<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rally the GOP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:04:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Perdue gives &#8216;quiet blessing to Sue Everhart &#8216; &#124; Peach Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-2/#comment-48376</link>
		<dc:creator>Perdue gives &#8216;quiet blessing to Sue Everhart &#8216; &#124; Peach Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-48376</guid>
		<description>[...] So saith the Political Insider. While I agree we don&#8217;t want the Party&#8217;s rules to give a Republican Governor the sole authority to appoint a Chairman, you do want a Chairman who can and will work with a Republican Governor. Sue most certainly will work well with Perdue, Hobbs&#8230;..not so much. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So saith the Political Insider. While I agree we don&#8217;t want the Party&#8217;s rules to give a Republican Governor the sole authority to appoint a Chairman, you do want a Chairman who can and will work with a Republican Governor. Sue most certainly will work well with Perdue, Hobbs&#8230;..not so much. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-2/#comment-41051</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-41051</guid>
		<description>The State Committee does not have the authority to make State Rules changes.  This can only be done by the delegates at the State Convention.   Most of the rules changes are not easily passed.  There is usually a great deal of debate about them.  Any candidate for State Chairman would engender a great deal of dissatisfaction among the delegates if  the candidate was perceived as being beneficiary to a special rules change.  The candidate would not stand a chance of being elected in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The State Committee does not have the authority to make State Rules changes.  This can only be done by the delegates at the State Convention.   Most of the rules changes are not easily passed.  There is usually a great deal of debate about them.  Any candidate for State Chairman would engender a great deal of dissatisfaction among the delegates if  the candidate was perceived as being beneficiary to a special rules change.  The candidate would not stand a chance of being elected in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-2/#comment-41003</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-41003</guid>
		<description>Shep - I love my dear friends at the AJC (Galloway, I know you&#039;re out there!) but at this point it is all rumor and speculation.  I&#039;m a grassroots GOP guy myself, but I think the grassroots does itself no favors by debating a non-proposal to death before it is even put on the table.

Reacting to something that&#039;s not out there only undercuts the grassroots&#039; influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shep &#8211; I love my dear friends at the AJC (Galloway, I know you&#8217;re out there!) but at this point it is all rumor and speculation.  I&#8217;m a grassroots GOP guy myself, but I think the grassroots does itself no favors by debating a non-proposal to death before it is even put on the table.</p>
<p>Reacting to something that&#8217;s not out there only undercuts the grassroots&#8217; influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shep1975</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-2/#comment-40984</link>
		<dc:creator>shep1975</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40984</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know Clint...even if it&#039;s just academic, it&#039;s a nice debate to have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know Clint&#8230;even if it&#8217;s just academic, it&#8217;s a nice debate to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drjay</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-2/#comment-40937</link>
		<dc:creator>drjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40937</guid>
		<description>it seems that this would be the sort of thing that compromise would be in order for--unless there is some big contraversy or compelling reason to reject someone--perhaps the guv and the exec ctte. could come up w/ a compromise candidate to slate into the position that everyone would be happy w/ as opposed to setting it up as the grassroots vs. &quot;the man&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it seems that this would be the sort of thing that compromise would be in order for&#8211;unless there is some big contraversy or compelling reason to reject someone&#8211;perhaps the guv and the exec ctte. could come up w/ a compromise candidate to slate into the position that everyone would be happy w/ as opposed to setting it up as the grassroots vs. &#8220;the man&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rugby_fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-2/#comment-40934</link>
		<dc:creator>rugby_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40934</guid>
		<description>Debbie, the Democrats lost control because of a region-wide shift in allegiances due to a change in party philosophies. Grassroots had NOTHING to do with that. 

Grassroots MAY have gotten Perdue elected. I still think Roy Barnes is what got Sonny elected more than anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debbie, the Democrats lost control because of a region-wide shift in allegiances due to a change in party philosophies. Grassroots had NOTHING to do with that. </p>
<p>Grassroots MAY have gotten Perdue elected. I still think Roy Barnes is what got Sonny elected more than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie0040</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-2/#comment-40932</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie0040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40932</guid>
		<description>I think the grassroots should elect the chair. The Democrats turned their back on their grassroots and lost control. They forgot their base. Grassroots is what got Perdue and other Republicans elected.

We don&#039;t even know if this is going to be proposed or not. It could just be a rumor .

