<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Missing The Point On Genarlow Wilson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:13:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keyboard Warrior</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50952</link>
		<dc:creator>Keyboard Warrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50952</guid>
		<description>&quot;Eric and Erick have confused &#039;facts&#039; with facts.&quot; should have said, &quot;Eric and Erick have confused &#039;facts&#039; with falsehoods.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Eric and Erick have confused &#8216;facts&#8217; with facts.&#8221; should have said, &#8220;Eric and Erick have confused &#8216;facts&#8217; with falsehoods.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keyboard Warrior</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50951</link>
		<dc:creator>Keyboard Warrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50951</guid>
		<description>Erick was misled by Senator Eric Johnson on the Neil Boortz show this morning.  17 year-old Genarlow Wilson had no arrests prior to the case in which he was convicted for getting a blow job from a 15 year-old girl -- none -- nada -- zero.  In fact, Wilson was an honors student in high school.

The 15 year-old girl, who did not drink or smoke pot that night, does and has always said that this act was consensual.   In other words, she was not a &quot;victim&quot; as Johnson claims. 

Wilson did not have intercourse, abusive or otherwise, with anybody who was passed out or barely conscious.  Wilson did have consensual intercourse the same night with another 17 year-old girl.  Despite Johnson&#039;s insistence that he knows otherwise, the jury found Wilson not guilty on rape charges, and the alleged rape victim, says that Wilson did not rape her.  

Wilson, who again, had never been arrested before, didn&#039;t plead out because he didn&#039;t think that receiving a blow job should be illegal.  He also didn&#039;t want to be a registered sex offender for the rest of his life.  I wouldn&#039;t have pleaded out either.

Erick writes, &quot;The fact is, as Eric Johnson said, the jury got him based on the 15 year old, but they really convicted him based on what he did with the 17 year old.&quot;  Of course, this is not fact, but merely speculation on the part of Senator Johnson and accepted without question by Erick.  The fact is that members of the jury have actually sought to have the conviction overturned when they learned of the draconian sentence.

Eric and Erick have confused &quot;facts&quot; with facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick was misled by Senator Eric Johnson on the Neil Boortz show this morning.  17 year-old Genarlow Wilson had no arrests prior to the case in which he was convicted for getting a blow job from a 15 year-old girl &#8212; none &#8212; nada &#8212; zero.  In fact, Wilson was an honors student in high school.</p>
<p>The 15 year-old girl, who did not drink or smoke pot that night, does and has always said that this act was consensual.   In other words, she was not a &#8220;victim&#8221; as Johnson claims. </p>
<p>Wilson did not have intercourse, abusive or otherwise, with anybody who was passed out or barely conscious.  Wilson did have consensual intercourse the same night with another 17 year-old girl.  Despite Johnson&#8217;s insistence that he knows otherwise, the jury found Wilson not guilty on rape charges, and the alleged rape victim, says that Wilson did not rape her.  </p>
<p>Wilson, who again, had never been arrested before, didn&#8217;t plead out because he didn&#8217;t think that receiving a blow job should be illegal.  He also didn&#8217;t want to be a registered sex offender for the rest of his life.  I wouldn&#8217;t have pleaded out either.</p>
<p>Erick writes, &#8220;The fact is, as Eric Johnson said, the jury got him based on the 15 year old, but they really convicted him based on what he did with the 17 year old.&#8221;  Of course, this is not fact, but merely speculation on the part of Senator Johnson and accepted without question by Erick.  The fact is that members of the jury have actually sought to have the conviction overturned when they learned of the draconian sentence.</p>
<p>Eric and Erick have confused &#8220;facts&#8221; with facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radical Georgia Moderate &#187; Of note today</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50949</link>
		<dc:creator>Radical Georgia Moderate &#187; Of note today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50949</guid>
		<description>[...] If you can&#8217;t win, roll out the FUD. Griftdrift, who&#8217;s been doing an even more kick-ass job than usual of covering local issues lately, calls out state Senator Eric Johnson (again) and Erick Erickson for continuing to perpetuate urban legends about the Genarlow Wilson case. (Aside: I am refraining from commenting on Peach Pundit for a while. It gets my blood pressure up and accomplishes nothing. The only thing some of them understand is to treat them with the same lack of basic human decency they demonstrate. I&#8217;d prefer not to roll that way.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you can&#8217;t win, roll out the FUD. Griftdrift, who&#8217;s been doing an even more kick-ass job than usual of covering local issues lately, calls out state Senator Eric Johnson (again) and Erick Erickson for continuing to perpetuate urban legends about the Genarlow Wilson case. (Aside: I am refraining from commenting on Peach Pundit for a while. It gets my blood pressure up and accomplishes nothing. The only thing some of them understand is to treat them with the same lack of basic human decency they demonstrate. I&#8217;d prefer not to roll that way.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeartofGa</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50865</link>
		<dc:creator>HeartofGa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50865</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but I really think they&#039;re afraid of the ads that will run if they do anything that makes them appear to be soft, I mean sane, about sex offenders. You know the ones: children on swing sets, someone peering through the bushes etc. Saying that someone is soft on sex offenders is just one notch short of saying that they are, in fact, sex offenders. There are many problems with the law, even as it stands today, but the worst is that it generalizes a tough and expensive approach to a group that includes some who are actually a threat to our children and others who are not and never were. We need to focus resources on doing what will actually keep children safer, and consenual teen sex, no matter how morally objectionable the situation may be, is not one of those things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but I really think they&#8217;re afraid of the ads that will run if they do anything that makes them appear to be soft, I mean sane, about sex offenders. You know the ones: children on swing sets, someone peering through the bushes etc. Saying that someone is soft on sex offenders is just one notch short of saying that they are, in fact, sex offenders. There are many problems with the law, even as it stands today, but the worst is that it generalizes a tough and expensive approach to a group that includes some who are actually a threat to our children and others who are not and never were. We need to focus resources on doing what will actually keep children safer, and consenual teen sex, no matter how morally objectionable the situation may be, is not one of those things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50854</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50854</guid>
		<description>Heart of GA,

