<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Might Not Answer to Media, but you do Answer to Voters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/</link>
	<description>Fresh Political Pickins From The Peach State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:52:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peach Pundit &#187; Posts of the Year Nominations - Last Chance</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-25274</link>
		<dc:creator>Peach Pundit &#187; Posts of the Year Nominations - Last Chance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-25274</guid>
		<description>[...] GAWire (You might not answer ot media, but you do answer to voters) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GAWire (You might not answer ot media, but you do answer to voters) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorabill</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22521</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorabill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 23:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22521</guid>
		<description>Hey y&#039;all I&#039;m back.  Whoever thinks a Reed endorsement by Bush or Cheney would be good for Reed or good for Republicans or good for Georgia must be totally tuned in and tuned out to the azure blue of Fox News.  I&#039;m more into National stuff but we&#039;re not talking about Democrats or independents.  with Katrina, Casinos, the North American Union, immigration, the NAFTA superhighway, no-bid contracts,  Republicans are running, not walking away from anything that resembles neocons, globalists, or corporate smartasses.   Texans for Texas, Coloradans for Colorado, Georgians for Georgia,  and mabe Tancredo for president.  Get it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey y&#8217;all I&#8217;m back.  Whoever thinks a Reed endorsement by Bush or Cheney would be good for Reed or good for Republicans or good for Georgia must be totally tuned in and tuned out to the azure blue of Fox News.  I&#8217;m more into National stuff but we&#8217;re not talking about Democrats or independents.  with Katrina, Casinos, the North American Union, immigration, the NAFTA superhighway, no-bid contracts,  Republicans are running, not walking away from anything that resembles neocons, globalists, or corporate smartasses.   Texans for Texas, Coloradans for Colorado, Georgians for Georgia,  and mabe Tancredo for president.  Get it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BahamaBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22439</link>
		<dc:creator>BahamaBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22439</guid>
		<description>Debbie, you truly are the gift that keeps on giving.

You said: &quot;The lawsuits [against Reed] are civil to take advantage of the publicity. They are hoping for a quick out of court settlement.&quot; Now, how would you know what the plaintiffs are hoping for? Did Reed tell you. Or his campaign manager, Jared?

I spoke to people in the office of the attorney who filed to suit and, believe me Debbie, they are not interested in settlement with Reed. They want his hide, to borrow an Indian pun. I had them email me the lawsuit and I read it before passing it along to several other influential people. Have you read it, Debbie? Would you even know how to interpret the charges leveled against Reed and Abramoff?

So give us all a break and quit playing campaign lawyer here. The lawsuit was filed to recover damages from Reed and Abramoff, and the suit will likely destory what&#039;s left of Reed&#039;s crumbling lobbying empire. 

Deal with it, and mix up some more Kool-Aid for the kiddies too uninformed to actually read the lawsuit before telling the world it is meritless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debbie, you truly are the gift that keeps on giving.</p>
<p>You said: &#8220;The lawsuits [against Reed] are civil to take advantage of the publicity. They are hoping for a quick out of court settlement.&#8221; Now, how would you know what the plaintiffs are hoping for? Did Reed tell you. Or his campaign manager, Jared?</p>
<p>I spoke to people in the office of the attorney who filed to suit and, believe me Debbie, they are not interested in settlement with Reed. They want his hide, to borrow an Indian pun. I had them email me the lawsuit and I read it before passing it along to several other influential people. Have you read it, Debbie? Would you even know how to interpret the charges leveled against Reed and Abramoff?</p>
<p>So give us all a break and quit playing campaign lawyer here. The lawsuit was filed to recover damages from Reed and Abramoff, and the suit will likely destory what&#8217;s left of Reed&#8217;s crumbling lobbying empire. </p>
<p>Deal with it, and mix up some more Kool-Aid for the kiddies too uninformed to actually read the lawsuit before telling the world it is meritless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie0040</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22317</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie0040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22317</guid>
		<description>If Reed were target of the Senate Committee Investigation as Cagle has stated then certainly they would have focused attention on whether Reed did anything improper as they did with Abramoff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Reed were target of the Senate Committee Investigation as Cagle has stated then certainly they would have focused attention on whether Reed did anything improper as they did with Abramoff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie0040</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22315</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie0040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22315</guid>
		<description>Reed made his fortune in private enterprise not serving himself instead of serving the public as Cagle did.