According to the rules, they have to send out a written notice of any proposed rule change at least twelve days before the meeting. For a rule change to pass at a State Committee Meeting, it has to be passed by a 3/4 majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the grassroots should elect the chair. The Democrats turned their back on their grassroots and lost control. They forgot their base. Grassroots is what got Perdue and other Republicans elected.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t even know if this is going to be proposed or not. It could just be a rumor .</p>
<p>According to the rules, they have to send out a written notice of any proposed rule change at least twelve days before the meeting. For a rule change to pass at a State Committee Meeting, it has to be passed by a 3/4 majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-40928</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40928</guid>
		<description>Folks - we are still &quot;responding&quot; to something that&#039;s not even out there (and no one has disputed that this is common practice around the country in both parties).  Caution is still the byword here.

And as for Mike J - while I respect your right to your opinion, calling John Watson a &quot;tool&quot; shows you have little experience with John or state government.  It is impossible to be COS and make everyone happy, and Watson&#039;s contributions are deep and lasting if not always seen for public consumption.

Still best for everyone to step back and relax until something concrete comes forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks &#8211; we are still &#8220;responding&#8221; to something that&#8217;s not even out there (and no one has disputed that this is common practice around the country in both parties).  Caution is still the byword here.</p>
<p>And as for Mike J &#8211; while I respect your right to your opinion, calling John Watson a &#8220;tool&#8221; shows you have little experience with John or state government.  It is impossible to be COS and make everyone happy, and Watson&#8217;s contributions are deep and lasting if not always seen for public consumption.</p>
<p>Still best for everyone to step back and relax until something concrete comes forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rugby_fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-40924</link>
		<dc:creator>rugby_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40924</guid>
		<description>Let me ask you this about South Carolina. Who do you think is more in line with the mores of SC, McCain or Bush. 

I strongly doubt that it was Grassroots that won the primary for Bush but his values (nee: Social Conservatism).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me ask you this about South Carolina. Who do you think is more in line with the mores of SC, McCain or Bush. </p>
<p>I strongly doubt that it was Grassroots that won the primary for Bush but his values (nee: Social Conservatism).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rugby_fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-40923</link>
		<dc:creator>rugby_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40923</guid>
		<description>From the Wikipedia entry on Grassroots: 

Most of those take place without a very strong grassroots. Very few of those genuinely move voters in significant numbers. As for the small donor fund raising, ask Howard Dean if that worked out too well for him. 

I said, when Grassroots will matter is in very close elections, a la, 2002 (although, I am willing to say that Roy Barnes won the election for Sonny, not Sonny&#039;s Grassroots). Even then, it will give you only a few percentage points on incredibly good years. 

The Republican Party rank and file is made of Grassroots in Georgia, but that was not the reason they took over. 

As for this year, had the base for the GOP turned out, the GOP still would have lost. This year was not a year for the base of either party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Wikipedia entry on Grassroots: </p>
<p>Most of those take place without a very strong grassroots. Very few of those genuinely move voters in significant numbers. As for the small donor fund raising, ask Howard Dean if that worked out too well for him. </p>
<p>I said, when Grassroots will matter is in very close elections, a la, 2002 (although, I am willing to say that Roy Barnes won the election for Sonny, not Sonny&#8217;s Grassroots). Even then, it will give you only a few percentage points on incredibly good years. </p>
<p>The Republican Party rank and file is made of Grassroots in Georgia, but that was not the reason they took over. </p>
<p>As for this year, had the base for the GOP turned out, the GOP still would have lost. This year was not a year for the base of either party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JRM2016</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-40922</link>
		<dc:creator>JRM2016</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40922</guid>
		<description>A couple of comments:

(1) Republicans have a long tradition up and down the line of supporting those who have paid their dues and dutifully waiting their turn for a position of power/prestige.  Witness the nomination of Bob Dole for President in 1996 as the most recent example of this on a national stage.  Sue Everhart has worked incredibly hard for Republican causes for years.  She has served well in the State GOP as First Vice Chair and anyone who remembers the 2004 or 2005 conventions can recall her superb organizational effort and campaign for Vice Chair, respectively.  I suggest that the 2007 State Convention will largely be a replay of 2005, in that she will run a great campaign and be elected.  If the Governor insists on putting his man in the running, he will be defeated.

