THE BLOGOSPHERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(it’s global doncha know)

You’re an idiot.

Thanks for the tip, I’ll certainly keep it in mind.

You can comment all you want. I just think people criticizing foreign policy initiatives when they couldn’t do anything better is absurd.

You can criticize all day long, but when it comes right down to it, you don’t have a solution and certainly couldn’t do any better. Further, you might be a citizen but that doesn’t make you qualified to adequately analyze foreign policy.

Sure, you CAN comment, but that doesn’t mean you should.

When do they ever tell the truth?

“Mojo, your comment is funny to me. What would you do? I’m sure the Mojo Plan is on the docket next for the UN to discuss, but perhaps it was bumped for Hugo Chavez’ “Bush is the devil

Listen, local politics is one thing. Opposing Mark Taylor and Ralph Reed is really pretty simple and basic. However, the same sentiments cannot be translated into foreign policy. It’s an entirely different ballgame, and while I respect that we have some smart and experienced people here, not one single person could do better than Bush, Clinton, or even Carter (well, perhaps Carter is the exception, but you get the idea …).

It’s so easy for people to say “Bush hasn’t done anything with foreign policy, etc, etc, etc …” and “he should of done this” or “why didn’t he do that” but that gets on my nerves more than anything.

Finally, I haven’t been comparing Bush vs Clinton foreign policy, but if you do want to compare, Clinton supporters beware. I would much rather have a leader that does SOMETHING on foreign policy rather than someone like Clinton that d0es NOTHING!

Mojo, your comment is funny to me. What would you do? I’m sure the Mojo Plan is on the docket next for the UN to discuss, but perhaps it was bumped for Hugo Chavez’ “Bush is the devil” speech.

Everybody’s an expert, huh?

Hinton, what problem do you have with displaying the truth even if it is in a satirical or sarcastic format? There is no way one can legitimately say the Clinton Administration had more effective foreign policy initiatives than Bush. You might not like it, but again, some foreign policy action is better than none. Besides, it’s just funny. I bet you’re one of those guys who watches SNL for the issues discussed, totally missing the humor.

Finally, Bill, it has nothing to do with the GOP mantra. However, I would much rather live with my head up the a** of the Republican mantra than with my head up the a** of a donkey!

One thing the WH or the State Department doesn’t welcome is commonsense ideas being introduced into their decision-making processes.

Geez! You really live with your head so far up the ass of the Republican-mantra it is too funny.

I think a big problem with Clinton was the American public’s ambivalence to doing anything serious about foreign policy threats. He wanted to do so much but he knew the public would rise against him if he tried, and the GOP would have fanned the flames. Just look at what happened over Bosnia. The public’s determination to do anything substantial about foreign policy threats did not change until 9/11 and W was able to use that and totally f— everything up.

Well, I’m not in the party so I don’t have to toe any line.

Or maybe you just prefer ad hominem attacks?