The lawsuits are civil to take advantage of the publicity. They are hoping for a quick out of court settlement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reed made his fortune in private enterprise not serving himself instead of serving the public as Cagle did.</p>
<p>The lawsuits are civil to take advantage of the publicity. They are hoping for a quick out of court settlement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie0040</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22312</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie0040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22312</guid>
		<description>Jackson, you go back and read the posts. When I bet the steak dinner I was referring to the general. Stop your pathetic lying. I have mentioned Reed running ads with footage of W or Cheney saying nice things about Reed. I was wrong about that but I thought it would happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackson, you go back and read the posts. When I bet the steak dinner I was referring to the general. Stop your pathetic lying. I have mentioned Reed running ads with footage of W or Cheney saying nice things about Reed. I was wrong about that but I thought it would happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dagny</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22288</link>
		<dc:creator>dagny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22288</guid>
		<description>seriously, ayn rand is spinning....yeah, maybe sean penn and tim robbins can play those characters.  it&#039;s pretty ridiculous. not to mention, angelina does NOT have what it takes to play dagny.  it&#039;s absurd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously, ayn rand is spinning&#8230;.yeah, maybe sean penn and tim robbins can play those characters.  it&#8217;s pretty ridiculous. not to mention, angelina does NOT have what it takes to play dagny.  it&#8217;s absurd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GAWire</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22278</link>
		<dc:creator>GAWire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22278</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&quot;&quot;&quot;He IS answering to the voters.&quot;&quot;&quot;  

I and thousands of voters have asked him to account for numerous questions that we have, all of which Ralph Reed has failed to answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&#8221;"&#8221;He IS answering to the voters.&#8221;"&#8221;  </p>
<p>I and thousands of voters have asked him to account for numerous questions that we have, all of which Ralph Reed has failed to answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BahamaBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22277</link>
		<dc:creator>BahamaBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22277</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you folks are keeping up the battle online. Been out in the trenches today and it is looking mighty good -- for Cagle! Haven&#039;t seen much Reed activity. (Didn&#039;t eat at Waffle House this morning)

Judging from the rhetoric here today, the Kool-Aid drinkers are still believing the Chosen One and are in complete denial about their candidates checker past. Reed hasn&#039;t been cleared of anything, Debbie. The lawsuits have been filed; more will surely come, At least two Senate committees are investigating him and Abramoff. The IRS is also looking his misuse on nonprofits to conceal Indian money that was funneled to pay for his clandestine campaigns.

As long as ol Stealthy kept to his corporate and political clients, most of us couldn&#039;t care less. But he threw himself into the race for lieutenant governor so he could run for governor and then president. Mighty big ambitions for a man with such legal woes.

So I&#039;m going back to campaign for Cagle now, and leave you all in the good hands of intelligent folks I have never even met. Reading theirs posts comforts me to know that we are many and the Reedite are few. Little Cagle will slay Goliath Reed tomorrow, and we will rejoice. 

Now, where do I go collect my steak dinner from Little Debbie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you folks are keeping up the battle online. Been out in the trenches today and it is looking mighty good &#8212; for Cagle! Haven&#8217;t seen much Reed activity. (Didn&#8217;t eat at Waffle House this morning)</p>
<p>Judging from the rhetoric here today, the Kool-Aid drinkers are still believing the Chosen One and are in complete denial about their candidates checker past. Reed hasn&#8217;t been cleared of anything, Debbie. The lawsuits have been filed; more will surely come, At least two Senate committees are investigating him and Abramoff. The IRS is also looking his misuse on nonprofits to conceal Indian money that was funneled to pay for his clandestine campaigns.</p>
<p>As long as ol Stealthy kept to his corporate and political clients, most of us couldn&#8217;t care less. But he threw himself into the race for lieutenant governor so he could run for governor and then president. Mighty big ambitions for a man with such legal woes.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m going back to campaign for Cagle now, and leave you all in the good hands of intelligent folks I have never even met. Reading theirs posts comforts me to know that we are many and the Reedite are few. Little Cagle will slay Goliath Reed tomorrow, and we will rejoice. </p>
<p>Now, where do I go collect my steak dinner from Little Debbie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Emanuel</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22251</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Emanuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22251</guid>
		<description>Dagny? Is that your real name, or do we have more Atlas Shrugged characters jumping off the page and into the blog?  ;-)

