race for the White House is a long marathon.

Just so you can relate a little with reality.  At different times in other open races, some of the front runners who did not win their party nomination included: Howard Dean (leading in 2004), Wes Clark (last unsuccessful draft candidate), Elizabeth Dole (she topped everyone in 2000), Lamar Alexander (early favorite from 1996), Dan Quayle (another early 2000 favorite)... need I say more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, I didn&#8217;t realize that the voters of South Carolina had already voted.  Wait, they haven&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>A poll is just a snapshot and the race for the White House is a long marathon.</p>
<p>Just so you can relate a little with reality.  At different times in other open races, some of the front runners who did not win their party nomination included: Howard Dean (leading in 2004), Wes Clark (last unsuccessful draft candidate), Elizabeth Dole (she topped everyone in 2000), Lamar Alexander (early favorite from 1996), Dan Quayle (another early 2000 favorite)&#8230; need I say more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisishardcore</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74717</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisishardcore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74717</guid>
		<description>Opposition to embryonic stem cell research took out a sitting Republican senator in Missouri in 2006.  Missouri hasn&#039;t voted for a Democratic presidential candidate since Bill Clinton&#039;s second race.

The Reagan that ran for office was a conservative who espoused conservative positions that the status quo was uncomfortable with but that the general public supported.  Thompson is no Reagan.  There is no popular appetite to ban embryonic stem cell research or overturn Roe v Wade.

The issues that conservatives are choosing to define themselves on now (the aforementioned + unconditional support for the War in Iraq) aren&#039;t just out of favor with media elites (like Reagan) but also are massively unpopular with the general population as a whole (unlike Reagan).

Since Thompson is essentially an empty suit that could be a vehicle for anything he wants, it&#039;s either bizarre that he&#039;s pushing himself so far to the right (when he doesn&#039;t need to) or an indictment of how hard it is for a more mainstream candidate to emerge from a Republican primary.

That&#039;s my $.02.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opposition to embryonic stem cell research took out a sitting Republican senator in Missouri in 2006.  Missouri hasn&#8217;t voted for a Democratic presidential candidate since Bill Clinton&#8217;s second race.</p>
<p>The Reagan that ran for office was a conservative who espoused conservative positions that the status quo was uncomfortable with but that the general public supported.  Thompson is no Reagan.  There is no popular appetite to ban embryonic stem cell research or overturn Roe v Wade.</p>
<p>The issues that conservatives are choosing to define themselves on now (the aforementioned + unconditional support for the War in Iraq) aren&#8217;t just out of favor with media elites (like Reagan) but also are massively unpopular with the general population as a whole (unlike Reagan).</p>
<p>Since Thompson is essentially an empty suit that could be a vehicle for anything he wants, it&#8217;s either bizarre that he&#8217;s pushing himself so far to the right (when he doesn&#8217;t need to) or an indictment of how hard it is for a more mainstream candidate to emerge from a Republican primary.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my $.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy_a2b</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-74709</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy_a2b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/06/18/the-next-reagan-record-obviously-trumps-rhetoric/#comment-74709</guid>
		<description>Helllllloooooooo, this is why this is the only candidate true conservatives trust. “Record trumps rhetoric,” enough said. Everyone who has not already needs to sign up at www.GA4Fred.org and www.ImWithFred.com . Do it and do it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helllllloooooooo, this is why this is the only candidate true conservatives trust. “Record trumps rhetoric,” enough said. Everyone who has not already needs to sign up at <a href="http://www.GA4Fred.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.GA4Fred.org</a> and <a href="http://www.ImWithFred.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ImWithFred.com</a> . Do it and do it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
