Where is Jim

by Erick on October 31, 2006

With the political world abuzz with John Kerry’s remarks, you’d think Jim Marshall would have come out by now to condemn Kerry.

He hasn’t.

Let’s start the clock and see how long it takes him to publicly distance himself from John Kerry.

{ 12 comments }

me October 31, 2006 at 8:55 pm

Umm … how would you know what he’s said until the news is broadcast?

I doubt Congressman have much time to blog.

Erick October 31, 2006 at 10:08 pm

He has a website that puts up his press releases.

me October 31, 2006 at 10:18 pm

He doesn’t really do press releases.

But he was on WMAZ.

fulldawg October 31, 2006 at 10:36 pm

What is the point? Kerry is less relevant than Gore at this stage of the game.

RuralDem October 31, 2006 at 10:53 pm

I would go as far as saying Congressman Marshall does not really have to comment on it. It is already widely known that Congressman Marshall is independent.

The remarks Kerry made were wrong, however unlike Mac Collins, Congressman Marshall doesn’t have to make this race a national issue.

Maurice Atkinson October 31, 2006 at 11:37 pm

Uh, Rural, this race is a congressional race (a federal government seat) national issues are the focus on this race….

RuralDem October 31, 2006 at 11:45 pm

What does John Kerry have to do with Jim Marshall? Nothing at all. What I meant by national issue is using the “this isn’t about the issues it’s about Nancy Pelosi being speaker!!!” and other mess like that. Focus on the actual issues.

Fogle November 1, 2006 at 12:14 am

We’re wondering why John Barrow hasn’t said anything yet.

We can only assume that if he stays silent, it could mean he agrees with Kerry and finds mocking our soldiers fighting in Iraq to be an appropriate form of politicking.

We certainly hope that Barrow has enough integrity to publicly denounce Kerry’s actions.

Fogle November 1, 2006 at 12:18 am

After all, this is the guy Barrow endorsed to be the next President of the United States and one of the leaders of his party.

Democrats are always so quick to call on Republicans to distance themselves from anyone who acquires even a slightly tarnished reputation.

So we can’t help but ask why Barrow has yet to denounce the horrible actions of one of his party’s chief leaders?

RuralDem November 1, 2006 at 12:18 am

Did Max Burns and Mac Collins come out against Mark Foley? What about Duke Cunningham?

Fogle, according to your logic, if they did not then they obviously approve of their actions.

Twisted, isn’t it?

Fogle November 1, 2006 at 12:19 am

FYI:

“we” = Blogging for Max

RuralDem November 1, 2006 at 12:24 am

Ok?

Comments on this entry are closed.