By the way, you &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt; hear that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2006/04/28/brad_pitt_aamp_angelina_jolie_to_star_in&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;are slated to play&lt;/a&gt; John Galt and Dagny Taggart in the movie version, right? I know...Ayn Rand is probably spinning in her grave right now -- all we need is a couple more bleeding-heart liberal actors to play Ellis Wyatt and Hank Rearden, and the master plan to convert Atlas Shrugged into Das Kapital, part Deux will be complete....jeez...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dagny? Is that your real name, or do we have more Atlas Shrugged characters jumping off the page and into the blog?  <img src='http://www.peachpundit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>By the way, you <em>did</em> hear that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie <a href="http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2006/04/28/brad_pitt_aamp_angelina_jolie_to_star_in" rel="nofollow">are slated to play</a> John Galt and Dagny Taggart in the movie version, right? I know&#8230;Ayn Rand is probably spinning in her grave right now &#8212; all we need is a couple more bleeding-heart liberal actors to play Ellis Wyatt and Hank Rearden, and the master plan to convert Atlas Shrugged into Das Kapital, part Deux will be complete&#8230;.jeez&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22246</link>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22246</guid>
		<description>Dagny, the point is not who would W come for, it is that Debbie proclaimed, on multiple occasions, like Reed supporters have done, that the president is coming for Ralph, that all these dignitaries, and GOP officials are going to do TV ads for Ralph. it is a complete fabrication, and the fact that Debbie and anyone else on the Reed team is denying it now is absolutely the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dagny, the point is not who would W come for, it is that Debbie proclaimed, on multiple occasions, like Reed supporters have done, that the president is coming for Ralph, that all these dignitaries, and GOP officials are going to do TV ads for Ralph. it is a complete fabrication, and the fact that Debbie and anyone else on the Reed team is denying it now is absolutely the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22245</link>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22245</guid>
		<description>Debbie, since you like to cut and paste, go cut and paste the other comment threads. 

I would be happy for you to research my comments. I doubt you will post them because you still refuse to answer the questions posed in them.

As you said on 4/17 &quot;You guys need to lay off the “wacky weed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debbie, since you like to cut and paste, go cut and paste the other comment threads. </p>
<p>I would be happy for you to research my comments. I doubt you will post them because you still refuse to answer the questions posed in them.</p>
<p>As you said on 4/17 &#8220;You guys need to lay off the “wacky weed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dagny</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22244</link>
		<dc:creator>dagny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22244</guid>
		<description>Is this a serious question or a joke? Who would W be more willing to come campaign for? Come ON....Ralph is the ONLY one he would come in for. If it looks close for Perdue and he&#039;s here anyway helping the top of the ticket - he might do something for Cagle (if Cagle were the candidate), but I can assure you he isn&#039;t hopping on Air Force One for Cagle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a serious question or a joke? Who would W be more willing to come campaign for? Come ON&#8230;.Ralph is the ONLY one he would come in for. If it looks close for Perdue and he&#8217;s here anyway helping the top of the ticket &#8211; he might do something for Cagle (if Cagle were the candidate), but I can assure you he isn&#8217;t hopping on Air Force One for Cagle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22242</link>
		<dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22242</guid>
		<description>&quot;Jackson you know good and well I was referring to the general election when I said W and Cheney would come down here campaining for Reed. Typical Cagle bs and distortions.&quot;

Actually, on the first you were referring to the General election (which I still doubt Bush wil do ads because his popularity is low among democrats and independents...if Reed were to win). On the others you werent. Go back and read your own post Debbie.