(2)  Grassroots are important.  I lived in South Carolina in 2000.  I remember receiving a phone call the night of February 1, 2000 from Austin, Texas about the results of the New Hampshire primary, which appeared to put John McCain in the driver&#039;s seat for the GOP Presidential nomination.  Those of us in the SC Bush organization had been calling for months to identify &quot;Bush&quot; voters.  Lists had been developed in the case of my county, the most populous GOP County in the state, down to the precinct level.  On election day, we had volunteers working phone banks moving those people to the polls, we had poll watchers who went to polling stations to review the voter list and compare the list of those who had voted to our known list of &quot;Bush&quot; voters.  We had drivers giving rides to the polls and enthusiastic young people waving signs at major traffic intersections and near polling places.  Bush of course rolled to victory on the night of February 19 and that essentially sealed his nomination.  Grassroots moves people to polls and makes the difference.  I don&#039;t know if its 3% or 30%, but I know it is often the difference between winning and losing.  I heard former Senator Fred Thompson say recently about political campaigns that they are &quot;90% wasted effort, trouble is you just don&#039;t know what 10% is working.&quot;  I would humbly submit a large portion of that 10% is grassroots politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of comments:</p>
<p>(1) Republicans have a long tradition up and down the line of supporting those who have paid their dues and dutifully waiting their turn for a position of power/prestige.  Witness the nomination of Bob Dole for President in 1996 as the most recent example of this on a national stage.  Sue Everhart has worked incredibly hard for Republican causes for years.  She has served well in the State GOP as First Vice Chair and anyone who remembers the 2004 or 2005 conventions can recall her superb organizational effort and campaign for Vice Chair, respectively.  I suggest that the 2007 State Convention will largely be a replay of 2005, in that she will run a great campaign and be elected.  If the Governor insists on putting his man in the running, he will be defeated.</p>
<p>(2)  Grassroots are important.  I lived in South Carolina in 2000.  I remember receiving a phone call the night of February 1, 2000 from Austin, Texas about the results of the New Hampshire primary, which appeared to put John McCain in the driver&#8217;s seat for the GOP Presidential nomination.  Those of us in the SC Bush organization had been calling for months to identify &#8220;Bush&#8221; voters.  Lists had been developed in the case of my county, the most populous GOP County in the state, down to the precinct level.  On election day, we had volunteers working phone banks moving those people to the polls, we had poll watchers who went to polling stations to review the voter list and compare the list of those who had voted to our known list of &#8220;Bush&#8221; voters.  We had drivers giving rides to the polls and enthusiastic young people waving signs at major traffic intersections and near polling places.  Bush of course rolled to victory on the night of February 19 and that essentially sealed his nomination.  Grassroots moves people to polls and makes the difference.  I don&#8217;t know if its 3% or 30%, but I know it is often the difference between winning and losing.  I heard former Senator Fred Thompson say recently about political campaigns that they are &#8220;90% wasted effort, trouble is you just don&#8217;t know what 10% is working.&#8221;  I would humbly submit a large portion of that 10% is grassroots politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberty21</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-40920</link>
		<dc:creator>liberty21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40920</guid>
		<description>I agree with rugby_fan&#039;s statement. There will be republicans that would support a new deal in the future like former congressmen and new york city mayor Fiorello Henry La Guardia did in the 1930&#039;s and 1940&#039;s . La Guardia was also very pro-labor union, but he never been really recognized by Republicans as a Republican Leader. He was a Republican Congressmen that represented New York City in congress in 1920&#039;s, then was a Republican mayor of New York City. The airport in New York is named after him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with rugby_fan&#8217;s statement. There will be republicans that would support a new deal in the future like former congressmen and new york city mayor Fiorello Henry La Guardia did in the 1930&#8217;s and 1940&#8217;s . La Guardia was also very pro-labor union, but he never been really recognized by Republicans as a Republican Leader. He was a Republican Congressmen that represented New York City in congress in 1920&#8217;s, then was a Republican mayor of New York City. The airport in New York is named after him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atlantaman</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-40918</link>
		<dc:creator>atlantaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40918</guid>
		<description>&quot;As much as the GA Gop may think otherwise, you will not always hold the Governor’s chair....The Governor in Georgia (of either party) is pretty powerful. His good word and influence should be enough whether it is in the bylaws or not.&quot;

Pretty much agree with your comment, although I feel confident the proposed by-law will have a contigency plan if the Gov is not a Repub.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As much as the GA Gop may think otherwise, you will not always hold the Governor’s chair&#8230;.The Governor in Georgia (of either party) is pretty powerful. His good word and influence should be enough whether it is in the bylaws or not.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pretty much agree with your comment, although I feel confident the proposed by-law will have a contigency plan if the Gov is not a Repub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Fogle</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-40917</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Fogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40917</guid>
		<description>Chris,

I would agree with you on Bush, but disagree on Perdue.  Although his gubernatorial term is up in 2011, he still has one further step up the ladder he could go.