The next to the last thing legislatures want to do is get caught being racist. ?

Or, get caught running the court system?

Or, get caught giving the Governor a $100,000 back dated tax break?

Or, get caught taking classes in Scientology?

Or, get caught having sex with a lobbyist in a public place? (Especially after putting forward a special slice of legislation for that lobbyist)

What is second on the list of things lawmakers don&#039;t want to do?

(sarcasm intended)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heart of GA,</p>
<p>The next to the last thing legislatures want to do is get caught being racist. ?</p>
<p>Or, get caught running the court system?</p>
<p>Or, get caught giving the Governor a $100,000 back dated tax break?</p>
<p>Or, get caught taking classes in Scientology?</p>
<p>Or, get caught having sex with a lobbyist in a public place? (Especially after putting forward a special slice of legislation for that lobbyist)</p>
<p>What is second on the list of things lawmakers don&#8217;t want to do?</p>
<p>(sarcasm intended)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeartofGa</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50824</link>
		<dc:creator>HeartofGa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50824</guid>
		<description>I agree with your opposition to mandatory sentences, but fail to see how you can oppose them yet support one in this instance. If the law were not problematic, then the legislature would not have moved to change it. The last thing lawmakers want to do is appear &quot;soft&quot; on sex offenders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your opposition to mandatory sentences, but fail to see how you can oppose them yet support one in this instance. If the law were not problematic, then the legislature would not have moved to change it. The last thing lawmakers want to do is appear &#8220;soft&#8221; on sex offenders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Am Jacks Post</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50801</link>
		<dc:creator>I Am Jacks Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50801</guid>
		<description>Genarlow needs to get in line.  First we need to free Leonard Peltier, then Mumia (stay strong), and then the West Memphis 3, and then--and only then--does Genarlow get out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Genarlow needs to get in line.  First we need to free Leonard Peltier, then Mumia (stay strong), and then the West Memphis 3, and then&#8211;and only then&#8211;does Genarlow get out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griftdrift</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50799</link>
		<dc:creator>griftdrift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50799</guid>
		<description>JESUS EFFING CHRIST! He didn&#039;t take the deal because he would have had to register as a sex offender! That lives with you the rest of your life! In case you missed it, technically you can&#039;t live near a school bus stop in this state now if you are on that list. Already causing one woman in Augusta who was convicted for giving a blowjob in class to move.