Folks, if this doesnt sum it up, i dont know what does. Debbie made the comments herself. They are in plain daylight for everyone to see. Yet, she still lies. Its absolutely frickin Amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Jackson you know good and well I was referring to the general election when I said W and Cheney would come down here campaining for Reed. Typical Cagle bs and distortions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, on the first you were referring to the General election (which I still doubt Bush wil do ads because his popularity is low among democrats and independents&#8230;if Reed were to win). On the others you werent. Go back and read your own post Debbie.</p>
<p>Folks, if this doesnt sum it up, i dont know what does. Debbie made the comments herself. They are in plain daylight for everyone to see. Yet, she still lies. Its absolutely frickin Amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie0040</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22238</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie0040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22238</guid>
		<description>Jackson , typical lies and distortions about the steak dinner bit. You are pathetic.

Here is the actual dialog regarding that. Notice unlike you , I did not just post tidbits.
http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/04/03/r-v-c/#comments
debbie0040 said,
April 4, 2006 @ 10:01 am 

I want a leader that would not have gutted the child support law like I understand the legislature might have done. I want someone that will stand their ground and not compromise.
I think most GOP voters are sick and tired of Republicans being elected and then they lose their intestinal fortitude. They want a strong leader. Ralph Reed can do more to help Georgia with his connections and experience. I have seen nothing coming from the Cagle Camp other than negative attacks. I have seen Reed produce policy papers.

Who do you think W will more willing to come to Georgia and campaign for, Reed or Cagle?
http://www.ralphreed.com/v2/readmore.asp 


debbie0040 said,
April 4, 2006 @ 11:31 am 

Never mind Maurice. I put my reading glasses on and saw it was a different person . Blonde moment… I did agree with the sentiments about the child support bill. How can you not allow current non custodial parents paying inequitable amounts of child support not to be allowed to go back to court ? 

If true the GOP caved in and that is why electing Reed is so important. He will stand his ground and fight, fight, fight. That is what attracts me to the Reed camp. 

The General Election will be very nasty and we need a fighter on our ticket for Lt. Governor.

After the primary is over and Reed or Cagle wins, I hope what I said about all of us being part of the same team is true. Our job then will be to fight Democrats not each other. There are more issues that we agree on than issues we don’t agree on.

I hope each of you will pledge to support the GOP nominee. I will pledge that if Cagle is the nominee, I will work my tail off for him. 


debbie0040 said,
April 4, 2006 @ 11:36 am 

Larry, Jason is doing the right thing. He is YR Chairman and needs to show support for both. Jason will support the nominee and knows that the hard feelings out there now between both camps will vanish after a nominee is chosen.