You never know my friend, he wouldn&#039;t be the first Georgia governor to win the White House as a dark horse candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>I would agree with you on Bush, but disagree on Perdue.  Although his gubernatorial term is up in 2011, he still has one further step up the ladder he could go.</p>
<p>You never know my friend, he wouldn&#8217;t be the first Georgia governor to win the White House as a dark horse candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Farris</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-40916</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40916</guid>
		<description>I agree with Erick and Jason, but for a slightly different reason. Now that Perdue and Bush don&#039;t need to win re-election their goals are more about legacy than party building. Their top priority isn&#039;t making sure that 2008 and 2010 see a Republican in the White House and Governor&#039;s Mansion. 

However, as Republicans, our top priority must be to hold on to these offices. 

We should listen closely to the Governor and who he endorses for Chair, but I don&#039;t think he should have carte blanche power to appoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Erick and Jason, but for a slightly different reason. Now that Perdue and Bush don&#8217;t need to win re-election their goals are more about legacy than party building. Their top priority isn&#8217;t making sure that 2008 and 2010 see a Republican in the White House and Governor&#8217;s Mansion. </p>
<p>However, as Republicans, our top priority must be to hold on to these offices. </p>
<p>We should listen closely to the Governor and who he endorses for Chair, but I don&#8217;t think he should have carte blanche power to appoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian from Ellijay</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-40894</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian from Ellijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40894</guid>
		<description>Rugby,  If you truly think that grassroots does not matter in an election...tell me how Sonny Perdue got elected in 2002.  

Grassroots is not merely putting up signs or going to breakfasts; it is about organizing your community, your civic groups, your churches.  It is about telling your neighbors, your friends and people in your community about your cause or candidate.  If you truly beleive that grassroots does not matter, think of the cost of the alternative... or ask the GAGOP how much they had to pay people to do in 2006 what was volunteered in 2002.  


I second Shep.  Rugby, grassroots is what built our majority in Georgia, it is also what has killed it in Congress.  Stray from those who brought you, and be left when they decide to go elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rugby,  If you truly think that grassroots does not matter in an election&#8230;tell me how Sonny Perdue got elected in 2002.  </p>
<p>Grassroots is not merely putting up signs or going to breakfasts; it is about organizing your community, your civic groups, your churches.  It is about telling your neighbors, your friends and people in your community about your cause or candidate.  If you truly beleive that grassroots does not matter, think of the cost of the alternative&#8230; or ask the GAGOP how much they had to pay people to do in 2006 what was volunteered in 2002.  </p>
<p>I second Shep.  Rugby, grassroots is what built our majority in Georgia, it is also what has killed it in Congress.  Stray from those who brought you, and be left when they decide to go elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian from Ellijay</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-40893</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian from Ellijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40893</guid>
		<description>Grassroots From Wikipedia:

 A grassroots political movement is one driven by the constituents of a community. The term implies that the genesis of the described political movement is natural yet spontaneous and imposes a dichotomy between this and a movement that is orchestrated by traditional power structures.


Grassroots organize and lobby through procedure including:

    * door-to-door, also known as canvassing
    * phone banking
    * house parties
    * meetings
    * putting up posters
    * talking with pedestrians on the street (often involving informational clipboards)
    * gathering signatures for petitions
    * setting up information tables
    * raising money from many small donors for political advertising or campaigns
    * organizing large demonstrations
    * asking individuals to submit opinions to media outlets and government officials
    * get out the vote activities which includes the practices of reminding people to vote and/or transporting them to polling places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grassroots From Wikipedia:</p>
<p> A grassroots political movement is one driven by the constituents of a community. The term implies that the genesis of the described political movement is natural yet spontaneous and imposes a dichotomy between this and a movement that is orchestrated by traditional power structures.</p>
<p>Grassroots organize and lobby through procedure including:</p>
<p>    * door-to-door, also known as canvassing<br />
    * phone banking<br />
    * house parties<br />
    * meetings<br />
    * putting up posters<br />
    * talking with pedestrians on the street (often involving informational clipboards)<br />
    * gathering signatures for petitions<br />
    * setting up information tables<br />
    * raising money from many small donors for political advertising or campaigns<br />
    * organizing large demonstrations<br />
    * asking individuals to submit opinions to media outlets and government officials<br />
    * get out the vote activities which includes the practices of reminding people to vote and/or transporting them to polling places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rugby_fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-40891</link>
		<dc:creator>rugby_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 05:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40891</guid>
		<description>Shep I am going to have to disagree with you on that and its effectiveness.