By God if we are going to sit here and talk about the facts we are going to talk about all of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESUS EFFING CHRIST! He didn&#8217;t take the deal because he would have had to register as a sex offender! That lives with you the rest of your life! In case you missed it, technically you can&#8217;t live near a school bus stop in this state now if you are on that list. Already causing one woman in Augusta who was convicted for giving a blowjob in class to move.</p>
<p>By God if we are going to sit here and talk about the facts we are going to talk about all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griftdrift</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50798</link>
		<dc:creator>griftdrift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50798</guid>
		<description>Erick you are missing  the point. I am reading the cert to the Supremes now and the statute involved. The act with the 17 year old was the basis for the rape charge. The jury acquitted on that charge. Senator Johnson wants to emphasize there was a conviction and say we shouldn&#039;t question the juries decision since they saw the evidence but he doesn&#039;t want to clarify what the TWO SEPARATE verdicts actually mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick you are missing  the point. I am reading the cert to the Supremes now and the statute involved. The act with the 17 year old was the basis for the rape charge. The jury acquitted on that charge. Senator Johnson wants to emphasize there was a conviction and say we shouldn&#8217;t question the juries decision since they saw the evidence but he doesn&#8217;t want to clarify what the TWO SEPARATE verdicts actually mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50797</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50797</guid>
		<description>The fact is, as Eric Johnson said, the jury got him based on the 15 year old, but they really convicted him based on what he did with the 17 year old.

We shouldn&#039;t be arguing over the Genarlow Wilson Martyrdom campaign.  We should be arguing over the sentencing structure.

And, again, he was given time to take a deal and refused.  He played the odds and lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is, as Eric Johnson said, the jury got him based on the 15 year old, but they really convicted him based on what he did with the 17 year old.</p>
<p>We shouldn&#8217;t be arguing over the Genarlow Wilson Martyrdom campaign.  We should be arguing over the sentencing structure.</p>
<p>And, again, he was given time to take a deal and refused.  He played the odds and lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50796</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50796</guid>
		<description>Yeah.  The jury that convicted him after seeing the tape thought there was no rape.  They certainly thought there was more to it than consensual sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.  The jury that convicted him after seeing the tape thought there was no rape.  They certainly thought there was more to it than consensual sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Am Jacks Post</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50795</link>
		<dc:creator>I Am Jacks Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50795</guid>
		<description>I believe there&#039;s a record of about 40 previous arrests between Genarlow and the rest of his Wu Tang Clan.  Community activists, to be sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe there&#8217;s a record of about 40 previous arrests between Genarlow and the rest of his Wu Tang Clan.  Community activists, to be sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griftdrift</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50794</link>
		<dc:creator>griftdrift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50794</guid>
		<description>And the people that have seen the tape, the jury and the CNN reporter whose video I linked to have seen the tape. They all concluded there was no rape. 

Based on what was reported in the CNN video everything Senator Johnson has been saying at this point is exaggerated to put it kindly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the people that have seen the tape, the jury and the CNN reporter whose video I linked to have seen the tape. They all concluded there was no rape. </p>
<p>Based on what was reported in the CNN video everything Senator Johnson has been saying at this point is exaggerated to put it kindly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50790</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50790</guid>
		<description>Grift,

There were two girls involved.  One was a 15 year old and it appears there was consensual oral sex involved.

But the other was a 17 year old girl who was barely conscious when Genarlow and his buddies decided to have sex with her.

The buddies all plead out and Genarlow refused.  The tape, which I haven&#039;t seen but have had described for me, makes it clear that in those moments when the 17 year old girl was lucid, she was not consenting.

It&#039;s the stuff on the tape that damned Genarlow before the jury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grift,</p>
<p>There were two girls involved.  One was a 15 year old and it appears there was consensual oral sex involved.</p>
<p>But the other was a 17 year old girl who was barely conscious when Genarlow and his buddies decided to have sex with her.</p>
<p>The buddies all plead out and Genarlow refused.  The tape, which I haven&#8217;t seen but have had described for me, makes it clear that in those moments when the 17 year old girl was lucid, she was not consenting.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the stuff on the tape that damned Genarlow before the jury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griftdrift</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/comment-page-1/#comment-50789</link>
		<dc:creator>griftdrift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2007/02/21/missing-the-point-on-genarlow-wilson/#comment-50789</guid>
		<description>What are these facts? Even the prosecutor said it there appeared to be more force! This is entering urban legend territory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are these facts? Even the prosecutor said it there appeared to be more force! This is entering urban legend territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