Larry, I will buy you a steak dinner if W does not campaign for Reed when Reed wins the primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackson , typical lies and distortions about the steak dinner bit. You are pathetic.</p>
<p>Here is the actual dialog regarding that. Notice unlike you , I did not just post tidbits.<br />
<a href="http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/04/03/r-v-c/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/04/03/r-v-c/#comments</a><br />
debbie0040 said,<br />
April 4, 2006 @ 10:01 am </p>
<p>I want a leader that would not have gutted the child support law like I understand the legislature might have done. I want someone that will stand their ground and not compromise.<br />
I think most GOP voters are sick and tired of Republicans being elected and then they lose their intestinal fortitude. They want a strong leader. Ralph Reed can do more to help Georgia with his connections and experience. I have seen nothing coming from the Cagle Camp other than negative attacks. I have seen Reed produce policy papers.</p>
<p>Who do you think W will more willing to come to Georgia and campaign for, Reed or Cagle?<br />
<a href="http://www.ralphreed.com/v2/readmore.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.ralphreed.com/v2/readmore.asp</a> </p>
<p>debbie0040 said,<br />
April 4, 2006 @ 11:31 am </p>
<p>Never mind Maurice. I put my reading glasses on and saw it was a different person . Blonde moment… I did agree with the sentiments about the child support bill. How can you not allow current non custodial parents paying inequitable amounts of child support not to be allowed to go back to court ? </p>
<p>If true the GOP caved in and that is why electing Reed is so important. He will stand his ground and fight, fight, fight. That is what attracts me to the Reed camp. </p>
<p>The General Election will be very nasty and we need a fighter on our ticket for Lt. Governor.</p>
<p>After the primary is over and Reed or Cagle wins, I hope what I said about all of us being part of the same team is true. Our job then will be to fight Democrats not each other. There are more issues that we agree on than issues we don’t agree on.</p>
<p>I hope each of you will pledge to support the GOP nominee. I will pledge that if Cagle is the nominee, I will work my tail off for him. </p>
<p>debbie0040 said,<br />
April 4, 2006 @ 11:36 am </p>
<p>Larry, Jason is doing the right thing. He is YR Chairman and needs to show support for both. Jason will support the nominee and knows that the hard feelings out there now between both camps will vanish after a nominee is chosen.</p>
<p>Larry, I will buy you a steak dinner if W does not campaign for Reed when Reed wins the primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duluthmom</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22235</link>
		<dc:creator>duluthmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22235</guid>
		<description>Are you that dense to believe we should take an obviously biased source as &quot;proof&quot; of your assertions?  Everytime you post a blog or OpEd piece instead of an objective source, you lose all credibility.  On this site, virtually all the threads with links go to newspaper, magazine, or television reports that have no personal motivation to distort facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you that dense to believe we should take an obviously biased source as &#8220;proof&#8221; of your assertions?  Everytime you post a blog or OpEd piece instead of an objective source, you lose all credibility.  On this site, virtually all the threads with links go to newspaper, magazine, or television reports that have no personal motivation to distort facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie0040</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22232</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie0040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22232</guid>
		<description>duluthmom, are you that dense? I never said it wasn&#039;t paid for by Reed. duh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>duluthmom, are you that dense? I never said it wasn&#8217;t paid for by Reed. duh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debbie0040</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22231</link>
		<dc:creator>debbie0040</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22231</guid>
		<description>Jackson you know good and well I was referring to the general election when I said W and Cheney would come down here campaining for Reed. Typical Cagle bs and distortions.

People should do a search on the things YOU have said. I do believe you are paid Cagle staff. No doubts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackson you know good and well I was referring to the general election when I said W and Cheney would come down here campaining for Reed. Typical Cagle bs and distortions.</p>
<p>People should do a search on the things YOU have said. I do believe you are paid Cagle staff. No doubts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dagny</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22229</link>
		<dc:creator>dagny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22229</guid>
		<description>Ok, let&#039;s use our noggin here.  If Ralph spends all his time answering the attacks and hit piece interviews from out of state media, when would he have time to do what needs to be done IN the state. He&#039;s focused and way too smart to get caught up in that game. He IS answering to the voters.  Last time I checked, they live IN the state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, let&#8217;s use our noggin here.  If Ralph spends all his time answering the attacks and hit piece interviews from out of state media, when would he have time to do what needs to be done IN the state. He&#8217;s focused and way too smart to get caught up in that game. He IS answering to the voters.  Last time I checked, they live IN the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duluthmom</title>
		<link>http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/comment-page-1/#comment-22204</link>
		<dc:creator>duluthmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peachpundit.com/2006/07/17/you-might-not-answer-to-media-but-you-do-answer-to-voters/#comment-22204</guid>
		<description>Debbie-
Keep posting those URL&#039;s like you did on fact check.org.
I always find them good for a laugh including this morning&#039;s one on Reedfacts.

If you scroll down to the bottom of the link the reason for my laughter is apparent...

Quote: Copyright © 2006 ReedFacts.com. Paid for by Reed for Lt. Governor, inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debbie-<br />
Keep posting those URL&#8217;s like you did on fact check.org.<br />
I always find them good for a laugh including this morning&#8217;s one on Reedfacts.</p>
<p>If you scroll down to the bottom of the link the reason for my laughter is apparent&#8230;</p>
<p>Quote: Copyright © 2006 ReedFacts.com. Paid for by Reed for Lt. Governor, inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

