<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shipp: Jones Means Saxby Success; Rivalry Weekend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:52:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Fogle</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-40874</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Fogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 04:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/#comment-40874</guid>
		<description>I do believe that I will take your word for it, good sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe that I will take your word for it, good sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rugby_fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-40870</link>
		<dc:creator>rugby_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 03:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/#comment-40870</guid>
		<description>I have a rather extensive knowledge of Cricket and can tell you, should you ever know everything you will see its all made up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a rather extensive knowledge of Cricket and can tell you, should you ever know everything you will see its all made up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Fogle</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-40865</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Fogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 02:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/#comment-40865</guid>
		<description>I dabble into my fair share of European sports such as Rugby, Futbol and Cricket.  Not as much the latter, but certainly a great deal the former two.  I have however, certainly seen my fair share of overs on the ole wicket.  I knew a chap with an off-cutter that&#039;d dismiss even the best of the top order.  He however, was quite the rabbit.

As far as my knowledge, I have, at best, a tea towel explanation of the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dabble into my fair share of European sports such as Rugby, Futbol and Cricket.  Not as much the latter, but certainly a great deal the former two.  I have however, certainly seen my fair share of overs on the ole wicket.  I knew a chap with an off-cutter that&#8217;d dismiss even the best of the top order.  He however, was quite the rabbit.</p>
<p>As far as my knowledge, I have, at best, a tea towel explanation of the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rugby_fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-40852</link>
		<dc:creator>rugby_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/#comment-40852</guid>
		<description>Mr. Fogle, where does your knowledge of Cricket come from? 

And as expected Shane Warne able to take full advantage of the destroyed pitch bowling a decent 4 for 108 with 7 maidens. 

Ole Warn-ie is having, quite the walkabout with the Pommie batsmen just wait till the SCG Test. If ever a pitch were designed for a spinner, there&#039;s your one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Fogle, where does your knowledge of Cricket come from? </p>
<p>And as expected Shane Warne able to take full advantage of the destroyed pitch bowling a decent 4 for 108 with 7 maidens. </p>
<p>Ole Warn-ie is having, quite the walkabout with the Pommie batsmen just wait till the SCG Test. If ever a pitch were designed for a spinner, there&#8217;s your one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rugby_fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-40839</link>
		<dc:creator>rugby_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/#comment-40839</guid>
		<description>pommies were bamboozled by McGrath. At least its not the Bodyline series all over again what? I&#039;ve got much more analysis later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pommies were bamboozled by McGrath. At least its not the Bodyline series all over again what? I&#8217;ve got much more analysis later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Fogle</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-40837</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Fogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/#comment-40837</guid>
		<description>Darn Rugby, I really thought the ole Soggy Isles had the gullies and slip fielders to knock off the Aussies.  Sounds like the Lucky Country delivered one too many yorkers to the block hole.  Looks like that famed Albion spin bowling isn&#039;t quite the jaffa we all thought.  I think it&#039;s time to cut those damned Blighty pie chuckers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darn Rugby, I really thought the ole Soggy Isles had the gullies and slip fielders to knock off the Aussies.  Sounds like the Lucky Country delivered one too many yorkers to the block hole.  Looks like that famed Albion spin bowling isn&#8217;t quite the jaffa we all thought.  I think it&#8217;s time to cut those damned Blighty pie chuckers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SevenHillsDem</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-40806</link>
		<dc:creator>SevenHillsDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 06:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/#comment-40806</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m for Marshall running against Saxby. But, if the numbers don&#039;t look good in a Marshall-Chambliss (re)match for the Senate seat, he&#039;ll stay in his Congressional seat to make sure it stays in Democratic hands.

Mike Thurmond should give it a try. He&#039;s more charismatic, has less baggage, and has won statewide before. He wouldn&#039;t have to give up his Labor Commissioner position and could give him a serious challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m for Marshall running against Saxby. But, if the numbers don&#8217;t look good in a Marshall-Chambliss (re)match for the Senate seat, he&#8217;ll stay in his Congressional seat to make sure it stays in Democratic hands.</p>
<p>Mike Thurmond should give it a try. He&#8217;s more charismatic, has less baggage, and has won statewide before. He wouldn&#8217;t have to give up his Labor Commissioner position and could give him a serious challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trackboy1</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-40804</link>
		<dc:creator>Trackboy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 05:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/#comment-40804</guid>
		<description>http://www.ocgnews.com/nov012006/dekalbCEOforSenate.htm
Will DeKalb CEO run for U.S. Senate? 

When he was quizzed about his political future during a recent speaking engagement before The Hungry Club Forum, he responded: “There&#039;s only three ways to Washington: U.S. Congress, U.S. Senate and President of the United States. All options are on the table for &#039;08.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ocgnews.com/nov012006/dekalbCEOforSenate.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ocgnews.com/nov012006/dekalbCEOforSenate.htm</a><br />
Will DeKalb CEO run for U.S. Senate? </p>
<p>When he was quizzed about his political future during a recent speaking engagement before The Hungry Club Forum, he responded: “There&#8217;s only three ways to Washington: U.S. Congress, U.S. Senate and President of the United States. All options are on the table for &#8216;08.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsm</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-40800</link>
		<dc:creator>jsm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 04:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/#comment-40800</guid>
		<description>Sorry about those predictions, rugby.  I was sure hoping on the first one.  As of right now, barring a miracle in L.A., you&#039;re 0-for-3.

Regarding the issue of the thread, I think Saxby should answer for his votes for wasteful farm subsidies and other various fiscal negligence.  I hope he has a serious GOP challenger.  We have GOT to take the lessons of this year&#039;s election day whoopin&#039; seriously and follow through on our principles in &#039;08.  We MUST challenge the status quo within our ranks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about those predictions, rugby.  I was sure hoping on the first one.  As of right now, barring a miracle in L.A., you&#8217;re 0-for-3.</p>
<p>Regarding the issue of the thread, I think Saxby should answer for his votes for wasteful farm subsidies and other various fiscal negligence.  I hope he has a serious GOP challenger.  We have GOT to take the lessons of this year&#8217;s election day whoopin&#8217; seriously and follow through on our principles in &#8216;08.  We MUST challenge the status quo within our ranks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rugby_fan</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-40769</link>
		<dc:creator>rugby_fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/#comment-40769</guid>
		<description>Wallabies handily defeat Scotland in Rugby, Australia crushing England in Cricket, and FSU shall beat Florida. What. A. Weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wallabies handily defeat Scotland in Rugby, Australia crushing England in Cricket, and FSU shall beat Florida. What. A. Weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Farris</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/comment-page-1/#comment-40766</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Farris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/24/shipp-jones-means-saxby-success-rivalry-weekend/#comment-40766</guid>
		<description>Only Johnny had it easier with Majette. Well, I guess Cox had it easier with Majette. 

Go Jackets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only Johnny had it easier with Majette. Well, I guess Cox had it easier with Majette. </p>
<p>Go Jackets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
