<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving on &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:13:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CobbGOPer</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/comment-page-1/#comment-39329</link>
		<dc:creator>CobbGOPer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/#comment-39329</guid>
		<description>Um, Cagle in &#039;10?  No.

I think we&#039;ll see one of two scenarios:  Isakson declares for Governor, and no one steps in to challenge him in a primary.  Likely wins in a landslide.

Or, Isakson stays put, and we see Richardson, Westmoreland, Cagle, maybe Johnson, maybe Handel,  among probably many others, that declare and duke it out.

The problem is, under that scenario, if the Dems could settle on one strong candidate and avoid a repeat of Taylor v. Cox (by convincing say, Thurbert Baker to run), that would make things prime for them to take back the Governer&#039;s mansion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Cagle in &#8217;10?  No.</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;ll see one of two scenarios:  Isakson declares for Governor, and no one steps in to challenge him in a primary.  Likely wins in a landslide.</p>
<p>Or, Isakson stays put, and we see Richardson, Westmoreland, Cagle, maybe Johnson, maybe Handel,  among probably many others, that declare and duke it out.</p>
<p>The problem is, under that scenario, if the Dems could settle on one strong candidate and avoid a repeat of Taylor v. Cox (by convincing say, Thurbert Baker to run), that would make things prime for them to take back the Governer&#8217;s mansion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demonbeck</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/comment-page-1/#comment-39325</link>
		<dc:creator>Demonbeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/#comment-39325</guid>
		<description>Senate holds, heroV, have fun trying to get anything done without a supermajority in the Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate holds, heroV, have fun trying to get anything done without a supermajority in the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heroV</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/comment-page-1/#comment-39324</link>
		<dc:creator>heroV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/#comment-39324</guid>
		<description>&quot;So, I’ll give you that one, Dems.  You got her.  You got the war to deal with.  You got healthcare to take care of.  You got Social Security to reform.  You got taxes to fix (or raise in your case).  You have national security to address.  You have an immigration crisis to solve.  Now, let’s see you do something with it.&quot;

So, what exactly were Republicans doing the past 6 years with both houses and the Presidency?  What was stopping them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So, I’ll give you that one, Dems.  You got her.  You got the war to deal with.  You got healthcare to take care of.  You got Social Security to reform.  You got taxes to fix (or raise in your case).  You have national security to address.  You have an immigration crisis to solve.  Now, let’s see you do something with it.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, what exactly were Republicans doing the past 6 years with both houses and the Presidency?  What was stopping them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fogle</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/comment-page-1/#comment-39312</link>
		<dc:creator>Fogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/#comment-39312</guid>
		<description>Rural Dem,

Fair enough.  We just don&#039;t want anyone to get ahead of themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rural Dem,</p>
<p>Fair enough.  We just don&#8217;t want anyone to get ahead of themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RuralDem</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/comment-page-1/#comment-39306</link>
		<dc:creator>RuralDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/#comment-39306</guid>
		<description>Fogle,

Calm down. Everyone is just assuming look at the current lead in that race will stay the same. It can change. Go fuss at everyone calling the VA and MT races as well or something and PLEASE quit spamming your link everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fogle,</p>
<p>Calm down. Everyone is just assuming look at the current lead in that race will stay the same. It can change. Go fuss at everyone calling the VA and MT races as well or something and PLEASE quit spamming your link everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fogle</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/comment-page-1/#comment-39302</link>
		<dc:creator>Fogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/#comment-39302</guid>
		<description>Y&#039;all are already calling the 12th for Barrow, but it is FAR TOO CLOSE.  I posted this on the &quot;Re: Marshall and Barrow&quot; thread...

&quot;Again, I remind y’all that Barrow is FAR FROM holding his seat. Max Burns can DEFINITELY still win this thing. It will come down to Effingham County, and then, probably absentee ballots. That means it isn’t looking like we will have a winner for days, weeks or longer. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloggingformax.com/archives/147&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;our analysis&lt;/a&gt; for a comprehensive breakdown of the current situation.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;all are already calling the 12th for Barrow, but it is FAR TOO CLOSE.  I posted this on the &#8220;Re: Marshall and Barrow&#8221; thread&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Again, I remind y’all that Barrow is FAR FROM holding his seat. Max Burns can DEFINITELY still win this thing. It will come down to Effingham County, and then, probably absentee ballots. That means it isn’t looking like we will have a winner for days, weeks or longer. See <a href="http://www.bloggingformax.com/archives/147" rel="nofollow">our analysis</a> for a comprehensive breakdown of the current situation.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decaturguy</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/comment-page-1/#comment-39297</link>
		<dc:creator>Decaturguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/#comment-39297</guid>
		<description>If you were going to beat Marshall or Barrow this would have been the year, given the weak status of the Democratic Party in Georgia, and given two former Congressmen with name recognition ran against them.  

No, save some personal scandal, it will get easier and easier for Marshall and Barrow to get re-elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were going to beat Marshall or Barrow this would have been the year, given the weak status of the Democratic Party in Georgia, and given two former Congressmen with name recognition ran against them.  </p>
<p>No, save some personal scandal, it will get easier and easier for Marshall and Barrow to get re-elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ugavi</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/comment-page-1/#comment-39292</link>
		<dc:creator>ugavi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/#comment-39292</guid>
		<description>Based on what happened at the Federal level - how about Isakson for Gov. in &#039;10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on what happened at the Federal level &#8211; how about Isakson for Gov. in &#8217;10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LiveFreeOrDie</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/comment-page-1/#comment-39289</link>
		<dc:creator>LiveFreeOrDie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/11/08/moving-on/#comment-39289</guid>
		<description>&quot;Cagle &#039;10&quot;?!?!?!

Ha, you&#039;ve got to be kidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Cagle &#8217;10&#8243;?!?!?!</p>
<p>Ha, you&#8217;ve got to be kidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