Yard signs don&#039;t move voters. OK, they&#039;ve moved this voter. BUT it is because I saw a &quot;Rambo for Sheriff&quot; yard sign. If there were no yard signs, campaigns would have much larger coffers. 

The D-2-D depends partly on the campaign for putting that together, and is not wholly dependent on very strong grassroots, and can be best utilized when augmenting a well rounded campaign. Meaning, D-2-D will give you maybe one or two more percentage points, and will only make a difference--some of the time--in close elections. 

A lack of grassroots had very little to do with the Democrats demise. That was part of an over all political shift in Georgia. 

For the GOP to stay in power 135 years, another New Deal and Reconstruction would have to happen and the GOP would have to support both. Grassroots will have nothing to do with either. 

As I said before, people do not support a party or candidate based on how well their supporters are organised. The new GOP supporters will come from where people move, their jobs, etc. Not on quality monthly breakfasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shep I am going to have to disagree with you on that and its effectiveness.</p>
<p>Yard signs don&#8217;t move voters. OK, they&#8217;ve moved this voter. BUT it is because I saw a &#8220;Rambo for Sheriff&#8221; yard sign. If there were no yard signs, campaigns would have much larger coffers. </p>
<p>The D-2-D depends partly on the campaign for putting that together, and is not wholly dependent on very strong grassroots, and can be best utilized when augmenting a well rounded campaign. Meaning, D-2-D will give you maybe one or two more percentage points, and will only make a difference&#8211;some of the time&#8211;in close elections. </p>
<p>A lack of grassroots had very little to do with the Democrats demise. That was part of an over all political shift in Georgia. </p>
<p>For the GOP to stay in power 135 years, another New Deal and Reconstruction would have to happen and the GOP would have to support both. Grassroots will have nothing to do with either. </p>
<p>As I said before, people do not support a party or candidate based on how well their supporters are organised. The new GOP supporters will come from where people move, their jobs, etc. Not on quality monthly breakfasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberty21</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-40890</link>
		<dc:creator>liberty21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 05:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40890</guid>
		<description>Would you vote for Thurbert Baker if he ran for Governor in 2010.  SHEP1975 GOP majority will not last centuries, but a decade or two. Demographics are shifting, but it depends on the platform of the GA GOP if they want to remain far-right or the GA GOP finally moves into the middle.  The GA GOP will be more successful as Centrists than Neo-Cons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you vote for Thurbert Baker if he ran for Governor in 2010.  SHEP1975 GOP majority will not last centuries, but a decade or two. Demographics are shifting, but it depends on the platform of the GA GOP if they want to remain far-right or the GA GOP finally moves into the middle.  The GA GOP will be more successful as Centrists than Neo-Cons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shep1975</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-40889</link>
		<dc:creator>shep1975</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 05:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/25/rally-the-gop/#comment-40889</guid>
		<description>Rugby_fan,

if the grassroots fall apart, there will be no one to put up the yard signs, no one to go door-to-door, no one to come up through the ranks to become the bench. This is what the Democrats are learning. They thought money could carry the whole day. Now they are far into the minority and have very little bench. It is the arrogance of power. Being flush with cash buys only laziness in politics. The GOP has been successful because we had volunteers working in the trenches while the Dems had to pay for their help. Our majority will not last 136 years, and it won&#039;t last 1/10 of that with the changing demographics in Georgia unless we have a lot of grass roots individuals committed to reaching out to bring new people into the GOP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rugby_fan,</p>
<p>if the grassroots fall apart, there will be no one to put up the yard signs, no one to go door-to-door, no one to come up through the ranks to become the bench. This is what the Democrats are learning. They thought money could carry the whole day. Now they are far into the minority and have very little bench. It is the arrogance of power. Being flush with cash buys only laziness in politics. The GOP has been successful because we had volunteers working in the trenches while the Dems had to pay for their help. Our majority will not last 136 years, and it won&#8217;t last 1/10 of that with the changing demographics in Georgia unless we have a lot of grass roots individuals committed to reaching out to bring new people into the GOP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
